journal article·2026-07-19

Investigation of Room-Temperature Oxygen Adsorption by Bimetallic Iron–Cobalt Metal–Organic Framework-74

Leena Melag, Hamidreza Mahdavi, Kiyonori Suzuki, Kristina Konstas, Hayden A. Evans, Craig. M. Brown, Jose S. Garitaonandia, Matthew R. Hill

Publisher page

Abstract

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as promising candidates for selective gas adsorption due to their tunable structures, high porosity, and numerous open metal sites (OMSs). This research synthesizes and characterizes bimetallic Fe x Co 1– x -MOF-74 frameworks containing both iron (Fe) and cobalt (Co) metal centers to investigate and improve their oxygen (O 2 ) adsorption performances. Monometallic Fe-MOF-74 and Co-MOF-74, as well as bimetallic versions with Fe/Co ratios of 0.1:0.9, 0.5:0.5, and 0.9:0.1, were synthesized by a solvothermal method. A thorough characterization analysis was performed to verify their structural integrity, porosity, thermal stability, and metal composition. O 2 adsorption isotherms were assessed at 204, 273, and 298 K to analyze adsorption capacity and temperature-dependent characteristics. Cyclability experiments at 298 K examined the reusability of the materials during multiple adsorption–desorption cycles. Advanced characterization techniques, such as vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM), 57 Fe–Mössbauer spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), unveiled the possible adsorption mechanism. The findings indicate that monometallic Fe-MOF-74 has a significant initial O 2 adsorption capacity of 2.58 mmol/g at 298 K due to strong chemisorption at Fe sites. However, its cyclability is poor due to the irreversible oxidation of Fe 2+ to Fe 3+ at 298 K, resulting in a large drop after the first cycle. In contrast, Co-MOF-74 has a lower initial capacity of 0.36 mmol/g at 298 K, but demonstrates superior reversibility, maintaining consistent performance throughout several cycles owing to weaker, reversible physisorption. Among the bimetallic variants, Fe 0.5 Co 0.5 -MOF-74 achieves an optimum balance, exhibiting a moderate initial capacity of 0.82 mmol/g at 298 K and maintaining steady performance of around 0.65 mmol/g over seven cycles. The addition of Co stabilizes the Fe sites against oxidation and improves the material’s reusability. Mechanistic investigations demonstrate that Co mitigates Fe oxidation by facilitating reversible interactions and preventing the formation of irreversible Fe–O 2 bonds. The results underscore the promise of bimetallic MOFs as adaptable platforms for effective and sustainable O 2 capture, where the Fe/Co ratio can be adjusted to optimize adsorption capacity and cyclability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Covalent Organic Framework Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CSIRO, Mineral Resources, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, VIC 3169, Australia

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Monash University

CSIRO, Manufacturing, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, VIC 3169, Australia

Centre for Neutron Research

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Department of Physics, Faculty of Science & Technology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Sarriena Auzoa z/g, 48940 Leioa, Basque, Spain

References (89)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ie970521410.1021/ie9705214 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.11244210.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112442 ↗
3. 10.1021/je050507v10.1021/je050507v ↗
4. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.10998910.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109989 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16127310.1016/j.cej.2025.161273 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.iecr.4c0285810.1021/acs.iecr.4c02858 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41586-024-08080-x10.1038/s41586-024-08080-x ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0706210.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07062 ↗
9. 10.1039/D6MA00271D10.1039/D6MA00271D ↗
10. 10.1021/cr200327210.1021/cr2003272 ↗
11. 10.1039/b927499e10.1039/b927499e ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ces.2010.10.00210.1016/j.ces.2010.10.002 ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.090971810610.1073/pnas.0909718106 ↗
14. 10.1021/jacs.3c0210010.1021/jacs.3c02100 ↗
15. 10.1038/nature0165010.1038/nature01650 ↗
16. 10.1038/378703a010.1038/378703a0 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja045123o10.1021/ja045123o ↗
18. 10.1021/cr300014x10.1021/cr300014x ↗
19. 10.1038/s43246-024-00608-y10.1038/s43246-024-00608-y ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c0150010.1021/acs.langmuir.4c01500 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.108344010.1126/science.1083440 ↗
22. 10.1039/b911242a10.1039/b911242a ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.10510.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.105 ↗
24. 10.1039/D0RA07068H10.1039/D0RA07068H ↗
25. Weston, M. H.; Fuller, P.; Siu, P. W.m. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Oxygen Storage and Air Separation. U.S. Patent US9427722B2, 2016.
26. 10.1039/C3SC52633J10.1039/C3SC52633J ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0081010.1021/acs.iecr.8b00810 ↗
28. 10.1039/c2jm32719h10.1039/c2jm32719h ↗
29. 10.1007/s10563-012-9135-210.1007/s10563-012-9135-2 ↗
30. 10.1021/ar400130a10.1021/ar400130a ↗
31. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
32. 10.1039/c0jm01770a10.1039/c0jm01770a ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.08.00210.1016/j.ccr.2015.08.002 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja205976v10.1021/ja205976v ↗
35. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.12.03510.1016/j.micromeso.2011.12.035 ↗
36. 10.1039/C1EE02234B10.1039/C1EE02234B ↗
37. 10.3389/fmats.2019.0023010.3389/fmats.2019.00230 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1205210.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12052 ↗
39. 10.1039/C8TA07739H10.1039/C8TA07739H ↗
40. 10.1021/ja800715910.1021/ja8007159 ↗
41. 10.1021/cg500190h10.1021/cg500190h ↗
42. 10.1139/cjc-2016-028410.1139/cjc-2016-0284 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp511789g10.1021/jp511789g ↗
44. 10.1021/ja506230r10.1021/ja506230r ↗
45. 10.1021/ja900258t10.1021/ja900258t ↗
46. 10.1039/c0cc00091d10.1039/c0cc00091d ↗
47. 10.1039/C6DT00538A10.1039/C6DT00538A ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.08.00810.1016/j.ccr.2016.08.008 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.08.02810.1016/j.ccr.2004.08.028 ↗
50. 10.1038/ncomms503210.1038/ncomms5032 ↗
51. 10.1039/b802426j10.1039/b802426j ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20160025910.1002/adma.201600259 ↗
53. 10.1021/jacs.6b0368010.1021/jacs.6b03680 ↗
54. 10.1246/bcsj.71.226710.1246/bcsj.71.2267 ↗
55. 10.1039/C5RA10755E10.1039/C5RA10755E ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jes.2018.12.01310.1016/j.jes.2018.12.013 ↗
57. 10.1039/C7DT03047A10.1039/C7DT03047A ↗
58. 10.1039/C6QI00441E10.1039/C6QI00441E ↗
59. 10.1002/asia.20200032110.1002/asia.202000321 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.04.03110.1016/j.micromeso.2019.04.031 ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b0384310.1021/acs.iecr.5b03843 ↗
62. 10.1021/jacs.6b0872410.1021/jacs.6b08724 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsami.7b1549910.1021/acsami.7b15499 ↗
64. 10.1039/D2RA05974F10.1039/D2RA05974F ↗
65. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0171710.1021/acsomega.2c01717 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.06310.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.063 ↗
67. 10.1016/0169-4332(96)00252-810.1016/0169-4332(96)00252-8 ↗
68. 10.1016/S0039-6028(99)01006-710.1016/S0039-6028(99)01006-7 ↗
69. 10.1021/acsanm.8b0110610.1021/acsanm.8b01106 ↗
70. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1256110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12561 ↗
71. 10.1021/jacs.9b1240110.1021/jacs.9b12401 ↗
72. 10.1002/anie.20191458710.1002/anie.201914587 ↗
73. 10.1038/s41467-020-16897-z10.1038/s41467-020-16897-z ↗
74. 10.1021/ja102792510.1021/ja1027925 ↗
75. 10.1039/C7DT02957H10.1039/C7DT02957H ↗
76. 10.1002/anie.20160295010.1002/anie.201602950 ↗
77. 10.1021/cm504229310.1021/cm5042293 ↗
78. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0024910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00249 ↗
79. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b0204610.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02046 ↗
80. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0098110.1021/acs.iecr.8b00981 ↗
81. 10.1021/la702466d10.1021/la702466d ↗
82. 10.1021/jp906417z10.1021/jp906417z ↗
83. 10.1021/jacs.0c0657010.1021/jacs.0c06570 ↗
84. 10.1021/jacs.3c1075310.1021/jacs.3c10753 ↗
85. 10.1039/C7SC03739B10.1039/C7SC03739B ↗
86. 10.1039/D2SC03577D10.1039/D2SC03577D ↗
87. 10.1021/ja510310310.1021/ja5103103 ↗
88. 10.1039/C9SC06047B10.1039/C9SC06047B ↗
89. 10.1021/jacs.6b0024810.1021/jacs.6b00248 ↗