Intelligent Optimization of Na−Mn−W/SiO2 Catalysts for the Oxidative Coupling of Methane
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Optimizing the performance and understanding the mechanism of metal oxide catalysts in the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) is one of the most important projects in industrial catalysis. Here, we report an intelligent approach to screen Na−Mn−W/SiO2 catalysts for the OCM reaction via ink‐jet printing and multidimensional group testing. The ink‐jet‐printing‐assisted (IJP‐A) synthetic methodology ensured a fast synthesis of 1536 catalysts that were evaluated in 24 tests via a multidimensional group testing strategy (m‐GT). After two‐round synthesis‐and‐screening processes, several excellent groups with different composition space were screened out. Among the excellent catalysts, the OCM performance of Na−Mn−W/SiO2 catalyst with higher Na, Mn and W content (G3 and G7) was less sensitive to its constituent than that of Na−Mn−W/SiO2 catalyst with lower Na, Mn and W content (G1). These results indicated the sensitivity of performance to its Na, Mn and W content decreased in larger Na, Mn and W spaces, consistent with the complex homogeneous/heterogeneous reaction mechanism and multi‐active sites. A series of Na−Mn−W/SiO2 formulas with good performance also provide a reasonable explanation to its excellent stability for the OCM reaction. In addition, this intelligent optimization in total space offers a pathway to study the multicomponent metal oxide catalyst in the OCM reaction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry Zhejiang University Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310027 P.R. China
Hangzhou Nanonov Inc. Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310027 P.R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fok Ying Tong Education Foundation
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world energy/natural-gas/natural-gas-reserves.html.2017.
2.
3. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.01510.1016/j.rser.2013.12.015 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0960-1481(00)00019-710.1016/S0960-1481(00)00019-7 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00253-009-2246-710.1007/s00253-009-2246-7 ↗
6.
7. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.07110.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.071 ↗
8. 10.3389/fchem.2014.0008110.3389/fchem.2014.00081 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.08.00110.1016/j.arabjc.2011.08.001 ↗
10.
11. 10.1016/0021-9517(82)90075-610.1016/0021-9517(82)90075-6 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.19950970110.1002/anie.199509701 ↗
13. 10.1016/0378-3820(94)00121-910.1016/0378-3820(94)00121-9 ↗
14. 10.1021/ie960669810.1021/ie9606698 ↗
15. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0042810.1021/acscatal.6b00428 ↗
16.
17. 10.1016/0009-2509(93)80274-T10.1016/0009-2509(93)80274-T ↗
18. 10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00456-910.1016/S0920-5861(00)00456-9 ↗
19. 10.1039/C4CY01443J10.1039/C4CY01443J ↗
20. Wang H. · Prog. Chem. · 2004 · 16 · 593
21.
22. 10.1016/S1003-9953(10)60156-910.1016/S1003-9953(10)60156-9 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.12.02410.1016/j.cattod.2013.12.024 ↗
24.
25. Fang X. P. · J. Mol. Cata. (China) · 1992 · 6 · 427
26. Fang X. · J. Mol. Catal. (China) · 1992 · 6 · 255
27.
28. 10.1134/S002315841605012810.1134/S0023158416050128 ↗
29. 10.1006/jcat.1998.210910.1006/jcat.1998.2109 ↗
30. 10.1021/j100151a03810.1021/j100151a038 ↗
31. Chen H. S. · Acta. Phys.-Chim. Sin. · 2001 · 17 · 11110.3866/PKU.WHXB20010204 ↗
32. Jiang Z. C. · 1997 · 481
33. 10.1006/jcat.1995.122110.1006/jcat.1995.1221 ↗
34.
35. 10.1002/cctc.20140001810.1002/cctc.201400018 ↗
36. 10.1023/A:101907251242310.1023/A:1019072512423 ↗
37.
38. 10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.01310.1016/j.cej.2011.02.013 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.catcom.2007.11.02210.1016/j.catcom.2007.11.022 ↗
40.
41. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.05.03410.1016/j.fuproc.2016.05.034 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jcat.2016.06.01410.1016/j.jcat.2016.06.014 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.catcom.2016.06.02510.1016/j.catcom.2016.06.025 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jechem.2015.06.00710.1016/j.jechem.2015.06.007 ↗
45. 10.1016/S1003-9953(11)60402-710.1016/S1003-9953(11)60402-7 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.01.00510.1016/j.cattod.2014.01.005 ↗
47.
48. 10.1016/j.catcom.2007.09.02610.1016/j.catcom.2007.09.026 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00248-310.1016/S0021-9517(03)00248-3 ↗
50. 10.1021/ie060269c10.1021/ie060269c ↗
51. 10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00864-X10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00864-X ↗
52. 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00432-310.1016/S0009-2509(02)00432-3 ↗
53. 10.1021/nl302992q10.1021/nl302992q ↗
54. 10.1039/C5CC01078K10.1039/C5CC01078K ↗
55. 10.1021/acscombsci.6b0010810.1021/acscombsci.6b00108 ↗
56.
57. J. R. Chasnov 2017 http://www.math.ust.hk/∼machas/numerical-methods.pdf.
58. Süli E. · 2003 · 3510.1017/CBO9780511801181 ↗
59. Schunk S. A. · 2006 · 373
60. 10.1016/S1003-9953(09)60047-510.1016/S1003-9953(09)60047-5 ↗
61.
62. Ji S. F. · J. Nat. Gas Chem. · 1999 · 19 · 526
63. 10.1039/C4CY00822G10.1039/C4CY00822G ↗
64.
65. 10.1016/j.apcata.2017.02.01810.1016/j.apcata.2017.02.018 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.apcata.2016.06.03410.1016/j.apcata.2016.06.034 ↗
67. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0291410.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02914 ↗
68.
69. 10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.01310.1016/j.cej.2011.02.013 ↗
70. 10.1016/S0926-860X(97)00340-210.1016/S0926-860X(97)00340-2 ↗
71. Wang X. L. · Petrochem. Tech. (China) · 1997 · 26 · 361