journal article·2026-01-27

Propylene/Ethylene Separation in Heptanuclear-Nodes Metal Organic Frameworks via a Bifunctional Auxiliary Ligand Strategy

Xingzhe Guo, Xiao-xia Zhang, Weiwei Xu, Nan Ma, Zihao Xing, Rajamani Krishna, Jinfa Chang

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 38· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The methanol-to-olefins (MTO) process is a pivotal technology for producing high-value chemicals like ethylene (C 2 H 4 ) and propylene (C 3 H 6 ) from nonpetroleum resources. A major challenge in this process is the energy-intensive purification of ethylene from a complex MTO product stream. To address this, we developed two isostructural metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), Co 7 -MOF and Ni 7 -MOF, for efficient MTO gas separation using a bifunctional auxiliary ligand strategy. Initially, a two-dimensional (2D) metal–organic layer (MOL) was constructed from isonicotinic acid and a heptanuclear metal cluster (Co 7 or Ni 7 ). The auxiliary ligand, isophthalic acid, was then introduced to serve a dual purpose: it partitions the rhombic pores of the 2D layer into smaller triangular pores and simultaneously pillars the layers into a three-dimensional framework. The successful synthesis and stability of these MOFs were confirmed by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and variable-temperature PXRD. Nitrogen adsorption isotherms revealed their porous nature, with specific surface areas of 680 m 2 g –1 for Co 7 -MOF and 698 m 2 g –1 for Ni 7 -MOF, and a uniform pore size of ∼0.85 nm. Given this suitable pore geometry and charge distribution, we investigated their performance for C 3 H 6 /C 2 H 4 separation. At 298 K and 0.01 bar, the C 3 H 6 uptake reached 31.85 cm 3 g –1 (43.54 cm 3 cm –3 ) for Co 7 -MOF and 36.78 cm 3 g –1 (51.85 cm 3 cm –3 ) for Ni 7 -MOF, surpassing most benchmark materials. Breakthrough experiments and simulations demonstrated that both MOFs can effectively produce high-purity C 2 H 4 from a C 3 H 6 /C 2 H 4 mixture. CP2K calculations elucidated that the separation mechanism is driven by synergistic host–guest interactions, including van der Waals forces between the framework H atoms and gas molecules, interactions between the oxygen atoms of the metal clusters and the H atoms of the gases, and significant C–H···π interactions. This work presents a strategy of bifunctional ligand insertion for designing advanced adsorbents for challenging gas separations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Catalysts for Methane Reforming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Polyoxometalate and Reticular Material Chemistry of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Chemistry

Northeast Normal University

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

Fuyang Normal University

Van‘t Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Funding

Jilin Provincial Scientific and Technological Development Program · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.biteb.2025.10215510.1016/j.biteb.2025.102155 ↗
2. Insel M. A. · 2024 · 5 · 365
3. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.12760010.1016/j.fuel.2023.127600 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16592410.1016/j.cej.2025.165924 ↗
5. 10.1039/D5DT01117E10.1039/D5DT01117E ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20190218110.1002/adma.201902181 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41929-018-0104-710.1038/s41929-018-0104-7 ↗
8. 10.1515/revce-2017-002610.1515/revce-2017-0026 ↗
9. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0555510.1021/acscatal.4c05555 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.21569710.1016/j.ccr.2024.215697 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.11.09610.1016/j.jcis.2023.11.096 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.21629110.1016/j.ccr.2024.216291 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.rser.2023.11328110.1016/j.rser.2023.113281 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c0031110.1021/acscentsci.0c00311 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15473410.1016/j.cej.2024.154734 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12598710.1016/j.seppur.2023.125987 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.08.01410.1016/j.chempr.2022.08.014 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.cgd.8b0140310.1021/acs.cgd.8b01403 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c0007010.1021/acs.accounts.5c00070 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.0c0080510.1021/jacs.0c00805 ↗
21. 10.1021/ja512137t10.1021/ja512137t ↗
22. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.13756910.1016/j.molstruc.2024.137569 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.3c0598010.1021/jacs.3c05980 ↗
24. 10.26599/NRE.2024.912011410.26599/NRE.2024.9120114 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.seppur.2025.13164410.1016/j.seppur.2025.131644 ↗
26. 10.1021/ic401912k10.1021/ic401912k ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15244210.1016/j.cej.2024.152442 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c0011110.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c00111 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20231997810.1002/anie.202319978 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.06.02310.1016/j.micromeso.2013.06.023 ↗
31. 10.1039/D2TA08977G10.1039/D2TA08977G ↗
32. 10.3390/ma1601015410.3390/ma16010154 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14305610.1016/j.cej.2023.143056 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20231165410.1002/anie.202311654 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c0009610.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00096 ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.9b1292410.1021/jacs.9b12924 ↗
37. 10.1021/prechem.2c0000310.1021/prechem.2c00003 ↗
38. 10.1021/cbe.3c0005710.1021/cbe.3c00057 ↗
39. 10.1063/5.000704510.1063/5.0007045 ↗