2021 roadmap on lithium sulfur batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Batteries that extend performance beyond the intrinsic limits of Li-ion batteries are among the most important developments required to continue the revolution promised by electrochemical devices. Of these next-generation batteries, lithium sulfur (Li–S) chemistry is among the most commercially mature, with cells offering a substantial increase in gravimetric energy density, reduced costs and improved safety prospects. However, there remain outstanding issues to advance the commercial prospects of the technology and benefit from the economies of scale felt by Li-ion cells, including improving both the rate performance and longevity of cells. To address these challenges, the Faraday Institution, the UK’s independent institute for electrochemical energy storage science and technology, launched the Lithium Sulfur Technology Accelerator (LiSTAR) programme in October 2019. This Roadmap, authored by researchers and partners of the LiSTAR programme, is intended to highlight the outstanding issues that must be addressed and provide an insight into the pathways towards solving them adopted by the LiSTAR consortium. In compiling this Roadmap we hope to aid the development of the wider Li–S research community, providing a guide for academia, industry, government and funding agencies in this important and rapidly developing research space.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Battery employing lithium–sulphur electrodes with non-aqueous electrolyte
2. Building better batteries10.1038/451652a ↗
3. Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities10.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 ↗
4. LigO2 and LigS batteries with high energy storage10.1038/nmat3191 ↗
5. Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries based on multifunctional cathodes and electrolytes10.1038/nenergy.2016.132 ↗
6. Nanostructured sulfur cathodes10.1039/c2cs35256g ↗
7. Approaching energy-dense and cost-effective lithium–sulfur batteries: from materials chemistry and price considerations10.1016/j.energy.2020.117718 ↗
8. Gaines · 2014 · 483
9. Resynthesizing LiFePO4/C materials from the recycled cathode via a green full-solid route10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153292 ↗
10. Carbon with hierarchical pores from carbonized metal–organic frameworks for lithium sulphur batteries10.1039/c3cc38009b ↗
11. Binder free three-dimensional sulphur/few-layer graphene foam cathode with enhanced high-rate capability for rechargeable lithium sulphur batteries10.1039/C4NR00326H ↗
12. Revisiting the role of polysulfides in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/adma.201705590 ↗
13. Anode interface engineering and architecture design for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/adma.201806532 ↗
14. Graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems for energy conversion and storage10.1126/science.1246501 ↗
15. Science and technology roadmap for graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems10.1039/c4nr01600a ↗
16. Electrode design with integration of high tortuosity and sulfur-philicity for high-performance lithium–sulfur battery10.1016/j.matt.2020.04.011 ↗
17. Soluble polysulphide sorption using carbon nanotube forest for enhancing cycle performance in a lithium–sulphur battery10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.024 ↗
18. Intercalation-conversion hybrid cathodes enabling Li–S full-cell architectures with jointly superior gravimetric and volumetric energy densities10.1038/s41560-019-0351-0 ↗
19. Enhanced sulfur transformation by multifunctional FeS2/FeS/S composites for high-volumetric capacity cathodes in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/advs.201800815 ↗
20. Lithium sulfur batteries: elastic sandwich-type rGO–VS2/S composites with high tap density: structural and chemical cooperativity enabling lithium–sulfur batteries with high energy density10.1002/aenm.201870046 ↗
21. Challenges and key parameters of lithium–sulfur batteries on pouch cell level10.1016/j.joule.2020.02.006 ↗
22. Lithium–sulfur batteries: attaining the critical metrics10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.001 ↗
23. Gravimetric and volumetric energy densities of lithium–sulfur batteries10.1016/j.coelec.2017.10.007 ↗
24. A comprehensive understanding of lithium–sulfur battery technology10.1002/adfm.201901730 ↗
25. A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries10.1038/nmat2460 ↗
26. Amphiphilic surface modification of hollow carbon nanofibers for improved cycle life of lithium sulfur batteries10.1021/nl304795g ↗
27. Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon promoted chemical adsorption of sulfur and fabrication of high-areal-capacity sulfur cathode with exceptional cycling stability for lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/adfm.201302631 ↗
28. Improving lithium–sulphur batteries through spatial control of sulphur species deposition on a hybrid electrode surface10.1038/ncomms4943 ↗
29. Non-encapsulation approach for high-performance Li–S batteries through controlled nucleation and growth10.1038/s41560-017-0005-z ↗
30. Minimizing the electrolyte volume in Li–S batteries: a step forward to high gravimetric energy density10.1002/aenm.201801560 ↗
31. Cathode porosity is a missing key parameter to optimize lithium–sulfur battery energy density10.1038/s41467-019-12542-6 ↗
32. Sulfur–mesoporous carbon composites in conjunction with a novel ionic liquid electrolyte for lithium rechargeable batteries10.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.007 ↗
33. Carbon–sulfur composites for Li–S batteries: status and prospects10.1039/c3ta11045a ↗
34. Porous hollow carbon@sulfur composites for high-power lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/anie.201100637 ↗
35. High capacity vertical aligned carbon nanotube/sulfur composite cathodes for lithium–sulfur batteries10.1039/c2cc17925c ↗
36. Graphene oxide as a sulfur immobilizer in high performance lithium/sulfur cells10.1021/ja206955k ↗
37. A highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries10.1038/ncomms6682 ↗
38. Advances in cathode materials for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries10.1016/j.isci.2018.07.021 ↗
39. Recent progress in developing Li2S cathodes for Li–S batteries10.1016/j.ensm.2020.02.010 ↗
40. Status and challenges in enabling the lithium metal electrode for high-energy and low-cost rechargeable batteries10.1038/s41560-017-0047-2 ↗
41. Before Li ion batteries10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00422 ↗
42. High energy rechargeable Li–S cells for EV application: status, remaining problems and solutions10.1149/1.3414001 ↗
43. On the surface chemical aspects of very high energy density, rechargeable Li–sulfur batteries10.1149/1.3148721 ↗
44. Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries10.1038/s41586-019-1481-z ↗
45. Dead lithium: mass transport effects on voltage, capacity, and failure of lithium metal anodes10.1039/C7TA00371D ↗
46. Liquid cell transmission electron microscopy observation of lithium metal growth and dissolution: root growth, dead lithium and lithium flotsams10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.001 ↗
47. Transition of lithium growth mechanisms in liquid electrolytes10.1039/C6EE01674J ↗
48. Polysulfide shuttle study in the Li/S battery system10.1149/1.1806394 ↗
49. The synergetic effect of lithium polysulfide and lithium nitrate to prevent lithium dendrite growth10.1038/ncomms8436 ↗
50. Polymère carbone-soufre: synthèse et propriétés électrochimiques
51. Towards high-performance solid-state Li–S batteries: from fundamental understanding to engineering design10.1039/C9CS00635D ↗
52. A solid future for battery development10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
53. Three-dimensional bilayer garnet solid electrolyte based high energy density lithium metal–sulfur batteries10.1039/C7EE01004D ↗
54. Flexible electrolyte-cathode bilayer framework with stabilized interface for room-temperature all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries10.1016/j.ensm.2018.11.009 ↗
55. Ionic conductivity promotion of polymer electrolyte with ionic liquid grafted oxides for all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries10.1039/C7TA03699J ↗
56. Stabilization of all-solid-state Li–S batteries with a polymer–ceramic sandwich electrolyte by atomic layer deposition10.1039/C8TA09069F ↗
57. Interfacial reactions and performance of Li7La3Zr2O12-stabilized Li–sulfur hybrid cell10.1021/acsami.9b11439 ↗
58. Performance improvement of all-solid-state Li–S batteries with optimizing morphology and structure of sulfur composite electrode10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.135 ↗
59. High-performance Li–SeS x all-solid-state lithium batteries10.1002/adma.201808100 ↗
60. Cathode-supported all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries with high cell-level energy density10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00430 ↗
61. High-energy long-cycling all-solid-state lithium metal batteries enabled by silver–carbon composite anodes10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗
62. Formation of lithium polysulfides in aprotic media10.1016/0022-1902(77)80198-X ↗
63. Predicting the composition and formation of solid products in lithium–sulfur batteries by using an experimental phase diagram10.1039/C6CC05881G ↗
64. Probing the lithium–sulfur redox reactions: a rotating-ring disk electrode study10.1021/jp500382s ↗
65. The importance of chemical reactions in the charging process of lithium–sulfur batteries10.1149/2.0181807jes ↗
66. A new class of solvent-in-salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries10.1038/ncomms2513 ↗
67. What limits the rate capability of Li–S batteries during discharge: charge transfer or mass transfer?10.1149/2.0011801jes ↗
68. Which process limits the operation of a Li–S system?10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03255 ↗
69. Simultaneous monitoring of crystalline active materials and resistance evolution in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1021/jacs.9b11500 ↗
70. Recent advances in electrolytes for lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/aenm.201500117 ↗
71. Discharging a Li-S battery with ultra-high sulphur content cathode using a redox mediator10.1038/srep32433 ↗
72. Functional organosulfide electrolyte promotes an alternate reaction pathway to achieve high performance in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/anie.201511830 ↗
73. The use of redox mediators for enhancing utilization of Li2S cathodes for advanced Li–S battery systems10.1021/jz500222f ↗
74. Designing a quinone-based redox mediator to facilitate Li2S oxidation in Li–S batteries10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.018 ↗
75. Three-dimensional growth of Li2S in lithium–sulfur batteries promoted by a redox mediator10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04189 ↗
76. Keggin-type polyoxometalates as bidirectional redox mediators for rechargeable batteries10.5796/electrochemistry.84.882 ↗
77. Combined mediator and electrochemical charging and discharging of redox targeting lithium–sulfur flow batteries10.1016/j.mtener.2017.04.006 ↗
78. Organic polysulfides based on −S−S−S− structure as additives or cosolvents for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries10.1002/celc.201800196 ↗
79. Small molecule organic semiconductors on the move: promises for future solar energy technology10.1002/anie.201102326 ↗
80. Redox-flow batteries: from metals to organic redox-active materials10.1002/anie.201604925 ↗
81. Lithium–oxygen batteries and related systems: potential, status, and future10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00609 ↗
82. A review on separators for lithiumsulfur battery: progress and prospects10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.044 ↗
83. Dynamic formation of a solid–liquid electrolyte interphase and its consequences for hybrid-battery concepts10.1038/nchem.2470 ↗
84. Advanced chemical strategies for lithium–sulfur batteries: a review10.1016/j.gee.2017.08.002 ↗
85. Lithium–sulphur batteries with a microporous carbon paper as a bifunctional interlayer10.1038/ncomms2163 ↗
86. From hollow carbon spheres to N-doped hollow porous carbon bowls: rational design of hollow carbon host for Li–S batteries10.1002/aenm.201502539 ↗
87. Cerium based metal–organic frameworks as an efficient separator coating catalyzing the conversion of polysulfides for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries10.1021/acsnano.8b08155 ↗
88. Strong sulfur binding with conducting magnéli-phase Ti n O2n–1 nanomaterials for improving lithium–sulfur batteries10.1021/nl502331f ↗
89. Enhancing catalytic activity of titanium oxide in lithium–sulfur batteries by band engineering10.1002/aenm.201900953 ↗
90. Powering lithium–sulfur battery performance by propelling polysulfide redox at sulfiphilic hosts10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04166 ↗
91. Efficient trapping and catalytic conversion of polysulfides by VS4 nanosites for Li–S batteries10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00076 ↗
92. Mitigation of shuttle effect in Li–S battery using a self-assembled ultrathin molybdenum disulfide interlayer10.1021/acsami.8b19354 ↗
93. Investigation of short-circuit scenarios in a lithium-ion battery cell10.1149/2.096206jes ↗
94. Zhang · 2014 · 40910.1016/B978-0-444-59513-3.00018-2 ↗
95. Warner · 2019 · 13910.1016/b978-0-12-814778-8.00007-7 ↗
96. Cellulose separators with integrated carbon nanotube interlayers for lithium–sulfur batteries: an investigation into the complex interplay between cell components10.1149/2.0301914jes ↗
97. Recent advances in functional modification of separators in lithium–sulfur batteries10.1039/C7DT04717G ↗
98. Polyaniline-modified hydrolyzed polyethylene separators for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries10.1149/MA2019-01/4/494 ↗
99. Polyaniline-grafted hydrolysed polyethylene as a dual functional interlayer/separator for high-performance Li–S@C core–shell batteries10.1039/C9CC07725A ↗
100. A functional interlayer as a polysulfides blocking layer for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries10.1039/C7NJ03675B ↗