journal article·2024-04-23Open access

An Experimental Approach to Assess Fluorine Incorporation into Disordered Rock Salt Oxide Cathodes

Raynald Giovine, Eric Yoshida, Vincent C. Wu, Yuefan Ji, Matthew J. Crafton, Bryan D. McCloskey, Raphaële J. Clément

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 36· Issue 8

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Disordered rock salt oxides (DRX) have shown great promise as high-energy-density and sustainable Li-ion cathodes. While partial substitution of oxygen for fluorine in the rock salt framework has been related to increased capacity, lower charge–discharge hysteresis, and longer cycle life, fluorination is poorly characterized and controlled. This work presents a multistep method aimed at assessing fluorine incorporation into DRX cathodes, a challenging task due to the difficulty in distinguishing oxygen from fluorine using X-ray and neutron-based techniques and the presence of partially amorphous impurities in all DRX samples. This method is applied to “Li 1.25 Mn 0.25 Ti 0.5 O 1.75 F 0.25 ” prepared by solid-state synthesis and reveals that the presence of LiF impurities in the sample and F content in the DRX phase is well below the target. Those results are used for compositional optimization, and a synthesis product with drastically reduced LiF content and a DRX stoichiometry close to the new target composition (Li 1.25 Mn 0.225 Ti 0.525 O 1.85 F 0.15 ) is obtained, demonstrating the effectiveness of the strategy. The analytical method is also applied to “Li 1.33 Mn 0.33 Ti 0.33 O 1.33 F 0.66 ” obtained via mechanochemical synthesis, and the results confirm that much higher fluorination levels can be achieved via ball-milling. Finally, a simple and rapid water washing procedure is developed to reduce the impurity content in as-prepared DRX samples: this procedure results in a ca. 10% increase in initial discharge capacity and a ca. 11% increase in capacity retention after 25 cycles for Li 1.25 Mn 0.25 Ti 0.50 O 1.75 F 0.25 . Overall, this work establishes new analytical and material processing methods that enable the development of more robust design rules for high-energy-density DRX cathodes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States

Materials Research Laboratory, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences · Division of Graduate Education · Vehicle Technologies Office · Division of Materials Research

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. IEA · 2023
2. IEA · 2023
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.01910.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019 ↗
4. 10.1038/natrevmats.2018.1310.1038/natrevmats.2018.13 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.02710.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.027 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ensm.2016.10.00710.1016/j.ensm.2016.10.007 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20190386410.1002/aenm.201903864 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.163351110.1149/1.1633511 ↗
9. 10.1039/C9EE02803J.10.1039/C9EE02803J. ↗
10. 10.1038/s41586-018-0015-410.1038/s41586-018-0015-4 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7EE03195E10.1039/C7EE03195E ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.150490111210.1073/pnas.1504901112 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat447910.1038/nmat4479 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20200167110.1002/aenm.202001671 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20180295910.1002/aenm.201802959 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.9b1601110.1021/acsami.9b16011 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.11.00510.1016/j.joule.2021.11.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.10.00110.1016/j.chempr.2019.10.001 ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20170153310.1002/aenm.201701533 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jssc.2008.09.00210.1016/j.jssc.2008.09.002 ↗
21. 10.1149/1.308065910.1149/1.3080659 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20210188810.1002/adfm.202101888 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0379410.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03794 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8EE00816G10.1039/C8EE00816G ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20190324010.1002/aenm.201903240 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.09.10110.1016/j.jcis.2021.09.101 ↗
27. 10.1107/S160057671800018310.1107/S1600576718000183 ↗
28. 10.1039/D0EE03526B10.1039/D0EE03526B ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20200150010.1002/aenm.202001500 ↗
30. 10.1021/jz200352v10.1021/jz200352v ↗
31. 10.1002/mrc.98410.1002/mrc.984 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0147410.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01474 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0311510.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03115 ↗
34. 10.1039/D0TA07836K10.1039/D0TA07836K ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.02910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.029 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.0c2010510.1021/acsami.0c20105 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ssi.2019.01.03710.1016/j.ssi.2019.01.037 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-022-32983-w10.1038/s41467-022-32983-w ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22820410.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228204 ↗
40. 10.1149/2.1121910jes10.1149/2.1121910jes ↗
41. 10.1002/celc.20210089110.1002/celc.202100891 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0509610.1021/acs.chemmater.8b05096 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.01210.1016/j.ensm.2020.07.012 ↗
44. 10.1039/D3RA05684H10.1039/D3RA05684H ↗
45. 10.1038/s41467-017-01115-010.1038/s41467-017-01115-0 ↗
46. 10.1039/D0TA06415G10.1039/D0TA06415G ↗
47. 10.1002/aenm.20220320710.1002/aenm.202203207 ↗
48. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac60f310.1149/1945-7111/ac60f3 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.04.01310.1016/j.nanoen.2015.04.013 ↗