Influence of electrode processing and electrolyte composition on multiwall carbon nanotube negative electrodes for sodium ion batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nanostructured one-dimensional multiwall-carbon nanotubes have a variety of advantageous properties including good electrical conductivity and mechanical strength, and thus have been widely investigated for use in lithium-ion battery electrodes as conductive and microstructural additives, though they also possess some electrochemical activity. Their application to sodium-ion batteries has been less extensively researched, and therefore a greater understanding of the electrochemical reaction with sodium, and effects of slurry composition and electrolyte formulation is warranted, especially as these are likely components in future Na-ion electrode formulations. Here, we report the fabrication of aqueous and organic multi-wall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) negative electrodes processed by ball milling. The binder of choice is noted to greatly affect the electrochemical performance, both in terms of capacity retention and rate capability over a range of current densities from 25 to 500 mA g −1 . Switching from a carbonate- to diglyme-based electrolyte considerably improves initial coulombic efficiencies (∼10%–60%), attributed to less extensive formation of solid electrolyte interphase, and enables a reversible mechanism with capacities up to 150 mAh g −1 over 100 cycles depending upon the binder used. Ex-situ characterization of the discharged and cycled carbon nanotubes by powder x-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy provide an insight into how MWCNTs undergo sodiation and demonstrate a partially reversible structural transformation during cycling when using the diglyme-based electrolyte. This work lays the foundation for a better understanding of these versatile materials, especially when used in the most promising alternative energy storage technology to lithium ion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Vikström · Appl. Energy · 2013 · 110 · 25210.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.005 ↗
2. Peters · Batteries · 2019 · 5 · 1010.3390/batteries5010010 ↗
3. Rudola · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 9 · 827910.1039/D1TA00376C ↗
4. Tapia-Ruiz · J. Phys. Energy · 2021 · 310.1088/2515-7655/ac01ef ↗
5. CATL Unveils its Latest Breakthrough Technology by Releasing its First Generation of Sodium-Ion Batteries
6. Park · Front. Chem. · 2020 · 8 · 110.3389/fchem.2020.00001 ↗
7. Moriwake · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 710.1039/C7RA06777A ↗
8. Lao · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 110.1002/adma.201700622 ↗
9. Fang · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 1010.1002/aenm.201902485 ↗
10. Senguttuvan · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 410910.1021/cm202076g ↗
11. Desai · ChemSusChem · 2020 · 13 · 486610.1002/cssc.202001334 ↗
12. Dou · Mater. Today · 2019 · 23 · 8710.1016/j.mattod.2018.12.040 ↗
13. Bai · Energy Storage Mater. · 2018 · 13 · 27410.1016/j.ensm.2018.02.002 ↗
14. Xiong · Materials · 2013 · 6 · 113810.3390/ma6031138 ↗
15. Motojima · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1993 · 62 · 232210.1063/1.109634 ↗
16. Zeng · Carbon · 1998 · 36 · 25910.1016/S0008-6223(97)00167-X ↗
17. Mubarak · J. Ind. Eng. Chem. · 2014 · 20 · 118610.1016/j.jiec.2013.09.001 ↗
18. Licht · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2016 · 2 · 16210.1021/acscentsci.5b00400 ↗
19. Fuente-Cuesta · Sustain. Energy Fuels · 2019 · 3 · 260410.1039/C9SE00258H ↗
20. Boaretto · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 869510.1021/acsaem.0c01267 ↗
21. Landi · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2009 · 2 · 63810.1039/b904116h ↗
22. Suresh Babu · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2014 · 161 · A104510.1149/2.075406jes ↗
23. Suo · Carbon · 2019 · 151 · 110.1016/j.carbon.2019.05.030 ↗
24. Luo · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 310.1039/C5TA00727E ↗
25. Vijaya Kumar Saroja · Nano Lett. · 2018 · 18 · 568810.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02275 ↗
26. Jache · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 1810.1039/C6CP00651E ↗
27. Alptekin · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2022 · 910.1002/admi.202101267 ↗
28. Ould · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2021 · 6010.1002/anie.202111215 ↗
29. Brunauer · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1938 · 60 · 30910.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
30. Barrett · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1951 · 73 · 37310.1021/ja01145a126 ↗
31. Lastoskie · J. Phys. Chem. · 1993 · 97 · 478610.1021/j100120a035 ↗
32. Weaving · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 3 · 747410.1021/acsaem.0c00867 ↗
33. Bokobza · C—J. Carbon Res. · 2015 · 1 · 7710.3390/c1010077 ↗
34. Kiang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 186910.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1869 ↗
35. Zhen · Nano Energy · 2020 · 7410.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104895 ↗
36. Kruk · Langmuir · 1997 · 13 · 626710.1021/la970776m ↗
37. Oktaviano · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 2210.1039/c2jm34684b ↗
38. Wang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2007 · 17 · 361310.1002/adfm.200700319 ↗
39. Darjazi · Energies · 2020 · 13 · 621610.3390/en13236216 ↗
40. Wang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2022 · 3210.1002/adfm.202110862 ↗
41. Fan · Electrochim. Acta · 2015 · 174 · 97010.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.039 ↗
42. Yang · Electrochim. Acta · 2008 · 53 · 223810.1016/j.electacta.2007.09.040 ↗
43. Goktas · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 810.1002/aenm.201702724 ↗
44. Xie · Prog. Energy · 2020 · 210.1088/2516-1083/aba5f5 ↗
45. Bommier · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 588810.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01969 ↗
46. Piriya · ACS Omega · 2018 · 3 · 994510.1021/acsomega.8b01407 ↗
47. Rangom · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 1110.1021/acsami.9b07449 ↗
48. Jache · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2014 · 5310.1002/anie.201403734 ↗
49. Nacimiento · Dalt. Trans. · 2019 · 48 · 541710.1039/C9DT00563C ↗
50. Pan · JACS Au · 2021 · 1 · 120810.1021/jacsau.1c00158 ↗
51. Li · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2021 · 910.1039/D1TA02836G ↗
52. Chen · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2021 · 14 · 224410.1039/D0EE03916K ↗
53. Zhang · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 37010.1039/C6EE03367A ↗
54. Kim · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2015 · 25 · 53410.1002/adfm.201402984 ↗
55. Kim · J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 11 · 1410.33961/jecst.2019.00619 ↗
56. Wang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 11110.1021/jp074464w ↗
57. Wang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 935310.1021/acsami.7b17893 ↗
58. Singh · Diam. Relat. Mater. · 2010 · 19 · 128110.1016/j.diamond.2010.06.003 ↗
59. Popova · Coke Chem. · 2017 · 60 · 36110.3103/S1068364X17090058 ↗
60. Eom · Carbon · 2004 · 42 · 258910.1016/j.carbon.2004.05.039 ↗
61. Zheng · J. Power Sources · 2022 · 53210.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231357 ↗
62. Eshetu · ChemSusChem · 2016 · 9 · 46210.1002/cssc.201501605 ↗
63. Seh · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2015 · 1 · 44910.1021/acscentsci.5b00328 ↗
64. Westman · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 1 · 267110.1021/acsaem.8b00360 ↗
65. Jensen · Batter. Supercaps · 2020 · 3 · 130610.1002/batt.202000144 ↗
66. Yoong · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 2008 · 39 · 118310.1002/jrs.1961 ↗
67. Hardwick · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 2008 · 69 · 123210.1016/j.jpcs.2007.10.017 ↗
68. Anji Reddy · ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 285110.1021/acsenergylett.8b01761 ↗
69. Chacón-Torres · Phys. Status Solidi · 2014 · 251 · 233710.1002/pssb.201451477 ↗
70. Influence of electrode processing and electrolyte composition on multiwall carbon nanotube negative electrodes for sodium ion batteries