journal article·2015-01-02

Strongly Nonlinear Dependence of Energy Transfer Rate on sp2 Carbon Content in Reduced Graphene Oxide-Quantum Dot Hybrid Structures

Yitong Dong, Dong Hee Son

Publisher page

Abstract

The dependence of the energy transfer rate on the content of sp(2)-hybridized carbon atoms in the hybrid structures of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) and Mn-doped quantum dot (QD(Mn)) was investigated. Taking advantage of the sensitivity of QD(Mn)'s dopant luminescence lifetime only to the energy transfer process without interference from the charge transfer process, the correlation between the sp(2) carbon content in RGO and the rate of energy transfer from QD(Mn) to RGO was obtained. The rate of energy transfer showed a strongly superlinear increase with increasing sp(2) carbon content in RGO, suggesting the possible cooperative behavior of sp(2) carbon domains in the energy transfer process as the sp(2) carbon content increases.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States

Funding

Directorate for Engineering

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Geim A. K. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 18310.1038/nmat1849 ↗
2. Castro Neto A. H. · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
3. Novoselov K. S. · Nature · 2005 · 438 · 19710.1038/nature04233 ↗
4. Dai L. M. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2013 · 46 · 3110.1021/ar300122m ↗
5. Xiang Q. J. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2012 · 41 · 78210.1039/C1CS15172J ↗
6. Konstantatos G. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 36310.1038/nnano.2012.60 ↗
7. Hu C. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2014 · 317 · 64810.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.161 ↗
8. Li X. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2014 · 313 · 87710.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.096 ↗
9. Xiang Q. J. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 75310.1021/jz302048d ↗
10. Stankovich S. · Carbon · 2007 · 45 · 155810.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 ↗
11. Hwang J. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 672410.1002/adma.201302495 ↗
12. Schniepp H. C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 853510.1021/jp060936f ↗
13. Yu J. G. · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 340710.1039/c3ta14493c ↗
14. Chen D. · Chem. Rev. · 2012 · 112 · 602710.1021/cr300115g ↗
15. Zhang J. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 458410.1021/nl301831h ↗
16. Lightcap I. V. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2013 · 46 · 223510.1021/ar300248f ↗
17. Chang H. X. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 487210.1002/adma.201002229 ↗
18. Guo S. R. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2013 · 23 · 519910.1002/adfm.201203652 ↗
19. Chen Z. Y. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 296410.1021/nn1005107 ↗
20. Jing P. T. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 291910.1021/jz401460j ↗
21. Morales-Narvaez E. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 298710.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.081 ↗
22. Kundu S. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 2398710.1021/jp405712p ↗
23. Lightcap I. V. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 710910.1021/ja3012929 ↗
24. Maiti S. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 1822610.1021/jp505162c ↗
25. Debgupta J. · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 361510.1039/c3nr00363a ↗
26. Lakowicz J. R. · 200610.1007/978-0-387-46312-4 ↗
27. Eda G. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 50510.1002/adma.200901996 ↗