journal article·2018-07-26

Determining the Molecular Dipole Orientation on Nanoplasmonic Structures

Thomas A. R. Purcell, Shira Yochelis, Yossi Paltiel, Tamar Seideman

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C· Volume 122· Issue 29
Publisher page

Abstract

We developed a theoretical method to investigate the effects of the orientation of a molecular monolayer on plasmonic systems. Molecular layers strongly alter the plasmonic resonance of nanoparticles, affecting their ability to couple to other nanoparticles and quantum emitters. The ability to understand how the coating impacts the optical properties of the nanostructures is critical for the application of plasmonics in areas such as light detection, sensing, and plasmon-enhanced solar energy conversion. We extend the three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain method to include molecular layers with induced dipoles at an arbitrary orientation relative to the nanostructure’s surface. Numerical calculations show how the orientation of molecular dipoles affects the plasmon resonance of both tetrahedral and ellipsoidal nanoparticles. Finally, we demonstrate how the layer impacts the coupling between ellipsoidal nanoparticle and a colloidal quantum dot.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemistry Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States

Applied Physics Department and the Center for Nanoscience and Nanothechnology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel

Funding

Division of Chemistry · U.S. Department of Energy

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/la010489p10.1021/la010489p ↗
2. 10.1038/nature1215110.1038/nature12151 ↗
3. 10.1002/cphc.20090073310.1002/cphc.200900733 ↗
4. 10.1021/jz200272r10.1021/jz200272r ↗
5. 10.1021/nl070284m10.1021/nl070284m ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061516-04532510.1146/annurev-anchem-061516-045325 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.280456310.1063/1.2804563 ↗
8. 10.1364/OE.21.00A84710.1364/OE.21.00A847 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0329710.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03297 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl100010v10.1021/nl100010v ↗
11. 10.1002/cphc.20110095810.1002/cphc.201100958 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.bios.2012.07.02710.1016/j.bios.2012.07.027 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl049670j10.1021/nl049670j ↗
14. 10.1016/S0925-4005(98)00204-410.1016/S0925-4005(98)00204-4 ↗
15. 10.1021/cr068107d10.1021/cr068107d ↗
16. 10.1021/ja063575q10.1021/ja063575q ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0276710.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02767 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.491384610.1063/1.4913846 ↗
19. 10.1117/1.JPE.5.05700210.1117/1.JPE.5.057002 ↗
20. 10.1038/ncomms264210.1038/ncomms2642 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nantod.2015.02.00710.1016/j.nantod.2015.02.007 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn201529x10.1021/nn201529x ↗
23. 10.1021/nl070284m10.1021/nl070284m ↗
24. 10.1021/ph500032d10.1021/ph500032d ↗
25. 10.1021/jp303560s10.1021/jp303560s ↗
26. 10.1021/ja910239b10.1021/ja910239b ↗
27. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0049810.1021/acsphotonics.6b00498 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0268610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02686 ↗
29. 10.1021/nl802427810.1021/nl8024278 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0658910.1021/acsnano.7b06589 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.08.00910.1016/j.nantod.2010.08.009 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.08541210.1103/PhysRevB.73.085412 ↗
33. 10.1039/c3cs60139k10.1039/c3cs60139k ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0380310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03803 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0778610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07786 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0758310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07583 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0015510.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00155 ↗
38. Taflove A. · 2005
39. 10.1364/AO.37.00527110.1364/AO.37.005271 ↗
40. 10.1039/C3CP43856B10.1039/C3CP43856B ↗
41. 10.1021/nl204055r10.1021/nl204055r ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.04380210.1103/PhysRevA.84.043802 ↗
43. 10.1021/nn405452810.1021/nn4054528 ↗