Formation of Pd Monomers and Dimers on a Single-Crystal Pd3Fe(111) Surface
Source abstract
Abstract
Surface reconstruction of binary alloys is important in heterogeneous catalysis because it modifies both surface composition and structure and thus affects the catalytic activity and selectivity. We report here on segregation and surface morphology at a Pd 3 Fe(111) single-crystal model catalyst investigated by low-energy ion scattering (LEIS) and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). Annealing in vacuum causes Pd segregation, and STM reveals a complex surface structure with 0.17 monolayers of Pd monomer and dimer adatoms on top of the outermost alloy layer. This result is explained by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which reveal that the contribution from vibrational free energy causes Pd atoms to detach from step edges at high temperature (>1200 K) and then become trapped at room temperature at Fe defect sites due to a large diffusion barrier. This adlayer structure differs from surface structures observed for other binary alloy systems and is likely to offer new opportunities for manipulating catalytic properties of bimetallic alloys.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Center for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Bertolini J. C. · Surf. Sci. · 1993 · 287 · 34610.1016/0039-6028(93)90800-Y ↗
2. Bachir R. · Appl. Catal., A · 1997 · 164 · 31310.1016/S0926-860X(97)00182-8 ↗
3. Guczi L. · Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. · 1988 · 38 · 8510.1016/S0167-2991(09)60646-7 ↗
4. Shao M.-H. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 352610.1021/ja060167d ↗
5. Zhou W.-P. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1275510.1021/ja9039746 ↗
6. Shao M. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 677210.1021/jp0689971 ↗
7. Bertolini J. C. · 2002 · 10 · 404
8. Rodriguez J. A. · 2002 · 10 · 438
9. Baddeley C. J. · 2002 · 10 · 495
10. Schmid M. · 2002 · 10 · 118
11. Schmid M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 70 · 144110.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1441 ↗
12. Bartels L. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 79 · 69710.1103/PhysRevLett.79.697 ↗
13. Reuter K. · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 65 · 03540610.1103/PhysRevB.65.035406 ↗
14. Ruban A. V. · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 1599010.1103/PhysRevB.59.15990 ↗
15. Steltenpohl A. · Surf. Sci. · 2000 · 454 · 55810.1016/S0039-6028(00)00259-4 ↗
16. Derry G. N. · Surf. Sci. · 1995 · 326 · 5910.1016/0039-6028(94)00724-1 ↗
17. Derry G. N. · Surf. Sci. · 2004 · 566 · 86210.1016/j.susc.2004.06.022 ↗
18. Kellogg G. L. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 166210.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1662 ↗
19. Fallis M. C. · Surf. Sci. · 1994 · 311 · L71710.1016/0039-6028(94)91415-X ↗