Estimation of the performance parameters for a direct methanol fuel cell with Fe–N–C cathodes using gradient boost models
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) represent a promising energy conversion technology that offers compactness, high efficiency, and low emissions that are suitable for portable and clean energy applications. However, high market costs and resource limitations of platinum-group metal (PGM)-based catalysts remain a significant obstacle to their commercialized adoption. Despite PGM-free catalysts attracting recent attention, their design and development remain challenging, largely due to the complex non-linear correlation between control and performance parameters. This paper presents a machine-learning-based surrogate framework to predict the polarization curve and subsequently calculate power densities based on a set of model inputs: (i) temperature, (ii) Nafion concentration, (iii) methanol concentration, (iv) catalyst loading, and (v) current densities. Four separate gradient-boosting machine learning (ML) models, i.e. eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), categorical boosting (CatBoost), histogram gradient-boosting regressor (HistGBR) and a light-gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM), were trained on experimental data corresponding to the set of predefined control parameters. The performance of each model also depends on how their hyperparameters were optimized using Bayesian optimization (BO), a tree-structured Parzen estimator (TPE), and Grey-Wolf Optimization (GWO). Interpolative analysis shows that the Grey-Wolf optimized CatBoost (CatGWO)-model was the best-performing model-optimizer framework, achieving an average R 2 of 99.72% and an average mean absolute relative error of 2.16% with fairly limited standard deviation. To demonstrate its performance for possible out-of-the-range DMFC design applications, the model was subjected to extrapolation study with completely unseen hold-out datasets. Compared with prior studies, our CatGWO framework delivers promising cell-voltage predictions, and demonstrated only a modest gap between hold-in and hold-out performance. The proposed model offers a novel approach to improving the accuracy of machine learning predictions at very low computational latency. Potential applications include rapid pre-screening of operating conditions prior to multi-physics simulations, deployment as a surrogate model for optimization-inverse-AI modelling, and real-time use within model predictive control systems, accelerating the design and operational viability of practical Fe–N–C-based DMFCs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Advances and challenges in alkaline anion exchange membrane fuel cells10.1016/j.pecs.2018.01.001 ↗
2. Design and fabrication of micro-electromechanical system (MEMS)-based μ-DMFC (direct methanol fuel cells) for portable applications: an outlook10.3390/electrochem6020011 ↗
3. Synthesis, characterization and testing of graphene-based materials for proton-exchange membrane fuel cell catalysts
4. Development of nickel-ZIF-8 doped nitrogen reduced graphene oxide catalytic materials for PEM fuel cell10.1115/imece2023-113169 ↗
5. Synthesis and characterization of nitrogen doped reduced graphene oxide based cobalt-ZIF-8 catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction10.1149/10408.0059ecst ↗
6. Jahromi Hassan · 202210.1021/scimeetings.2c00708 ↗
7. Non-platinum group metal oxygen reduction catalysts for a hydrogen fuel cell cathode: a mini-review10.3390/catal15060588 ↗
8. Electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: significant advances, major challenges, and future directions10.1021/acscatal.5c00903 ↗
9. Development of a highly active Fe N C catalyst with the preferential formation of atomic iron sites for oxygen reduction in alkaline and acidic electrolytes10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.081 ↗
10. Performance analysis of a non-platinum group metal catalyst based on iron-aminoantipyrine for direct methanol fuel cells10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.043 ↗
11. DMFC performance and methanol cross-over: experimental analysis and model validation10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.071 ↗
12. Structural optimization and performance trade-off strategies for semi-crystalline sulfonated poly(arylene ether ketone) membranes in high-concentration direct methanol fuel cells10.1016/j.jechem.2023.05.049 ↗
13. Combinatorial search for oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts: a review10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.107 ↗
14. Design, fabrication and testing of a direct methanol fuel cell stack10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.338 ↗
15. A three-dimensional full-cell CFD model used to investigate the effects of different flow channel designs on PEMFC performance10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.05.012 ↗
16. Modelling and analysis of a direct methanol fuel cell with under-rib mass transport and two-phase flow at the anode10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.052 ↗
17. 3D CFD modeling of a PEM fuel cell stack10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.065 ↗
18. A semi-empirical model considering the influence of operating parameters on performance for a direct methanol fuel cell10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.104 ↗
19. Development of semi-empirical cell voltage model for direct methanol fuel cell10.1149/1.2424312 ↗
20. Artificial intelligence models for predicting the performance of proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers under steady and dynamic power10.1088/2515-7655/add95e ↗
21. Artificial intelligence-based model to predict the heat transfer coefficient in flow boiling of liquid hydrogen as fuel and cryogenic coolant in future hydrogen-powered cryo-electric aviation10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133323 ↗
22. Surface nanostructures of Pt-compositionally complex alloy single-crystal model catalyst surfaces for improved oxygen reduction reaction: machine-learning-assisted exploration10.1021/acsami.4c22052 ↗
23. Machine learning-guided design of direct methanol fuel cells with a platinum group metal-free cathode10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235758 ↗
24. Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?
25. Highly stable precious metal-free cathode catalyst for fuel cell application10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.087 ↗
26. Machine learning and Bayesian optimization for performance prediction of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells10.1016/j.egyai.2024.100380 ↗
27. Machine learning modeling for proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100183 ↗
28. Deep learning-based performance modeling of hydrogen fuel cells using artificial neural networks: a comparative study of optimizers10.3390/pr13051453 ↗
29. Proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance prediction using artificial neural network10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.263 ↗
30. A comparison of physical properties and fuel cell performance of Nafion and zirconium phosphate/Nafion composite membranes10.1016/j.memsci.2004.03.009 ↗
31. Operating temperature dependency on performance degradation of direct methanol fuel cells10.1002/fuce.201100184 ↗
32. Temperature and methanol concentration dependences of direct methanol fuel cell performance measured by single cell having reference electrode10.1063/1.3608911 ↗
33. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features
34. A comprehensive machine learning-based investigation for the index-value prediction of 2G HTS coated conductor tapes10.1088/2632-2153/ad45b1 ↗
35. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
36. Investigation on the heat transfer estimation of subcooled liquid hydrogen for transportation applications using intelligent technique10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.257 ↗
37. Machine learning-powered performance monitoring of proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers for enhancing green hydrogen production as a sustainable fuel for aviation industry10.1016/j.egyr.2024.08.028 ↗
38. A streaming parallel decision tree algorithm10.5555/1756006.1756034 ↗
39. A novel scheme for mapping of MVT-Type Pb–Zn prospectivity: LightGBM, a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree machine learning algorithm10.1007/s11053-023-10249-6 ↗
40. Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms
41. Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization
42. Grey wolf optimizer10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 ↗
43. An improved extreme gradient boosting approach to vehicle speed prediction for construction simulation of earthwork10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103351 ↗
44. Parameter estimation of PEM fuel cells employing the hybrid grey wolf optimization method10.1016/j.energy.2019.116616 ↗
45. Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences10.2307/2532427 ↗
46. Comparative performance evaluation of state-of-the-art hyperparameter optimization frameworks10.5370/kiee.2023.72.5.607 ↗
47. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
48. Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 ↗
49. A semi-empirical model of the direct methanol fuel cell performance Part I. Model development and verification10.1016/s0378-7753(03)00558-5 ↗
50. Parameter estimation for empirical and semi-empirical models in a direct ethanol fuel cell10.1016/j.egyr.2023.07.002 ↗
51. Gradient boosted trees with extrapolation10.1109/icmla.2019.00138 ↗
52. Artificial intelligence techniques for the estimation of direct methanol fuel cell performance10.1088/1742-6596/707/1/012048 ↗
53. Advanced CFD analysis of an air-cooled PEM fuel cell stack predicting the loss of performance with time10.1002/fuce.201500163 ↗
54. Convergence criteria establishment for 3D simulation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.11.005 ↗
55. Boosting the output power of PEM fuel cells by identifying best-operating conditions10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116205 ↗
56. Learning-based model predictive energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric bus with health-aware control10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122228 ↗
57. Energy management strategy for fuel cell vehicles based on online driving condition recognition using dual-model predictive control10.3390/s24237647 ↗
58. Self-adaptive digital twin of fuel cell for remaining useful lifetime prediction10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.266 ↗
59. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals10.1016/0041-5553(67)90144-9 ↗