Source abstract
Abstract
Ligand exchange reactions at nanoparticle surfaces are critical to the formation and function of nanomaterials. The kinetics of surface ligand exchange derive from a combination of factors related to local binding site structure and the surface reaction environment. Here, we isolate the contributions of the surface reaction environment by comparing the ligand exchange kinetics of a carbon nanoparticle binding site to that of a molecular analogue with identical binding site structure. Specifically, we synthesize a graphite-conjugated pseudo-octahedral ruthenium complex, GCC-Ru, bearing a single exchangeable phosphine ligand and compare its kinetics of ligand exchange to that of the identical molecular Ru complex. Using a combination of spectroscopies, we establish common molecular coordination environments and oxidation states for GCC-Ru and the molecular analogue and use 19F NMR to interrogate the kinetics and mechanism of ligand exchange. We find that surface conjugation results in a 2- to 3-fold rate enhancement, which derives from compensating changes to ΔH‡ and ΔS‡ for a common dissociative mechanistic pathway. Based on these data, we develop a model that explains these changes to the activation parameters through charge screening by the carbon and its impact on the local solvent environment at the surface binding site. This work highlights the key role of the solvent environment at a conductive surface in facilitating ligand exchange reactions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
Department of Chemistry, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 Cass Avenue, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States
Illinois Institute of Technology, 3300 South Federal Street, Chicago, Illinois 60616, United States
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy · Research Corporation for Science Advancement · Alfred P. Sloan Foundation · Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation · U.S. Department of Health and Human Services · Canadian Institute for Advanced Research · National Science Foundation