journal article·2026-05-12

Construction of Biomimetic Porous Membranes Inspired by Honeycomb for Selective Adsorption and Recovery of Rare Earth Ions

Haonan Qu, Xiaoci Yan, Govindasami Periyasami, Sijin Li, Ehsan Bahojb Noruzi, Haifan Zhang, Cuiguang Ma, Qiang He, Yuchao Liu, Zhihang Zhao, Xiaowei Mao, Jing Cheng, Haibing Li

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 38· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Rare earth ions (REIs) possess significant strategic and economic values. Given the dual demands of national strategy and economic development, effective recovery of REIs is of great significance in alleviating the current shortage of rare earth resources. The DCGO-PES membrane (Deeply Carboxylated Graphene Oxide Composite Poly(ether sulfone) Membrane) for rare earth ion (REI) adsorption was fabricated via a bionic honeycomb-inspired strategy. In this process, deeply carboxylated GO (DCGO) served as both a three-dimensional support material and a “structure-directing agent”, while the membrane matrix was formed by doping 3% DCGO into the poly(ether sulfone) (PES) matrix. The adsorption performance of DCGO-PES membranes was investigated using rare earth ions Sm 3+, Tm 3+, and Tb 3+ as models. The results showed that the carboxyl groups introduced via the nucleophilic substitution reaction in the membrane had good binding ability to REIs, endowing DCGO-PES membranes with good selectivity, which could effectively separate REIs even in mixed ion solutions. Further studies via adsorption kinetics, isothermal adsorption, and thermodynamic experiments confirmed that the adsorption of DCGO-PES membranes was monolayer adsorption dominated by chemical adsorption. The maximum adsorption capacities for Sm 3+, Tm 3+, and Tb 3+ reached 41.46 mg/g, 30.28 mg/g, and 33.78 mg/g, respectively. In addition, the membrane exhibited good cyclic stability and maintained its good REI adsorption performance after five cycles. More importantly, it was easy to recover, overcoming the drawback of the high recovery cost of DCGO powder. Wheat seed germination and zebrafish toxicity experiments further intuitively verified the good adsorption effect of DCGO-PES membranes on REIs. The establishment of this method provides an economical and environmentally friendly approach for the adsorption and recovery of REIs, and also offers a theoretical basis for the application of membrane materials in the recovery of other REIs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extraction and Separation Processes · Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis · Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry

Central China Normal University

Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

Hubei Key Laboratory of Environmental and Health Effects of Persistent Toxic Substances School of Environment and Health

Jianghan University

Funding

the Research Fund of Jianghan University, and the State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, RCEES, CAS · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.solmat.2024.11292110.1016/j.solmat.2024.112921 ↗
2. 10.1002/cjoc.20240013110.1002/cjoc.202400131 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmst.2024.08.04410.1016/j.jmst.2024.08.044 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jre.2023.03.01710.1016/j.jre.2023.03.017 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.21609610.1016/j.ccr.2024.216096 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmst.2023.09.00310.1016/j.jmst.2023.09.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.envres.2016.05.05210.1016/j.envres.2016.05.052 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12163210.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121632 ↗
9. 10.3390/resources304061410.3390/resources3040614 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41893-022-01014-310.1038/s41893-022-01014-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.15510.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.155 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.13721310.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137213 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.11134610.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111346 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.advmem.2022.10003110.1016/j.advmem.2022.100031 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11777210.1016/j.seppur.2020.117772 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cscee.2021.10010210.1016/j.cscee.2021.100102 ↗
17. 10.1252/jcej.39.15410.1252/jcej.39.154 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13661710.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136617 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma1524881810.3390/ma15248818 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c0021710.1021/acs.accounts.5c00217 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ceja.2020.10000910.1016/j.ceja.2020.100009 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10763310.1016/j.jece.2022.107633 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.13273810.1016/j.seppur.2025.132738 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.surfin.2025.10748610.1016/j.surfin.2025.107486 ↗
25. 10.3390/polym1406110210.3390/polym14061102 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.13129810.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.131298 ↗
27. 10.1007/s40820-024-01544-910.1007/s40820-024-01544-9 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2024.10888510.1016/j.porgcoat.2024.108885 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.12056310.1016/j.memsci.2022.120563 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jece.2025.11799510.1016/j.jece.2025.117995 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.05.05110.1016/j.seppur.2013.05.051 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.05.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.05.001 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11244210.1016/j.matdes.2023.112442 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11431-015-5869-110.1007/s11431-015-5869-1 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2569710.1002/pc.25697 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.16073210.1016/j.apsusc.2024.160732 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2024.10140810.1016/j.mtphys.2024.101408 ↗
38. 10.1039/d1ta04882a10.1039/d1ta04882a ↗
39. 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.10327610.1016/j.surfin.2023.103276 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jre.2022.08.02110.1016/j.jre.2022.08.021 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.46521110.1016/j.chroma.2024.465211 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.12325810.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123258 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11558410.1016/j.molliq.2021.115584 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.13141510.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.131415 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.13459310.1016/j.seppur.2025.134593 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c0652910.1021/acs.jafc.4c06529 ↗