Nanopore-Based Sensors for Detecting Toxicity of a Carbon Nanotube to Proteins
Source abstract
Abstract
A carbon nanotube (CNT) can be toxic to a living cell by binding to proteins and then impairing their functionalities; however, an efficient screening method that examines binding capability of a CNT to protein molecules in vitro is still unavailable. Here, we show that a nanopore-based sensor can be used to investigate CNT-protein interactions. With proof-of-principle molecular dynamics simulations, we have measured ionic currents in a nanopore when threading a CNT-protein complex through the pore, and demonstrated that CNT's binding capability, and thus potential nanotoxicity, can be inferred from current signals. We have then further investigated mechanics and energetics of CNT-protein interactions with the nanopore sensor. These findings indicate that solid-state nanopores have the potential to be ultra-sensitive and high-throughput sensors for nanotoxicity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Computational Biology Center, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, United States
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Nel A. · Science · 2006 · 311 · 62210.1126/science.1114397 ↗
2. Porter A. E. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 71310.1038/nnano.2007.347 ↗
3. Zuo G. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 750810.1021/nn101762b ↗
4. Ge C. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2011 · 108 · 1696810.1073/pnas.1105270108 ↗
5. Branton D. · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2008 · 26 · 114610.1038/nbt.1495 ↗
6. Meller A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2000 · 97 · 107910.1073/pnas.97.3.1079 ↗
7. Storm A. J. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 119310.1021/nl048030d ↗
8. Wanunu M. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 80710.1038/nnano.2010.202 ↗
9. Yusko E. C. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 25310.1038/nnano.2011.12 ↗
10. Manrao E. A. · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2012 · 30 · 34910.1038/nbt.2171 ↗
11. Wang Y. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 66810.1038/nnano.2011.147 ↗
12. Hall A. R. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 244610.1021/nl200873w ↗
13. Sun Y. P. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2002 · 35 · 109610.1021/ar010160v ↗
14. Phillips J. C. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2005 · 26 · 178110.1002/jcc.20289 ↗
15. Macias M. J. · Nat. Struct. Biol. · 2000 · 7 · 37510.1038/75144 ↗
16. Aksimentiev A. · Biophys. J. · 2005 · 88 · 374510.1529/biophysj.104.058727 ↗
17. Isralewitz B. · Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. · 2001 · 11 · 22410.1016/S0959-440X(00)00194-9 ↗
18. Park S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 120 · 594610.1063/1.1651473 ↗
19. Jarzynski C. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 269010.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690 ↗
20. Zuo G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1232210.1021/jp2026303 ↗
21. Hornblower B. · Nat. Methods · 2007 · 4 · 31510.1038/nmeth1021 ↗
22. Zhao Q. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 168010.1021/nl070668c ↗