journal article·2026-07-14

Tailored Rh–Al 2 O 3 –ZrO 2 Interfaces: Insights into Rh Aluminate Formation and Enhanced Stability

Gennaro Liccardo, Bang T. Nhan, Pin-Hung Chung, Daniel Hutton, Giulio D’Acunto, Shyama C. Mandal, Jacob Smith, Sydney Richardson, Miaofang Chi, Frank Abild-Pedersen, Stacey F. Bent, Matteo Cargnello

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 38· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Rhodium (Rh) is an extremely precious metal, well-known for its catalytic properties that make it indispensable in emission control systems. During their lifetime, Rh catalysts are exposed to high-temperature oxidizing environments. When supported on alumina, this leads to significant deactivation via the formation of rhodium aluminates (RhAl x O y ). However, the mechanism underlying the formation of such species remains a matter of debate. One leading hypothesis posits that Rh mobility on the support allows it to find defective alumina sites where it is converted into RhAl x O y, while others attribute this process to more generic Rh–alumina interfacial sites. In this work, we combine colloidally synthesized Rh nanocrystals with atomic layer deposition (ALD) of Al 2 O 3 and ZrO 2 to precisely engineer Rh/oxide interfaces and study their involvement in catalyst deactivation via RhAl x O y formation. We find that reducing the mobility of Rh nanoparticles via metal oxide encapsulation (ALD of Al 2 O 3 or ZrO 2 atop supported Rh catalysts) does not improve the catalyst stability. By modifying a ZrO 2 support with increasing amounts of Al 2 O 3 layers by ALD and subsequently depositing Rh nanocrystals, we find a correlation between the formation of RhAl x O y and the amount of deposited alumina. This observation suggests that a dissolution-based mechanism is responsible for catalyst deactivation and that the process is not interface-limited. Finally, by depositing Rh nanoparticles onto an alumina support coated with <0.3 wt % ZrO 2, we reduce the Rh–Al 2 O 3 interface and therefore catalyst deactivation, achieving a catalyst that remains 4 times more active after aging when compared to Rh/Al 2 O 3 .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Advancements in Battery Materials · Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering

Stanford University

SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

Department of Chemistry

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Department of Applied Physics

Eindhoven University of Technology

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Department of Energy Science and Engineering

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences · U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences · SLAC Scientific Data Facility (SDF) · US Department of Energy, Office of Science User Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory · National Science Foundation

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. SFA (Oxford). Rhodium Market and Rhodium Price. https://www.sfa-oxford.com/platinum-group-metals/rhodium-market-and-rhodium-price-drivers/ (accessed Dec 08, 2025).
2. Bessudnov, A. Rhodium Material Flow Analysis. Master’s Thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology: Lappeenranta, Finland, 2017. https://lutpub.lut.fi/handle/10024/143986 (accessed Dec 08, 2025).
3. 10.1016/0021-9517(83)90274-910.1016/0021-9517(83)90274-9 ↗
4. Cooper, B. J.; Harrison, B.; Shutt, E.; Lichtenstein, I. The Role of Rhodium in Rh/Pt Catalysts for CO/HC/NOx and SO4= Emission Control─The Influence of Oxygen on Catalyst Performance , SAE Technical Paper 770367; SAE International, 1977.10.4271/770367 ↗
5. IMARC Group. Rhodium Market Size, Share, Trends and Forecast to 2033, IMARC Group Noida, India, 2023. https://www.imarcgroup.com/rhodium-market (accessed Dec 08, 2025).
6. Sasu, D. D. Global Rhodium Demand by Industry 2010─Statista, Nov 27, 2025. https://www.statista.com/statistics/591974/demand-for-rhodium-worldwide-by-industry (accessed Dec 08, 2025).
7. U.S. Department of Energy. Notice of Final Determination on DOE Critical Materials List, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 149, 51792–51798 Aug 4, 2023. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/08/04/2023-16611/notice-of-final-determination-on-2023-doe-critical-materials-list.
8. Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 Establishing a Framework for Ensuring a Secure and Sustainable Supply of Critical Raw Materials and Amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020, Official Journal of the European Union, L 2024/1252, May 3, 2024. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/oj (accessed Dec 08, 2025).
9. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0351310.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03513 ↗
10. 10.1016/0021-9517(77)90053-710.1016/0021-9517(77)90053-7 ↗
11. 10.1021/j100375a05510.1021/j100375a055 ↗
12. 10.1016/0021-9517(89)90133-410.1016/0021-9517(89)90133-4 ↗
13. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0169510.1021/acscatal.1c01695 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41929-019-0283-x10.1038/s41929-019-0283-x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.10.01010.1016/j.cattod.2016.10.010 ↗
16. 10.1006/jcat.1997.195410.1006/jcat.1997.1954 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12282110.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122821 ↗
18. 10.1002/cphc.20130053710.1002/cphc.201300537 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0221910.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02219 ↗
20. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0628910.1021/acscatal.2c06289 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0153510.1021/acsanm.3c01535 ↗
22. 10.1039/C6CY01272H10.1039/C6CY01272H ↗
23. 10.1039/C4CY01032A10.1039/C4CY01032A ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c0141610.1021/acs.cgd.4c01416 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.11.04410.1016/j.tsf.2007.11.044 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacsau.2c0059510.1021/jacsau.2c00595 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja00215a01010.1021/ja00215a010 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.43760310.1063/1.437603 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
30. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
32. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.23514910.1103/PhysRevB.85.235149 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.08110110.1103/PhysRevB.82.081101 ↗
35. 10.1021/acscatal.3c0323910.1021/acscatal.3c03239 ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.1c1024810.1021/jacs.1c10248 ↗
37. 10.1021/jacsau.4c0075910.1021/jacsau.4c00759 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1230110.1103/PhysRevB.59.12301 ↗
40. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0369910.1021/acscatal.1c03699 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41597-019-0081-y10.1038/s41597-019-0081-y ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14661710.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146617 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0521910.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05219 ↗
44. 10.1038/ijos.2015.2010.1038/ijos.2015.20 ↗
45. Zhang P. · Int. J. Eng. Res. Sci. · 2015 · 1 · 18
46. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0509910.1021/acscatal.0c05099 ↗
47. 10.1021/cs200257p10.1021/cs200257p ↗
48. 10.1021/cs500330p10.1021/cs500330p ↗
49. 10.1002/cctc.20140235610.1002/cctc.201402356 ↗
50. 10.1006/jcat.1997.173810.1006/jcat.1997.1738 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.09.11210.1016/j.cplett.2005.09.112 ↗