journal article·2026-07-14

Design of Experiments-Based Optimization of Crystallographic and Physical Characteristics of Atomic Layer Deposition-Grown TiO 2 Thin Films

Hazal Gergeroglu, Karina Ashurbekova, Ensieh Iranmehr, Wenwen Wang, Mato Knez

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 38· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

In ATomic Layer Deposition (ALD) processes, one-factor-at-a-time tuning remains standard, inflating experimental cost and time, and masking factor interactions. Here, a Taguchi L9 (3 3 ) design is employed to map how cycle number (A: 100/250/400), temperature (B: 170/180/190 °C), and pulse time (C: 10/15/20 ms) influence phase composition and thickness/roughness of ALD-grown titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) on Si. Reflectivity was modeled using Parratt recursion with Nevot-Croce roughness in Advanced Material Analysis and Simulation Software (AMASS), and signal-to-noise ( S / N ) optimization applied the “smaller is better” criterion. Across the matrix, thickness is primarily set by A, rising from 4 to 5 nm at 100 cycles to 16–17 nm at 400 cycles, while the roughness percentage decreases as films thicken (14–20 to 3.7–4.0%); B and C tune the rutile content. Interaction plots revealed B × C coupling for rutile content and roughness, while Factor A showed additive effects. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) attributed 99.7 and 97.1% of variance in thickness and roughness to A, and rutile variance mainly to B (41.5%) and C (40.9%). Confirmation experiments validated predictions: A 1 B 3 C 2 minimized rutile (26.2 vs 25.1% predicted), A 1 B 1 C 1 minimized thickness (4.20 nm), and A 3 B 1 C 2 yielded the lowest roughness (3.63%). These results deliver statistically supported process windows for ultrathin, low-roughness, anatase-rich TiO 2 and outline a minimal-experiment strategy transferable to other ALD systems for controlling crystallography and film characteristics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Optical Coatings and Gratings

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CIC nanoGUNE, Tolosa Hiribidea 76, E-20018 Donostia−San Sebastian, Spain

INL, International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, Av. Mestre Jose Veiga s/n, 4715-330 Braga, Portugal

IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigaci?n · NextGenerationEU

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/nano1304070410.3390/nano13040704 ↗
2. 10.1039/D2RA07839B10.1039/D2RA07839B ↗
3. 10.1016/j.inoche.2021.10850510.1016/j.inoche.2021.108505 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jssc.2023.12395210.1016/j.jssc.2023.123952 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.14120610.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141206 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10772210.1016/j.jece.2022.107722 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10888010.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108880 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15521410.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155214 ↗
9. 10.53523/ijoirVol10I3ID34910.53523/ijoirVol10I3ID349 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15502310.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155023 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15651910.1016/j.apsusc.2023.156519 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tsf.2023.13988310.1016/j.tsf.2023.139883 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tsf.2020.13821510.1016/j.tsf.2020.138215 ↗
14. Pinna N. · 2012
15. 10.1002/admi.20240040810.1002/admi.202400408 ↗
16. 10.1088/1361-6641/aa78ce10.1088/1361-6641/aa78ce ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tsf.2021.13875810.1016/j.tsf.2021.138758 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0362110.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03621 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0490510.1021/acs.jpcc.2c04905 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10854-021-06278-710.1007/s10854-021-06278-7 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11664-023-10628-y10.1007/s11664-023-10628-y ↗
22. 10.3390/ma1604153910.3390/ma16041539 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10876-019-01651-310.1007/s10876-019-01651-3 ↗
24. Antony J. · 2023
25. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.17510.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.175 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00170-023-11794-310.1007/s00170-023-11794-3 ↗
27. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/44/44540110.1088/0957-4484/19/44/445401 ↗
28. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/19/19540110.1088/0957-4484/20/19/195401 ↗
29. 10.1116/6.000032710.1116/6.0000327 ↗
30. 10.1116/1.486821510.1116/1.4868215 ↗
31. Davis R. · 2018 · 137
32. 10.1007/s42250-020-00173-010.1007/s42250-020-00173-0 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11291710.1016/j.rser.2022.112917 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10721310.1016/j.measurement.2019.107213 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.00510.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.005 ↗
36. Karna S. K. · Int. J. Eng. Math. Sci. · 2012 · 1 · 1
37. 10.1038/s41598-025-94919-w10.1038/s41598-025-94919-w ↗
38. 10.1038/s41598-026-38067-910.1038/s41598-026-38067-9 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41598-026-42714-610.1038/s41598-026-42714-6 ↗
40. 10.1007/s44199-024-00093-910.1007/s44199-024-00093-9 ↗
41. 10.1037/a001582610.1037/a0015826 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0169-4332(00)00842-410.1016/S0169-4332(00)00842-4 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.03.05510.1016/j.jcis.2020.03.055 ↗
44. 10.1021/cm035140x10.1021/cm035140x ↗
45. 10.1007/s10853-010-5113-010.1007/s10853-010-5113-0 ↗
46. 10.1007/s13538-015-0383-210.1007/s13538-015-0383-2 ↗
47. Montgomery D. C. · 2021
48. Williams C. K. I. · 2006 · 2