journal article·2025-05-13Open access

Dopant-Induced Hexagonal to Orthorhombic Phase Transition in Fe2–xMoxP Nanorods and Its Influence on the Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

Jordon Baker, Danyang Wang, Md Kawsar Alam, Ka Un Lao, Indika U. Arachchige

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 37· Issue 9

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Electrochemical water splitting represents a sustainable method for producing molecular hydrogen, a promising clean energy alternative to fossil fuels. Iron phosphides have emerged as earth-abundant catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), where performance can be enhanced by admixing synergetic metals to produce bimetallic catalysts. Herein, we report a theoretical and experimental study that reveals the influence of dopant-induced hexagonal to orthorhombic phase transition on the catalytic activity and stability of Fe 2 P nanorods (NRs) for HER. Among eight metal dopants computationally studied, Mo has been identified as the most promising dopant owing to its optimum hydrogen binding free energy (Δ G H ) on the Fe 2 P (210) surface. Accordingly, hexagonal and orthorhombic Fe 2– x Mo x P NRs ( x = 0–14%) with average lengths and widths ranging from 50.9 ± 22.1 to 92.4 ± 43.8 nm and 3.8 ± 1.0 to 6.3 ± 1.8 nm, respectively, were colloidally synthesized to investigate the structure- and composition-dependent HER activity. Upon incorporation of Mo, the underlying hexagonal Fe 2 P phase transformed into orthorhombic Fe 2– x Mo x P when x ≥ 0.11 (5.41%). The admixture of Mo caused variations in the surface chemistry, leading to a significant decrease in Fe δ+ and P δ− charges. The HER performance was observed to be both phase- and composition-dependent with mixed-phase Fe 2– x Mo x P NRs ( x = 0.03, 0.06, and 0.09) exhibiting superior catalytic activity and overpotentials (η –10 ) of 298, 267, and 222 mV, respectively at a current density ( j ) of −10 mA/cm 2 compared to hexagonal Fe 2 P (η –10 = 378 mV) and orthorhombic Fe 2– x Mo x P (η –10 = 331–459 mV for x = 0.12–0.28) catalysts. The highest HER performance was achieved for Fe 1.91 Mo 0.09 P NRs with a dopant composition of 4.58%, consistent with composition-dependent Δ G H calculations. Although all compositions displayed a Volmer–Heyrovsky HER mechanism, the admixture of Mo improved the HER kinetics, producing the lowest Tafel slope (167.08 mV/dec) for Fe 1.91 Mo 0.09 P NRs. The incorporation of Mo improves the charge transfer resistance and preserves the stability of hexagonal and orthorhombic NRs in alkali environments with a negligible increase in η –10 after 10 h of HER. This study advances the understanding of dopant-induced crystal structure transitions and paves the way for efficient and stable catalytic material design.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry

Virginia Commonwealth University

Funding

Division of Chemistry · Virginia Commonwealth University

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/en1615571210.3390/en16155712 ↗
2. 10.3390/app1310585610.3390/app13105856 ↗
3. 10.1002/er.137210.1002/er.1372 ↗
4. Alternative Fuels Data Center. Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles. https://afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/fuel-cell (accessed April 18, 2025).
5. U.S. Geological Survey. Potential for Geologic Hydrogen for Next-Generation Energy. https://www.usgs.gov/news/featured-story/potential-geologic-hydrogen-next-generation-energy (accessed April 18, 2025).
6. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.15710.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.157 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.05.01210.1016/j.apcata.2006.05.012 ↗
8. 10.1134/S002016850908007X10.1134/S002016850908007X ↗
9. 10.3762/bjnano.5.9610.3762/bjnano.5.96 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.pecs.2016.09.00110.1016/j.pecs.2016.09.001 ↗
11. 10.1007/s41918-022-00161-710.1007/s41918-022-00161-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14542710.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145427 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10013610.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100136 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0355010.1021/acsomega.9b03550 ↗
15. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0493610.1021/acscatal.2c04936 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12028310.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120283 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.11.17510.1016/j.jallcom.2006.11.175 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.05610.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.056 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.25710.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.257 ↗
20. 10.1016/0022-4596(78)90152-410.1016/0022-4596(78)90152-4 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.03.01210.1016/j.jssc.2008.03.012 ↗
22. 10.1143/JPSJ.43.4110.1143/JPSJ.43.41 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRev.78.45810.1103/PhysRev.78.458 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.08.02910.1016/j.ccr.2017.08.029 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0284332010.1007/BF02843320 ↗
26. 10.1039/C5CC09832G10.1039/C5CC09832G ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0138010.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01380 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jiec.2023.11.01210.1016/j.jiec.2023.11.012 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0162410.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01624 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.10927510.1016/j.jece.2023.109275 ↗
31. 10.1039/D4SE00109E10.1039/D4SE00109E ↗
32. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0230110.1021/acscatal.0c02301 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12038610.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120386 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.19710.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.197 ↗
35. 10.1021/nn900574r10.1021/nn900574r ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23241410.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232414 ↗
37. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0195210.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01952 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.01010.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.010 ↗
39. 10.1039/D1TA00372K10.1039/D1TA00372K ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15246010.1016/j.cej.2024.152460 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.16610.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.166 ↗
42. 10.1149/1.185698810.1149/1.1856988 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp501237c10.1021/jp501237c ↗
44. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
45. 10.1002/smll.20220685910.1002/smll.202206859 ↗
46. 10.1021/acscatal.3c0011310.1021/acscatal.3c00113 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.2c0008010.1021/acsmaterialsau.2c00080 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.2c0002510.1021/acsnanoscienceau.2c00025 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c0300310.1021/acs.chemmater.3c03003 ↗
50. 10.1088/0953-8984/7/1/01610.1088/0953-8984/7/1/016 ↗
51. 10.1002/anie.20035356210.1002/anie.200353562 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0162410.1021/acsanm.0c01624 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41467-023-41627-610.1038/s41467-023-41627-6 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.319510.1103/PhysRevB.59.3195 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsaem.4c0053910.1021/acsaem.4c00539 ↗
56. 10.1021/ic00206a02510.1021/ic00206a025 ↗
57. 10.1039/C4EE00957F10.1039/C4EE00957F ↗
58. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0104310.1021/acsaem.9b01043 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.06.08010.1016/j.jmst.2021.06.080 ↗
60. 10.1002/adfm.20200648410.1002/adfm.202006484 ↗
61. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0526410.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05264 ↗
62. 10.1016/0022-0728(93)03043-O10.1016/0022-0728(93)03043-O ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.18310.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.183 ↗
64. 10.1002/celc.20200143610.1002/celc.202001436 ↗
65. 10.1007/BF0072195510.1007/BF00721955 ↗
66. 10.1021/cs501312v10.1021/cs501312v ↗