Element-Selective Analysis of Carrier Behavior in Plasmonic Metal–Zinc Oxide (M = Al or Ga) Nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
The ability to correlate changes in free carrier densities with changes in atomic structure in plasmonic semiconducting nanocrystals (NCs) can improve our understanding of these materials and lend insight into their rational design. Zinc oxide (ZnO) is of particular interest in this class of materials because of its uniquely wide band gap, which can be manipulated through the addition of dopants (e.g., Al 3+ and Ga 3+ ). Herein, we demonstrate the utility of solid-state NMR (SSNMR) in tandem with other spectroscopic techniques to probe changes in atomic structure and elucidate the relationship between these changes and free carrier densities in a series of ZnO NCs doped with varying concentrations of Al 3+ and Ga 3+ (i.e., AZO and GZO, respectively). 67 Zn SSNMR is employed to draw comparisons between the bulk ZnO phase and the ZnO NC phases. 67 Zn SSNMR is also employed to study how differences in dopant size and concentration affect dopant deactivation and, hence, free carrier densities and the resulting frequency of the plasmon. 27 Al and 71 Ga SSNMR are employed to probe the effects of dopant incorporation on the zinc oxide lattice and gain insight into the preferred coordination environments of each dopant. In the AZO NCs, four-, five-, and six-coordinate Al 3+ environments are observed, whereas in the GZO NCs, only four- and six-coordinate Ga 3+ environments are identified. In both, higher doping levels result in increased dopant populations in six-coordinate environments. These samples also exhibit the largest distributions of 67 Zn Knight shifts, which is consistent with the highest carrier densities determined from fitting mid-IR localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) extinction spectra, inferring that the nature and populations of the dopants play important roles in their determination. This raises the tantalizing possibility of using such information to rationally design new types of NCs with tunable carrier densities and LSPR frequencies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry
Florida State University
National High Magnetic Field Laboratory
Funding
Division of Chemistry · State of Florida · Division of Materials Research
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2020.10166410.1016/j.ssnmr.2020.101664 ↗
2. 10.1080/10473289.2005.1046465610.1080/10473289.2005.10464656 ↗
3. Poole C. P. · 2003
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0069610.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00696 ↗
5. 10.1021/ja01855a07010.1021/ja01855a070 ↗
6. 10.2174/156802661131304000210.2174/1568026611313040002 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0392410.1021/acsnano.9b03924 ↗
8. 10.1088/0034-4885/72/12/12650110.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126501 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41928-018-0130-010.1038/s41928-018-0130-0 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl203030f10.1021/nl203030f ↗
11. 10.1021/nn502759310.1021/nn5027593 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.37060110.1063/1.370601 ↗
13. 10.1038/ncomms1158310.1038/ncomms11583 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0052910.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00529 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0393310.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03933 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRev.76.1259.210.1103/PhysRev.76.1259.2 ↗
17. 10.1080/1364281990821696810.1080/13642819908216968 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.26.355910.1103/PhysRevB.26.3559 ↗
19. 10.6028/jres.074A.04810.6028/jres.074A.048 ↗
20. 10.1021/cm504809c10.1021/cm504809c ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0944810.1021/acs.jpcc.0c09448 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0542010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05420 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.04520910.1103/PhysRevB.93.045209 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.11521110.1103/PhysRevB.80.115211 ↗
25. 10.1002/adom.20240038810.1002/adom.202400388 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0896210.1021/acsnano.3c08962 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0265510.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02655 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.369599610.1063/1.3695996 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.08.00710.1016/j.jmr.2017.08.007 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRev.94.63010.1103/PhysRev.94.630 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.171629610.1063/1.1716296 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00056-610.1016/S0016-7061(97)00056-6 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.03.00110.1016/j.jmr.2010.03.001 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRev.80.58010.1103/PhysRev.80.580 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.07.01610.1016/j.cplett.2010.07.016 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.02.00610.1016/j.jmr.2019.02.006 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0090610.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00906 ↗
38. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800185-1.00001-210.1016/B978-0-12-800185-1.00001-2 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2018.09.00110.1016/j.ssnmr.2018.09.001 ↗
40. 10.1088/0953-8984/22/6/06540210.1088/0953-8984/22/6/065402 ↗
41. 10.1021/ja907511r10.1021/ja907511r ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.13680210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.136802 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0007910.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00079 ↗
44. Smith M. E. · 2002
45. 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.03.00110.1016/j.jmr.2008.03.001 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)01237-810.1016/S0009-2614(98)01237-8 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.12038310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120383 ↗
48. 10.1039/C8CP01096J10.1039/C8CP01096J ↗
49. 10.1021/jacs.9b1383810.1021/jacs.9b13838 ↗
50. Knight W. D. · 2007 · 1
51. 10.1088/0953-8984/8/50/05110.1088/0953-8984/8/50/051 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.09.02910.1016/j.solmat.2014.09.029 ↗
53. 10.1088/0022-3727/49/41/41300210.1088/0022-3727/49/41/413002 ↗
54. 10.1021/jacs.9b1104510.1021/jacs.9b11045 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10854-022-09040-910.1007/s10854-022-09040-9 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.04.02410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.04.024 ↗
57. 10.1002/cmr.a.2015510.1002/cmr.a.20155 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c0117010.1021/acs.analchem.4c01170 ↗
59. 10.1002/pssb.222077023910.1002/pssb.2220770239 ↗
60. 10.1021/jp072620t10.1021/jp072620t ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0133110.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01331 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2019.10000710.1016/j.mtadv.2019.100007 ↗
63. 10.1080/00268976.2018.142613110.1080/00268976.2018.1426131 ↗