journal article·2012-03-15

C–H Bond Activation of Methane via σ–d Interaction on the IrO2(110) Surface: Density Functional Theory Study

Chia-Ching Wang, Shih Syong Siao, Jyh-Chiang Jiang

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C· Volume 116· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

The adsorption and dissociation of methane on the IrO 2 (110) surface were investigated by density functional theory calculations. The adsorption energy of methane obtained in this study is −0.41 eV on the stoichiometric surface and −0.63 eV on the oxygen-rich surface, which are significantly higher than those calculated recently on other different catalytic systems. Analyses from density of states and electron density difference show a special interaction between the C–H bonding orbital and the d z 2 orbital of surface iridium atom. In addition, the first hydrogen atom abstraction of methane by the IrO 2 (110) surface is a reaction with low barrier and high exothermic energy. The lower reaction barrier than the desorption energy indicates that the IrO 2 (110) surface could provide not only high sticking coefficient but also high turnover frequency in methane dissociation reaction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43, Keelung Road, Section 4, Taipei, 106, Taiwan

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Dave N. · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 1995 · 34 · 103710.1021/ie00043a005 ↗
2. Pitchai R. · Catal. Rev. · 1986 · 28 · 1310.1080/03602458608068085 ↗
3. Amenomiya Y. · Catal. Rev. – Sci. Eng. · 1990 · 32 · 16310.1080/01614949009351351 ↗
4. Juurlink L. B. F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 86810.1103/PhysRevLett.83.868 ↗
5. Gee A. T. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 118 · 333410.1063/1.1538184 ↗
6. Au C. T. · J. Catal. · 1999 · 185 · 1210.1006/jcat.1999.2498 ↗
7. Ciobica I. M. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2000 · 104 · 336410.1021/jp993314l ↗
8. Ciobica I. M. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 620010.1021/jp013210m ↗
9. Zhang C. J. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 116 · 32210.1063/1.1423663 ↗
10. Zhang C. J. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 116 · 428110.1063/1.1449942 ↗
11. Liu Z. P. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 195810.1021/ja0207551 ↗
12. Anghel A. T. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 11341010.1103/PhysRevB.71.113410 ↗
13. Bunnik B. S. · J. Catal. · 2006 · 242 · 30910.1016/j.jcat.2006.06.015 ↗
14. Knapp D. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1731110.1021/jp8039862 ↗
15. Nave S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 05470510.1063/1.3297885 ↗
16. Blanco-Rey M. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 130 · 01470510.1063/1.3046683 ↗
17. van Grootel P. W. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1302710.1021/jp2033774 ↗
18. Chin Y. H. · J. Catal. · 2011 · 283 · 1010.1016/j.jcat.2011.06.011 ↗
19. Mayernick A. D. · J. Catal. · 2011 · 278 · 1610.1016/j.jcat.2010.11.006 ↗
20. Kokalj A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 1673210.1021/ja045169h ↗
21. Xing B. · J. Catal. · 2011 · 282 · 7410.1016/j.jcat.2011.05.027 ↗
22. Gajewski G. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 135 · 06470710.1063/1.3624524 ↗
23. Kinnunen N. M. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1919710.1021/jp204360c ↗
24. Wang C.-C. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1858810.1021/jp1067846 ↗
25. Mattheiss L. F. · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 243310.1103/PhysRevB.13.2433 ↗
26. Ryden W. D. · Phys. Rev. B · 1970 · 1 · 149410.1103/PhysRevB.1.1494 ↗
27. He Y. B. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1194610.1021/jp803607y ↗
28. Chen R. S. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2004 · 271 · 10510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.07.036 ↗
29. Chung W. H. · Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 604 · 11810.1016/j.susc.2009.10.027 ↗
30. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 1311510.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115 ↗
31. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
32. Kresse G. · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
33. Perdew, J. P.InElectronic Structure of Solids ’91;Ziesche, P.; Eschrig, H., Eds.Akademie Verlag:Berlin, 1991; p11.
34. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
35. Wang C.-C. · Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 1425310.1021/la203339z ↗
36. Xing B. · J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. · 2010 · 315 · 18710.1016/j.molcata.2009.09.010 ↗
37. The computational parameters and the surface modelinJ. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113,2816was adopted for calculations on the RuO2(110) surface. For the calculations on TiO2(110) surface, the surface model was also a 2 × 1 slab model with the same layer thickness and vacuum space in this work; it was calculated using the same computational settings described herein.