Active Learning for Generalizable Detonation Performance Prediction of Energetic Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The discovery of new energetic materials is critical for advancing technologies from defense to private industry. However, experimental approaches remain slow and expensive, while computational alternatives require accurate material property inputs that are often costly to obtain, limiting their ability to efficiently predict detonation performance across a vast chemical space. We address this challenge through an active learning strategy that integrates density functional theory calculations, thermochemical modeling, message-passing neural networks, and Bayesian optimization. The resulting high-throughput workflow iteratively expands the training data set by selecting new molecules in a targeted manner that balances the exploration of broad chemical space with the exploitation of promising high-performing candidates. This approach yields the largest publicly available database of potential CHNO explosives drawn from an initial pool of more than 70 billion candidates and a generalizable surrogate model capable of accurately predicting detonation performance ( R 2 > 0.98). Feature importance analysis on this largest-to-date data set reveals that oxygen balance is the dominant driver of detonation performance, complemented by contributions from local electronic structure, density, and the presence of specific functional groups. Cheminformatics analysis highlights how energetic materials with similar performance metrics tend to cluster in distinct chemical spaces, offering a clearer direction for future synthesis studies. Together, the surrogate model, database, and resulting chemical insights provide a valuable foundation for high-throughput screening and targeted discovery of new energetic materials spanning diverse and previously unexplored regions of chemical space.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Combustion and Detonation Processes · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Theoretical Division
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Texas Tech University
Weapon Stockpile Modernization Division
Funding
Los Alamos National Laboratory · National Nuclear Security Administration
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/cryst601000510.3390/cryst6010005 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0040-6031(01)00805-X10.1016/S0040-6031(01)00805-X ↗
3. Klapötke T. M. · 202210.1515/9783110739503 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.00510.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.005 ↗
5. 10.1128/aem.31.4.576-580.197610.1128/aem.31.4.576-580.1976 ↗
6. 10.1002/prep.20150009010.1002/prep.201500090 ↗
7. 10.1002/prep.20090004510.1002/prep.200900045 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8CC09653H10.1039/C8CC09653H ↗
9. 10.1016/S0040-4020(98)83040-810.1016/S0040-4020(98)83040-8 ↗
10. 10.1070/RC2005v074n08ABEH00117910.1070/RC2005v074n08ABEH001179 ↗
11. Salij, A.; Ullberg, S.; Davis, M. C. Generative Chemical Language Models for Energetic Materials Discovery. arXiv:2604.03304. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. 2026 https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03304.
12. 10.1002/wcms.118310.1002/wcms.1183 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-981-15-2445-5_310.1007/978-981-15-2445-5_3 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41524-017-0056-510.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.03910.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.039 ↗
16. 10.1063/5.001838410.1063/5.0018384 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0008710.1021/acs.accounts.8b00087 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-018-27344-x10.1038/s41598-018-27344-x ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jechem.2024.10.03510.1016/j.jechem.2024.10.035 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c0197810.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01978 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c0264710.1021/acs.jpca.0c02647 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c0025910.1021/acs.jcim.0c00259 ↗
23. 10.3390/pr1301003910.3390/pr13010039 ↗
24. 10.3390/molecules2801032210.3390/molecules28010322 ↗
25. 10.1002/adts.20210005710.1002/adts.202100057 ↗
26. Davis, J. V.; Marrs, F. W.; Burch, A. C. In Prediction of Impact Sensitivity, Heat of Formation and Heat of Explosion Using Atomic Connectivity ; AIP Conference Proceedings AIP, 202328000110.1063/12.0020520.10.1063/12.0020520 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.dt.2022.11.01110.1016/j.dt.2022.11.011 ↗
28. 10.1002/prep.20220026410.1002/prep.202200264 ↗
29. Murphy K. P. · 2012
30. 10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.8810.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
31. 10.1002/wcms.160310.1002/wcms.1603 ↗
32. 10.1021/ci00057a00510.1021/ci00057a005 ↗
33. 10.1002/prep.20240024810.1002/prep.202400248 ↗
34. Jiang, S.; Balaprakash, P. In Graph Neural Network Architecture Search for Molecular Property Prediction ; IEEE International conference on big data (big data) IEEE, 2020; pp 1346–1353.10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378060 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c0084110.1021/acs.jcim.2c00841 ↗
36. 10.1002/prep.20220026510.1002/prep.202200265 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c0172810.1021/acs.jcim.5c01728 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41586-023-06887-810.1038/s41586-023-06887-8 ↗
39. 10.1186/s13321-019-0391-210.1186/s13321-019-0391-2 ↗
40. 10.1002/prep.7006410.1002/prep.70064 ↗
41. 10.1021/ja902302h10.1021/ja902302h ↗
42. 10.1021/ci300415d10.1021/ci300415d ↗
43. 10.1021/ci600423u10.1021/ci600423u ↗
44. 10.1002/anie.20046245710.1002/anie.200462457 ↗
45. 10.1107/S205252061600395410.1107/S2052520616003954 ↗
46. Antoniuk, E. R.; Li, P.; Keilbart, N.; Weitzner, S.; Kailkhura, B.; Hiszpanski, A. M. In Active Learning Enables Extrapolation in Molecular Generative Models 2025, arXiv:2501.02059. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02059.
47. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B. Gaussian 16 Revision C.03 Wallingford, 2016.
48. 10.1039/b810189b10.1039/b810189b ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b0065410.1021/acs.jcim.5b00654 ↗
50. Landrum, G.; Paolo, T.; Brian, K. rdkit/rdkit: 2024_09_4 (Q3 2024) Release. Zenodo 2024 10.5281/zenodo.14535873.10.5281/zenodo.14535873 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b0117610.1021/acs.jctc.8b01176 ↗
52. 10.1088/1361-648x/aa680e10.1088/1361-648x/aa680e ↗
53. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.04310.1016/j.commatsci.2018.07.043 ↗
54. Fried, L. E. CHEETAH: A Fast Thermochemical Code for Detonation , 1993https://www.osti.gov/biblio/10154126.10.2172/10154126 ↗
55. Fried, L.; Souers, P. CHEETAH: A Next Generation Thermochemical Code , 1994https://www.osti.gov/biblio/9518410.2172/95184.10.2172/95184 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.166790810.1063/1.1667908 ↗
57. Levine H. B. · 1962
58. Cowperthwaite, M.; Zwisler, W. TIGER Computer Program Documentation Stanford Research Institut , California University 1973.
59. Mader C. L. · 200710.1201/9781420052398 ↗
60. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.465-466.32510.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.465-466.325 ↗
61. Grys S. · Cent. Eur. J. Energy Mater. · 2010 · 7 · 97
62. 10.1080/1478644990862124310.1080/14786449908621243 ↗
63. Jouguet E. · J. Math Pures Appl. · 1905 · 1 · 347
64. Mader C. L. · 1963 · 2900
65. 10.2307/237140510.2307/2371405 ↗
66. 10.1137/14098581010.1137/140985810 ↗
67. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0300110.1021/acs.iecr.8b03001 ↗
68. 10.1039/D2CP05742E10.1039/D2CP05742E ↗
69. 10.1039/BK9781839164460-0008910.1039/BK9781839164460-00089 ↗
70. 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199604)17:5/63.0.co;2-p10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199604)17:5/63.0.co;2-p ↗
71. 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c0125010.1021/acs.jcim.3c01250 ↗
72. Liaw, R.; Liang, E.; Nishihara, R. Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Training. 2018, arXiv:1807.05118. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. 10.48550/arXiv.1807.05118.10.48550/arXiv.1807.05118 ↗
73. Li, L.; Jamieson, K.; Rostamizadeh, A. In A System for Massively Parallel Hyperparameter Tuning ; Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems 2 MLSys, 2020 10.48550/arXiv.1810.05934.10.48550/arXiv.1810.05934 ↗
74. Nix, D. A.; Weigend, A. S. Estimating the Mean and Variance of the Target Probability Distribution ; Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN’94) vol. 1 IEEE, 1994; pp 55–60.10.1109/ICNN.1994.374138 ↗
75. Kinga, D. P.; Ba, J. B. In Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization ; International conference on learning representations (ICLR) ICLR, 2015.
76. Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N. In Attention is All You Need ; Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 NIPS, 2017.
77. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1128(199601)16:1<3::AID-MED1>3.0.CO;2-610.1002/(SICI)1098-1128(199601)16:1<3::AID-MED1>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
78. 10.1023/A:100830643114710.1023/A:1008306431147 ↗
79. Gan, W.; Ji, Z.; Liang, Y. In Acquisition Functions in Bayesian Optimization ; 2nd international conference on big data & artificial intelligence & software engineering (ICBASE) IEEE, 2021; pp 129–135.10.1109/ICBASE53849.2021.00032 ↗
80. 10.1093/nar/gkv95110.1093/nar/gkv951 ↗
81. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c0125310.1021/acs.jcim.2c01253 ↗
82. 10.1093/nar/gkr77710.1093/nar/gkr777 ↗
83. 10.1007/s10822-011-9440-210.1007/s10822-011-9440-2 ↗
84. 10.1186/s13321-016-0113-y10.1186/s13321-016-0113-y ↗
85. 10.1016/j.enmf.2023.09.00110.1016/j.enmf.2023.09.001 ↗
86. 10.1038/npre.2011.6229.110.1038/npre.2011.6229.1 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.enmf.2024.09.00510.1016/j.enmf.2024.09.005 ↗
88. 10.5195/jmla.2018.51510.5195/jmla.2018.515 ↗
89. 10.1186/1758-2946-1-810.1186/1758-2946-1-8 ↗
90. 10.1214/aos/101320345110.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
91. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
92. 10.1007/bf0005865510.1007/bf00058655 ↗
93. 10.1039/TF958540025710.1039/TF9585400257 ↗
94. 10.1039/TF958540026410.1039/TF9585400264 ↗
95. 10.1002/prep.1979004020410.1002/prep.19790040204 ↗
96. Lundberg, S. M.; Lee, S.I. In A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions ; Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 Guyon, I., Ed. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017; pp 4765–4774.
97. 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-910.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
98. 10.1021/ci00046a00210.1021/ci00046a002 ↗
99. Tanimoto, T. T. An Elementary Mathematical Theory of Classification and Prediction 1958.
100. 10.1186/s13321-015-0069-310.1186/s13321-015-0069-3 ↗