journal article·2023-10-10

Unlocking the Separation Capacities of a 3D-Iron-Based Metal Organic Framework Built from Scarce Fe4O2 Core for Upgrading Natural Gas

Himan Dev Singh, Piyush Singh, Raviraju Vysyaraju, Bhubesh Murugappan Balasubramaniam, Deepak Rase, Pragalbh Shekhar, Aleena Jose, Arvind Rajendran, Ramanathan Vaidhyanathan

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 35· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Methane is an important alternative fuel, and upgrading it to improve fuel efficiency is an imperative target. Solid sorbents capable of selectively removing the major impurities CO 2 and N 2 from the natural gas contribute immensely to this process. We report a porous 3D iron-MOF built by linking scarce Fe 4 O 18 N 2 clusters through readily available terephthalate and diaminotrizaole ligands. The 1-D channels with a high density of polarizing amine groups, aromatic rings, and carboxylate oxygen adsorb CO 2 and the even less polarizable CH 4 . The MOF uptakes 4.7 mmol/g of CO 2 at 273 K, 1 bar, with an optimal heat of adsorption of ≈24.5 kJ/mol and CO 2 /N 2 IAST selectivity of ≈26. At higher pressures, the MOF exhibits a Langmuir type isotherm for methane and nitrogen with a CH 4 /N 2 IAST selectivity of ≈4. The MOF’s excellent cyclic stability is affirmed by the TGA- and iso-cycling. Modeling studies propound the amine’s interactions with the CO 2, but more dominant is the CO 2 ···CO 2 cooperative interactions. At 20 bar, CH 4 interacts with many framework sites through weak dispersive interactions. In contrast, N 2 interacts specifically with the triazole moiety; thus, the MOF favors the former. The CO 2, CH 4, and N 2 diffusion coefficients, calculated using MD simulations, are quite favorable (Dc for CO 2 = 1.11 × 10 –6; CH 4 = 9.04 × 10 –6; N 2 = 1.875 × 10 –5 cm 2 /s). The dynamic breakthrough studies confirm the potential of the Fe-MOF to separate the gas mixtures. With these advantageous sorbent characteristics of this Fe-MOF, we propose using it in a two-stage PSA for the natural gas purification process, Stage I: removal of CO 2 and Stage II: removal of N 2 . The outcomes point to the potential of a readily accessible iron-based amine MOF as sorbent for natural gas upgrading. A process optimization using a 4-step PSA validates the ability of our MOF to yield >96% purity of CH 4 as required for pipeline transportation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Centre for Energy Science, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune 411008, India

Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo, Innovation Centre for Engineering (ICE), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 1H9

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India · Science and Engineering Research Board · Air Force Office of Scientific Research · Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Ministry of Education, India · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune

References (79)

Show source-provided references
1. Carbon Dioxide. https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/ (accessed July 2023).
2. CO2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights; International Energy Agency: 2019.
3. 10.1038/s41598-019-57151-x10.1038/s41598-019-57151-x ↗
4. 10.1038/ngeo250710.1038/ngeo2507 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.00110.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.001 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0047910.1021/acs.accounts.6b00479 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0171410.1021/acs.iecr.1c01714 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jksues.2014.02.00310.1016/j.jksues.2014.02.003 ↗
9. 10.3390/en1316426710.3390/en13164267 ↗
10. 10.1002/aic.1633510.1002/aic.16335 ↗
11. 10.1002/aic.1779410.1002/aic.17794 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0356610.1021/acs.iecr.9b03566 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41586-022-04763-510.1038/s41586-022-04763-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.06.01610.1016/j.petrol.2012.06.016 ↗
15. 10.1021/ie502057k10.1021/ie502057k ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20190450710.1002/anie.201904507 ↗
17. 10.1039/c2cc35729a10.1039/c2cc35729a ↗
18. Ruthven, D. M. Pressure, Swing adsorption; VCH Publishers: New York, 1994; p 235.
19. 10.1038/3508905210.1038/35089052 ↗
20. 10.1080/0149639050028784610.1080/01496390500287846 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.10.02410.1016/j.micromeso.2018.10.024 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.11.05410.1016/j.micromeso.2017.11.054 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.12037710.1016/j.seppur.2021.120377 ↗
24. 10.1557/jmr.2017.29710.1557/jmr.2017.297 ↗
25. 10.1039/C8CC07756H10.1039/C8CC07756H ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.2c0115610.1021/acsami.2c01156 ↗
27. 10.1039/C6RA12280A10.1039/C6RA12280A ↗
28. 10.1002/ange.20220101710.1002/ange.202201017 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13123910.1016/j.cej.2021.131239 ↗
30. 10.1126/science.119423710.1126/science.1194237 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.abi728110.1126/science.abi7281 ↗
32. 10.1039/D0RA09292D10.1039/D0RA09292D ↗
33. 10.1021/ja211825510.1021/ja2118255 ↗
34. 10.1039/b815200d10.1039/b815200d ↗
35. 10.1021/cm301322b10.1021/cm301322b ↗
36. 10.1021/cr200327210.1021/cr2003272 ↗
37. 10.1021/jacs.1c0643410.1021/jacs.1c06434 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c0121610.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01216 ↗
39. 10.1002/ange.20200869610.1002/ange.202008696 ↗
40. 10.1039/C4EE00143E10.1039/C4EE00143E ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.1c0584510.1021/acsami.1c05845 ↗
42. 10.1002/asia.20190102010.1002/asia.201901020 ↗
43. 10.1021/ja909169x10.1021/ja909169x ↗
44. 10.1021/ja101299210.1021/ja1012992 ↗
45. 10.1021/jacs.1c1336810.1021/jacs.1c13368 ↗
46. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.4510.1038/natrevmats.2017.45 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsami.1c0115610.1021/acsami.1c01156 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0169110.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01691 ↗
49. 10.1002/anie.20060227810.1002/anie.200602278 ↗
50. 10.1021/jacs.7b0638210.1021/jacs.7b06382 ↗
51. 10.1039/C6SC00836D10.1039/C6SC00836D ↗
52. 10.1126/sciadv.aax917110.1126/sciadv.aax9171 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0412610.1021/acs.iecr.0c04126 ↗
54. 10.1039/c3cc45828h10.1039/c3cc45828h ↗
55. 10.1002/adma.20170295310.1002/adma.201702953 ↗
56. 10.1039/C1CC15962C10.1039/C1CC15962C ↗
57. 10.1126/science.abc913510.1126/science.abc9135 ↗
58. 10.1038/s41467-019-12414-z10.1038/s41467-019-12414-z ↗
59. 10.1039/C5CC08172F10.1039/C5CC08172F ↗
60. 10.1021/jacs.9b0742210.1021/jacs.9b07422 ↗
61. 10.1021/jacs.6b1045510.1021/jacs.6b10455 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsami.8b0460010.1021/acsami.8b04600 ↗
63. 10.1126/sciadv.aax727010.1126/sciadv.aax7270 ↗
64. 10.1039/c2jm15734a10.1039/c2jm15734a ↗
65. 10.1021/ie101412410.1021/ie1014124 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.03310.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.033 ↗
67. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0126610.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266 ↗
68. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0740710.1021/acs.est.9b07407 ↗
69. 10.1002/chem.20180042410.1002/chem.201800424 ↗
70. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0897110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08971 ↗
71. 10.1002/anie.20100758310.1002/anie.201007583 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.supflu.2021.10537810.1016/j.supflu.2021.105378 ↗
73. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0611010.1021/acs.iecr.0c06110 ↗
74. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b0353410.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03534 ↗
75. 10.1023/A:102387141571110.1023/A:1023871415711 ↗
76. Grande C. A. · Biofuel’s Engineering Process Technology · 2011 · 65
77. 10.1002/cjce.2446910.1002/cjce.24469 ↗
78. 10.1080/00958972.2021.189141510.1080/00958972.2021.1891415 ↗
79. 10.1021/ie302658y10.1021/ie302658y ↗