Distance-Dependent Energy Transfer between Ga2O3 Nanocrystal Defect States and Conjugated Organic Fluorophores in Hybrid White-Light-Emitting Nanophosphors
Source abstract
Abstract
We report a quantitative analysis and development of hybrid white-light-emitting nanoconjugates, prepared by functionalizing colloidal γ-Ga 2 O 3 nanocrystals with selected organic fluorophores. Using the Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) formalism, we studied the coupling of native defect states in Ga 2 O 3 nanocrystals, as energy donors, with different orange-red-emitting fluorophores bound to nanocrystal surfaces, as energy acceptors. Variations in the average nanocrystal size and dye surface coverage were used to characterize the efficiency of the energy transfer process and the corresponding donor–acceptor separations. The results show that for approximately three rhodamine B molecules per nanocrystal the energy transfer efficiency increases from 23% to 49% by decreasing the NC size from 5.3 to 3.6 nm. These FRET efficiencies correspond to the estimated donor–acceptor distances of 3.55 ± 0.02 and 2.99 ± 0.03 nm, respectively. Similar trends were observed for ATTO 590-conjugated Ga 2 O 3 nanocrystals, although ATTO 590 proved to be a more effective energy acceptor owing to a larger molar extinction coefficient in the conjugated form. The size-dependent luminescence of Ga 2 O 3 nanocrystals and the control of FRET parameters through the variations in the bound dye molecules allow for the generation of tunable blue-orange emission, ultimately resulting in white light with targeted chromaticity and high color rendition.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada
Funding
American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Ontario Centres of Excellence
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Holonyak N. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1962 · 1 · 8210.1063/1.1753706 ↗
2. Schubert E. F. · 200610.1017/CBO9780511790546 ↗
3. Azevedo I. L. · Proc. IEEE · 2009 · 97 · 48110.1109/JPROC.2009.2013058 ↗
4. Krames M. R. · IEEE/OSA J. Disp. Technol. · 2007 · 3 · 16010.1109/JDT.2007.895339 ↗
5. Smet P. F. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · R3710.1149/1.3568524 ↗
6. Ye S. · Mater. Sci. Eng., R · 2010 · 71 · 110.1016/j.mser.2010.07.001 ↗
7. Tanabe S. · Proc. SPIE · 2005 · 5941 · 59411210.1117/12.614681 ↗
8. Bachmann V. · Chem. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 207710.1021/cm8030768 ↗
9. Moreno I. · Opt. Express · 2007 · 15 · 360710.1364/OE.15.003607 ↗
10. Xie J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 12110710.1063/1.2988324 ↗
11. Gardner N. F. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 24350610.1063/1.2807272 ↗
12. Monemar B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 18110310.1063/1.2801704 ↗
13. Xie R.-J. · Chem. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 557810.1021/cm061010n ↗
14. Setlur A. A. · Chem. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 331410.1021/cm060898c ↗
15. Huang C.-H. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1869810.1021/jp106693z ↗
16. Li G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 2188210.1021/jp204824d ↗
17. Shunmugam R. · Polym. Adv. Technol. · 2008 · 19 · 59610.1002/pat.1115 ↗
18. Zhen H. · Macromol. Rapid Commun. · 2006 · 27 · 209510.1002/marc.200600565 ↗
19. Setlur A. A. · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 407610.1021/cm100960g ↗
20. Kamtekar K. T. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 57210.1002/adma.200902148 ↗
21. Bowers M. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 1537810.1021/ja055470d ↗
22. Anikeeva P. O. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 219610.1021/nl0703424 ↗
23. Park S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1404310.1021/ja902533f ↗
24. Panda S. K. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 443210.1002/anie.201100464 ↗
25. Smith R. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 304210.1021/nl400597d ↗
26. Sanju K. S. · Chem. Commun. · 2011 · 47 · 128810.1039/C0CC04173D ↗
27. Park J. H. · Nanotechnology · 2004 · 15 · 121710.1088/0957-4484/15/9/018 ↗
28. Maiti D. K. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 2317810.1021/jp409042p ↗
29. Wang T. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 1452010.1021/ja407013z ↗
30. Layek A. · Chem. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 102110.1021/cm504330k ↗
31. Hoffman J. B. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 1845310.1021/jp506757a ↗
32. Clapp A. R. · ChemPhysChem · 2006 · 7 · 4710.1002/cphc.200500217 ↗
33. Wang T. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 925010.1021/ja101333h ↗
34. Wang T. · Chem. Commun. · 2011 · 47 · 716110.1039/c1cc11957e ↗
35. Dave N. · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 13402310.1088/0957-4484/21/13/134023 ↗
36. Wang T. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1847310.1021/jp205502d ↗
37. Hegde M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 14190310.1063/1.3698390 ↗
38. El-Rayyes A. A. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 414 · 28710.1016/j.cplett.2005.07.099 ↗
39. Klein U. K. A. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1976 · 43 · 14110.1016/0009-2614(76)80777-4 ↗
40. Nishikiori H. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1997 · 101 · 368010.1021/jp962734x ↗
41. Lakowicz J. R. · 200610.1007/978-0-387-46312-4 ↗
42. Cantor C. R. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1971 · 68 · 209910.1073/pnas.68.9.2099 ↗
43. Clapp A. R. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 30110.1021/ja037088b ↗
44. Loura L. M. S. · Int. J. Mol. Sci. · 2012 · 13 · 1525210.3390/ijms131115252 ↗
45. Dennis A. M. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 143910.1021/nl080358+ ↗
46. Aldeek F. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 1542910.1021/jp404952x ↗
47. Pons T. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 1532410.1021/ja0657253 ↗
48. Dworak L. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 439610.1021/jp409807x ↗
49. Beane G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 1807910.1021/jp502033d ↗
50. Funston A. M. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 427410.1002/adma.200703186 ↗