journal article·2026-04-14

Reversible Mn 2+ Dissolution-Deposition in Rechargeable Zn-MnO 2 Cells Revealed by 1 H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Kevin J. Sanders, Breanna L. Pinto, Annie Cheng, Liam McGoldrick, Zeyuan Liu, Rohan Jadhav, Storm W. D. Gourley, Alejandra Ibarra-Espinoza, Caio Miranda Miliante, Wendy Tran, Brian D. Adams, Oleg Rubel, Drew C. Higgins, Gillian R. Goward

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 38· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Aqueous rechargeable zinc-ion batteries with MnO 2 cathodes are well-suited for stationary energy storage; however, Mn 2+ dissolution and related effects during discharge are thought to contribute to decreasing cell performance. The paramagnetic Mn 2+ ion induces large perturbations to the magnetic resonance signature of H 2 O solvent molecules in the electrolyte solution, namely the chemical shift and R 1 relaxation rate. In this work, linear correlations are established between the concentration of Mn 2+ and the 1 H chemical shift and R 1 . This relationship is used to follow the Mn inventory and quantify dissolved Mn 2+ in the cells over many cycles. We show that Mn 2+ dissolution is largely reversible and that Mn 2+ dissolution-redeposition is a primary charge-storage mechanism in these cells. This work develops and implements an in situ methodology to monitor dissolution of Mn 2+ during battery operation, leading to scientific insight into the reaction mechanisms governing the performance and capacity fade of rechargeable Zn-MnO 2 batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced oxidation water treatment · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology

McMaster University

Department of Chemical Engineering

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Salient Energy Inc.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. U.S. U.S. Battery Capacity Increased 66% in 2024 ; Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=64705. (accessed June 10, 2025).
2. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.03510.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.035 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.03810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.038 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.00710.1016/j.joule.2023.06.007 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41598-021-00148-210.1038/s41598-021-00148-2 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mtener.2020.10039610.1016/j.mtener.2020.100396 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13306410.1016/j.cej.2021.133064 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20231844410.1002/anie.202318444 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16740410.1016/j.cej.2025.167404 ↗
10. 10.1002/smtd.20230096510.1002/smtd.202300965 ↗
11. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.3910.1038/nenergy.2016.39 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.13910.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.139 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.10.03910.1016/j.ensm.2021.10.039 ↗
14. 10.1039/D0EE02168G10.1039/D0EE02168G ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20221269510.1002/anie.202212695 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.10.03210.1016/j.elecom.2009.10.032 ↗
17. 10.1021/jz401415a10.1021/jz401415a ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20160431010.1002/anie.201604310 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRev.73.67910.1103/PhysRev.73.679 ↗
20. Bertini I. · 2016
21. 10.1103/PhysRev.99.55910.1103/PhysRev.99.559 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.174377110.1063/1.1743771 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.173168410.1063/1.1731684 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.05.00110.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.05.001 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c0139610.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01396 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.3c0733910.1021/jacs.3c07339 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.12.08210.1016/j.carbon.2021.12.082 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mrl.2023.01.00210.1016/j.mrl.2023.01.002 ↗
29. 10.1002/cmr.a.2146510.1002/cmr.a.21465 ↗
30. 10.1038/srep0606610.1038/srep06066 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c0341810.1021/acs.jpcc.4c03418 ↗