journal article·2024-03

Designing and Screening of Moisture‐Swing Porous Adsorbents for Rapid CO2 Capture from Air

Jun Liu, Zhen Zhang, Chenyang Liang, Weishu Wang, Tao Wang

ChemNanoMat· Volume 10· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Quaternary amine(QA)‐functionalized adsorbents using moisture swing method are demonstrated to have vast application prospect in capturing CO2 from the ambient air. However, the poor kinetic performance and limited sorbents remain a great challenge. In this work, the porous resins were screened and membrane with controllable porous structure was designed for CO2 air capture, and the effects of the varieties of QA‐based resins and external environmental conditions (humidity and temperature) on CO2 adsorption performance were quantitatively investigated. The results show that the kinetic performance of porous resins are far superior to the existing QA‐based direct air capture(DAC) materials, and the half‐time of D290 type membrane is only 102 s, much less than that of gelatinous resin, which is about 2400 s. The effect of microporous structure on CO2 adsorption rate increases with the increase of humidity, while only slightly effect was found on macroporous adsorbents. The research results can provide basic data for the application of CO2 capture in different occasions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Energy and Power Engineering North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power Zhengzhou 450045 Henan PR China

College of Energy Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou 310027 Zhejiang PR China

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/cnma.20190074210.1002/cnma.201900742 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jcou.2014.06.00510.1016/j.jcou.2014.06.005 ↗
3. 10.1002/anie.20150784610.1002/anie.201507846 ↗
4. 10.1002/ceat.20170018810.1002/ceat.201700188 ↗
5. 10.1039/c2ee03403d10.1039/c2ee03403d ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12753210.1016/j.cej.2020.127532 ↗
7. 10.1002/cssc.20160000410.1002/cssc.201600004 ↗
8. 10.1039/C9TA07297G10.1039/C9TA07297G ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ces.2014.05.01810.1016/j.ces.2014.05.018 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b0106010.1021/acs.iecr.5b01060 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20150695210.1002/anie.201506952 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0006410.1021/acs.iecr.8b00064 ↗
13. Wang T. · Energ. Fuego At. · 2017 · 31 · 11127
14. 10.1002/aic.1641810.1002/aic.16418 ↗
15. 10.1002/ange.20150784610.1002/ange.201507846 ↗
16. 10.1039/C2CP43124F10.1039/C2CP43124F ↗
17. 10.1039/c3ta10699c10.1039/c3ta10699c ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.08710.1016/j.cej.2017.08.087 ↗
19. Song J. Z. · Energ. Fuego At. · 2019 · 33 · 6562
20. Hou C. L. · Energ. Fuego At. · 2019 · 33 · 1745
21. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.00910.1016/j.cej.2015.09.009 ↗
22. 10.1039/C2EE24139K10.1039/C2EE24139K ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0318910.1021/acs.iecr.0c03189 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-020-77477-110.1038/s41598-020-77477-1 ↗
25. 10.1002/ghg.153510.1002/ghg.1535 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.10206410.1016/j.jcou.2022.102064 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20130040110.1002/adfm.201300401 ↗