Interfacial Assembly of Robust TiO2 Nanosheets Onto Silica‐Modified Reduced Graphene Oxide for Highly Efficient Degradation of Organic Dyes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The assembly of two‐dimensional (2D) transition‐metal oxides and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) has shown great potential in photocatalysis, energy storage, and photoelectric devices. In the work, we present a 3‐aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES)‐induced interfacial assembly route for preparation of a new type of 2D TiO2@RGO hybrid nanostructure. Benefiting from the electrostatic interaction between APTES and RGO, followed by the hydrolysis of APTES, an ultrathin SiO2 layer is first well grown into the surface of RGO. Subsequently, ultrathin TiO2 nanosheets (about 4 nm in thickness) are uniformly decorated onto the surface of silica‐modified RGO. These robust TiO2 nanosheets interconnect each other and form a unique net‐like architecture. Significantly, the TiO2@RGO products show superior structural stability. Consequently, the TiO2@RGO product annealed at 750 °C demonstrates an excellent photocatalytic activity and a good cycling life for degradation of organic dyes such as methyl orange (MO), rhodamine B (RhB) and methyl blue (MB) owing to the unique construction and enhanced synergistic effect.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering Shanghai University Shanghai 200444 P. R. China
Institute of Nanochemistry and Nanobiology Shanghai University Shanghai 200444 P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20060218910.1002/adma.200602189 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20110275210.1002/adma.201102752 ↗
3. 10.1039/C4CC05544F10.1039/C4CC05544F ↗
4. 10.1021/nn901221k10.1021/nn901221k ↗
5. 10.1039/C5TA05378A10.1039/C5TA05378A ↗
6. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.08.03610.1016/j.apcatb.2012.08.036 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.05610.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.056 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.04010.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.040 ↗
9. 10.1039/c6pp00133e10.1039/c6pp00133e ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.06.02810.1016/j.nanoen.2015.06.028 ↗
11. 10.1039/C5NR00504C10.1039/C5NR00504C ↗
12. 10.1039/C5CY00887E10.1039/C5CY00887E ↗
13. 10.1021/am201123u10.1021/am201123u ↗
14. 10.1039/C5NJ03441H10.1039/C5NJ03441H ↗
15. 10.1039/C5CC09929C10.1039/C5CC09929C ↗
16. 10.1039/C5CY00887E10.1039/C5CY00887E ↗
17. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.00310.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.00110.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.001 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20100163410.1002/anie.201001634 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.00210.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.002 ↗
21. Hao B. · Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5
22. 10.1002/adma.20110159910.1002/adma.201101599 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja800745y10.1021/ja800745y ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20090326710.1002/adma.200903267 ↗
25. 10.1039/C5TA00182J10.1039/C5TA00182J ↗
26. 10.1039/C4NR01524J10.1039/C4NR01524J ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20150101710.1002/adfm.201501017 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20150494010.1002/adfm.201504940 ↗
29. 10.1039/c4nr01322k10.1039/c4nr01322k ↗
30. 10.1021/nn300735s10.1021/nn300735s ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.03110.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.031 ↗
32. 10.1039/C3DT52542B10.1039/C3DT52542B ↗
33. 10.1039/c3ta11281k10.1039/c3ta11281k ↗
34. Wang C. · Adv. Mater. Interface · 2014 · 1 · 150
35. 10.1039/c4cp01401d10.1039/c4cp01401d ↗
36. 10.1039/C3TA14908K10.1039/C3TA14908K ↗
37. 10.1039/c2cp41318c10.1039/c2cp41318c ↗
38. 10.1039/c3nj01003a10.1039/c3nj01003a ↗
39. 10.1039/C6CE00578K10.1039/C6CE00578K ↗
40. 10.1039/C5CC04971G10.1039/C5CC04971G ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.06210.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.062 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.01410.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.014 ↗