Electron-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of Tunable TiC x N y Ternary Nitride Films Using Tetrakis(dimethylamido)titanium with Ammonia Reactive Background Gas
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Electron-enhanced atomic layer deposition (EE-ALD) of amorphous, tunable titanium carbonitride (TiC x N y ) films was obtained at low temperatures. The TiC x N y EE-ALD was achieved using sequential exposures of tetrakis(dimethylamido)titanium (TDMAT) and low-energy electrons in the presence of a continuous NH 3 reactive background gas (RBG). The composition of the TiC x N y films was tuned by varying the NH 3 background pressure and the electron exposure time. The TiC x N y EE-ALD was performed by utilizing a hollow cathode plasma electron source (HC-PES). The HC-PES delivered a high electron flux into background gases at pressures up to several mTorr. TDMAT was used as the source of Ti, C, and N. The NH 3 RBG served as both a source of additional N and a method for the removal of C from the TiC x N y films. The TiC x N y EE-ALD film growth was monitored using in situ ellipsometry. The TiC x N y EE-ALD was conducted at low temperatures that never exceeded 130 °C, using NH 3 pressures from 0 to 3 mTorr. The C content in the TiC x N y films could be tuned using the NH 3 RBG pressure. Lower NH 3 pressures led to the incorporation of more C into the TiC x N y films. The C:Ti ratio varied from ∼0.3 to ∼0.05 versus NH 3 RBG pressure, as measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), at a constant electron exposure time of 10 s. Electron exposure time was also used to modulate the C content in the TiC x N y films. Shorter electron exposures led to more C incorporation. The C:Ti ratio varied from ∼2 to ∼0.1 versus electron exposure time, as measured by XPS at a constant NH 3 background pressure of 2 mTorr. In situ 4-wavelength and ex situ spectroscopic ellipsometry were able to estimate electrical resistivities for the TiC x N y films. Resistivity was reduced from >2000 μΩ cm to ∼200 μΩ cm with decreasing C content. X-ray reflectivity (XRR) measurements were able to determine film densities. The film density for TiN films was 4.6 g/cm 3, and the film density decreased with increasing C content. The C content in the TiC x N y films could also be varied using a CH 4 RBG. Carbon could be added by carbon EE-chemical vapor deposition (EE-CVD) using electron exposures together with a CH 4 RBG. The carbon could also be removed by carbon EE-chemical vapor etching (EE-CVE) using electron exposures together with NH 3 RBG. The C content in the TiC x N y films was difficult to control using a supercycle approach with TiN EE-ALD and carbon EE-CVD.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry
University of Colorado Boulder
Funding
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · Semiconductor Research Corporation
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0067610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00676 ↗
2. 10.1116/1.500669610.1116/1.5006696 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0079610.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00796 ↗
4. 10.1116/6.000103310.1116/6.0001033 ↗
5. 10.1116/1.511371110.1116/1.5113711 ↗
6. 10.1116/6.000293810.1116/6.0002938 ↗
7. 10.1116/6.000272610.1116/6.0002726 ↗
8. 10.1016/0167-5729(91)90013-N10.1016/0167-5729(91)90013-N ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0234110.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02341 ↗
10. 10.1116/1.295572810.1116/1.2955728 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41598-020-67803-y10.1038/s41598-020-67803-y ↗
12. 10.3762/bjnano.8.24010.3762/bjnano.8.240 ↗
13. 10.1002/cvde.20060658310.1002/cvde.200606583 ↗
14. 10.1038/srep3400310.1038/srep34003 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5c0026410.1021/acs.chemmater.5c00264 ↗
16. 10.1116/1.58808410.1116/1.588084 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)01077-810.1016/S0040-6090(97)01077-8 ↗
18. 10.1143/JJAP.40.465710.1143/JJAP.40.4657 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.34705910.1063/1.347059 ↗
20. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.36310.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.363 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0061770810.1007/BF00617708 ↗
22. 10.1149/1.210882710.1149/1.2108827 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mee.2008.09.03610.1016/j.mee.2008.09.036 ↗
24. 10.1116/1.57979110.1116/1.579791 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.11269310.1063/1.112693 ↗
26. 10.1023/A:100880530505910.1023/A:1008805305059 ↗
27. 10.1179/174329405X4087610.1179/174329405X40876 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.494221610.1063/1.4942216 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.513367110.1063/1.5133671 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0263-4368(01)00027-010.1016/S0263-4368(01)00027-0 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.139415710.1063/1.1394157 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0287810.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02878 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2018.11.00110.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2018.11.001 ↗
34. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-080819-01244410.1146/annurev-matsci-080819-012444 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.05.03410.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.05.034 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2024.10689010.1016/j.ijrmhm.2024.106890 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00533-910.1016/S0040-6090(03)00533-9 ↗
38. 10.1149/2.010406jss10.1149/2.010406jss ↗
39. 10.1149/1.345993210.1149/1.3459932 ↗
40. 10.1116/1.513501410.1116/1.5135014 ↗
41. 10.1116/6.000073110.1116/6.0000731 ↗
42. 10.1111/jace.1228910.1111/jace.12289 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c0178510.1021/acs.analchem.0c01785 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.167770910.1063/1.1677709 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.03.02710.1016/j.ceramint.2014.03.027 ↗
46. 10.1016/0040-6090(83)90319-X10.1016/0040-6090(83)90319-X ↗
47. 10.1088/0953-4075/25/9/02110.1088/0953-4075/25/9/021 ↗
48. 10.3762/bjnano.9.810.3762/bjnano.9.8 ↗
49. 10.1007/s00339-014-8570-510.1007/s00339-014-8570-5 ↗
50. 10.1002/adma.20220491210.1002/adma.202204912 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.34335510.1063/1.343355 ↗
52. 10.1116/1.514285010.1116/1.5142850 ↗
53. 10.1063/5.012214310.1063/5.0122143 ↗
54. 10.1116/6.000340810.1116/6.0003408 ↗
55. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/36/36420110.1088/0953-8984/21/36/364201 ↗