Thermodynamic Preference for Atom Adsorption on versus Intercalation into Multilayer Graphene
Source abstract
Abstract
The thermodynamic preference of a foreign atom for adsorption on versus intercalation into a graphitic surface is of fundamental and widespread interest. From an exhaustive first-principles density functional theory investigation for 38 typical elements over the periodic table, we reveal a quasilinear correlation between the Shannon effective ionic radius and the chemical-potential difference for a single atom from adsorption to intercalation at multilayer graphene surfaces. A critical Shannon radius is found to be around 0.10 nm, below (above) which intercalation (adsorption) is more favorable for elements with ionic-like bonding after intercalation. Single atoms with van der Waals-biased bonding show some deviation from the linear relationship, while single atoms for the elements with covalent-like bonding do not favor intercalation relative to adsorption. An energy decomposition analysis indicates that the chemical-potential difference determining the thermodynamic preference of a foreign atom for adsorption versus intercalation results from the competition between the electronic and elastic strain effects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
Ames Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Shenzhen Basic Research Fund
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2015.07.00110.1016/j.progsurf.2015.07.001 ↗
2. 10.1039/C9NR03721G10.1039/C9NR03721G ↗
3. 10.1073/pnas.120888910910.1073/pnas.1208889109 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.481778110.1063/1.4817781 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0784810.1021/acsnano.5b07848 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.07010.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.070 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl301916410.1021/nl3019164 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.140970111110.1073/pnas.1409701111 ↗
9. 10.1039/C3NR04178F10.1039/C3NR04178F ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.14700310.1103/PhysRevLett.115.147003 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41563-020-0631-x10.1038/s41563-020-0631-x ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.05340310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.053403 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1253310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12533 ↗
14. 10.1039/C8NR10549A10.1039/C8NR10549A ↗
15. 10.1088/1361-6528/aae1e310.1088/1361-6528/aae1e3 ↗
16. 10.1116/1.512492710.1116/1.5124927 ↗
17. 10.1088/1367-2630/ab687a10.1088/1367-2630/ab687a ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.03317510.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033175 ↗
19. 10.1107/S056773947600155110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0447210.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04472 ↗
21. 10.1038/371683a010.1038/371683a0 ↗
22. 10.1002/anie.19971808110.1002/anie.199718081 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.9b0315510.1021/jacs.9b03155 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0166-1280(09)80008-010.1016/S0166-1280(09)80008-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.03210.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.032 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.728810.1103/PhysRevB.28.7288 ↗