journal article·2020-01-01Open access

CO2 and steam electrolysis using a microtubular solid oxide cell

Hernán Monzón, Miguel A Laguna-Bercero

Journal of Physics: Energy· Volume 2· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Nickel-yttria stabilized zirconia (Ni-YSZ) supported tubes were fabricated by plastic extrusion molding (PEM). YSZ was used as the electrolyte and LSM-YSZ (lanthanum-strontium doped manganite) as the oxygen electrode. Both layers were deposited by dip coating and were then sintered at 1500 °C and 1150 °C, respectively. Coelectrolysis experiments were performed in these cells at 850 °C, using different fuel gas conditions varying the amount of steam, carbon dioxide, nitrogen and hydrogen. Area specific resistance (ASR) values ranged from 0.47 Ωcm2, when rich steam and CO2 flows are used, to 1.74 Ωcm2, when a diluted composition is used. Gas chromatography was used to examine the amount of H2 and CO in the output gas. The obtained results are consistent with the equilibrium of the water gas shift reaction. For all the different analysed conditions, faradaic efficiency was found to be close to 100%. This experiment confirmed that there is no electronic conduction taking place through the YSZ electrolyte. The threshold for electronic conduction in the diluted feeding conditions (Poor H2O and CO2) for these particular YSZ-based cell was found at voltages of about 1.65 V.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Ebbesen · Chem. Rev. · 2014 · 114 · 1069710.1021/cr5000865 ↗
2. Götz · Renewable Energy · 2016 · 85 · 137110.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066 ↗
3. Zheng · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2017 · 46 · 142710.1039/C6CS00403B ↗
4. O’Brien · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2009 · 34 · 421610.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.12.021 ↗
5. Kim-Lohsoontornv · Curr. Appl Phys. · 2011 · 11 · S22310.1016/j.cap.2010.11.114 ↗
6. Graves · Solid State Ion. · 2011 · 192 · 39810.1016/j.ssi.2010.06.014 ↗
7. Stoots · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2009 · 34 · 420810.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.029 ↗
8. Fu · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2010 · 3 · 138210.1039/c0ee00092b ↗
9. Kendall · Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. · 2010 · 7 · 110.1111/j.1744-7402.2008.02350.x ↗
11. Orera · Front. Energy Res. · 2014 · 2 · 2210.3389/fenrg.2014.00022 ↗
12. Sarkar · Int J App. Ceram Technol · 2007 · 4 · 10310.1111/j.1744-7402.2007.02129.x ↗
13. Suzuki · J Fuel Cell Sci Tech · 2010 · 710.1115/1.3206974 ↗
14. Singhal · 2003
15. Lee · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2016 · 41 · 753010.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.122 ↗
16. Yu · Chem. Eng. J. · 2018 · 335 · 4110.1016/j.cej.2017.10.110 ↗
17. Chen · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 401810.1039/C4EE02786H ↗
18. Lei · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2017 · 5 · 290410.1039/C6TA10252B ↗
19. Monzón · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2014 · 39 · 547010.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.010 ↗
20. Arias-Serrano · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 1900710.1039/C5RA28183K ↗
21. Monzon · Electrochim. Acta · 2016 · 222 · 162210.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.150 ↗
22. Monzon · Proceedings from 11th European SOFC & SOE Forum · 2014 · 16
23. Laguna-Bercero · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2010 · 157 · B85210.1149/1.3332832 ↗
24. Laguna‐Bercero · Fuel Cells · 2011 · 11 · 11610.1002/fuce.201000069 ↗
25. Virkar · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2010 · 35 · 952710.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.058 ↗
26. Schefold · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2009 · 156 · B89710.1149/1.3138701 ↗
27. Laguna-Bercero · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2011 · 36 · 305110.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.07.082 ↗
28. Kazempoor · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2015 · 40 · 359910.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.126 ↗