Molecular Insights Shaping the Design of Metal–Organic Framework-Based Electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Understanding the molecular determinants of Li + transport in quasi-solid-state electrolytes (QSSEs) is critical for the design of next-generation energy storage materials. Here, we investigate Li + conduction in an isoreticular series of anionic metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), Li 3 [(Cu 4 Cl) 3 L 8 ] (L 3– = linker), to disentangle the effects of pore size and linker functionality on ion conductivity. Contrary to expectation based on previous studies, despite their structural differences, the MOFs show pore size-independent Li + conductivity, whereas the linker functional groups can impose an effect. Using 7 Li magic-angle-spinning solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance, we identify the major Li + conducting species residing in the open pore channels, which, upon the addition of propylene carbonate, display liquid-like transport with low activation energies. The similar local environments and liquid-like dynamics of these species give rise to conductivities on the order of 10 –5 S/cm across the isoreticular series, though the interactions between tetrazolate nitrogens in linkers and Li + restrict ion mobility, leading to a modest decrease in conductivity. This study provides molecular-level insights into Li + transport in anionic MOF-based electrolytes and thus establishes the design principles for developing efficient QSSEs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry
Princeton University
Columbia University
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · National Science Foundation (NSF)
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20200864410.1002/adfm.202008644 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.5b0763610.1021/acsami.5b07636 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20190677010.1002/adfm.201906770 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0030510.1021/acsenergylett.6b00305 ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.2c0371010.1021/jacs.2c03710 ↗
6. 10.1021/jacs.7b0619710.1021/jacs.7b06197 ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.9b1041810.1021/jacs.9b10418 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20180888510.1002/anie.201808885 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.5c1297910.1021/jacs.5c12979 ↗
10. 10.1021/jacs.8b1341810.1021/jacs.8b13418 ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20220060210.1002/smll.202200602 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c0338410.1021/acs.chemmater.4c03384 ↗
13. 10.1039/D3TA06986A10.1039/D3TA06986A ↗
14. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-080619-01281110.1146/annurev-matsci-080619-012811 ↗
15. 10.1021/jacs.5c1487110.1021/jacs.5c14871 ↗
16. 10.1039/c1cc14118j10.1039/c1cc14118j ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20060436210.1002/anie.200604362 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b0171610.1021/acs.cgd.6b01716 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1131710.1021/acsnano.4c11317 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41586-024-08140-210.1038/s41586-024-08140-2 ↗
21. 10.1039/D5SC07238G10.1039/D5SC07238G ↗
22. 10.1021/ja065685310.1021/ja0656853 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.3c1032610.1021/jacs.3c10326 ↗
24. 10.1039/D0TA00121J10.1039/D0TA00121J ↗
25. 10.1021/jacs.0c1025810.1021/jacs.0c10258 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20200587810.1002/adma.202005878 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0229010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02290 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja028109p10.1021/ja028109p ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2019.07.00210.1016/j.ssnmr.2019.07.002 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0139610.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01396 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.44013610.1063/1.440136 ↗