Composition-Dependent Electrocatalytic Activity of Zn-Doped Ni5P4 Nanocrystals for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrocatalytic water splitting presents an exciting opportunity to produce environmentally benign hydrogen fuel to power human activities. Earth-abundant Ni 5 P 4 has emerged as an efficient catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and its activity can be enhanced by admixing synergistic metals to modify the surface affinity and consequently the kinetics of HER. Computational studies suggest that the HER activity of Ni 5 P 4 can be improved by Zn doping, causing a chemical pressure-like effect on Ni 3 hollow sites. Herein, we report a facile colloidal route to produce Ni 5– x Zn x P 4 nanocrystals (NCs) with control over structure, morphology, and composition and investigate their composition-dependent HER activity in alkaline solutions. Ni 5– x Zn x P 4 NCs retain the hexagonal structure and solid spherical morphology of binary Ni 5 P 4 NCs, with a notable size increase from 9.2–28.5 nm for x = 0.00–1.27 compositions. Elemental maps affirm the homogeneous ternary alloy formation with no evidence of Zn segregation. Surface analysis of Ni 5– x Zn x P 4 NCs indicates significant modulation of the surface polarization upon Zn incorporation, resulting in a decrease in Ni δ+ and an increase in P δ− charges. Although all compositions followed a Volmer–Heyrovsky HER mechanism, the modulated surface polarization enhances the reaction kinetics, producing lower Tafel slopes for Ni 5– x Zn x P 4 NCs (82.5–101.9 mV/dec for x = 0.10–0.84) compared to binary Ni 5 P 4 NCs (109.9 mV/dec). Ni 5– x Zn x P 4 NCs showed higher HER activity with overpotentials of 131.6–193.8 mV for x = 0.02–0.84 in comparison to Ni 5 P 4 NCs (218.1 mV) at a current density of −10 mA/cm 2 . Alloying with Zn increases the material’s stability with only a ∼10% increase in overpotential for Ni 4.49 Zn 0.51 P 4 NCs at −50 mA/cm 2, whereas a ∼33% increase was observed for Ni 5 P 4 NCs. At current densities above −40 mA/cm 2, bimetallic NCs with x = 0.10, 0.29, and 0.51 compositions outperformed the benchmark Pt/C catalyst, suggesting that hexagonal alloyed Ni 5– x Zn x P 4 NCs are excellent candidates for practical applications that necessitate lower HER overpotentials at higher current densities.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284-2006, United States
Funding
Division of Chemistry · Virginia Commonwealth University
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/er.137210.1002/er.1372 ↗
2. 10.1002/aenm.20190312010.1002/aenm.201903120 ↗
3. Lasia A. · 2003 · 416
4. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0071710.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00717 ↗
5. Xiaohui J. · Petrochem. Technol. · 2015 · 44 · 1409
6. 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.09.01910.1016/j.cattod.2008.09.019 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.05.02610.1016/j.apcata.2014.05.026 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.10.03210.1016/j.cattod.2019.10.032 ↗
9. 10.1134/s096554412010004710.1134/s0965544120100047 ↗
10. 10.1039/d0ta05797e10.1039/d0ta05797e ↗
11. Khalafallah D. · 2022 · 525
12. 10.1039/c4ta04867a10.1039/c4ta04867a ↗
13. 10.1016/j.nantod.2017.06.00610.1016/j.nantod.2017.06.006 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0446610.1021/acscatal.7b04466 ↗
15. 10.1039/c4ee02940b10.1039/c4ee02940b ↗
16. 10.1002/chem.20180196410.1002/chem.201801964 ↗
17. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0276110.1021/acscatal.7b02761 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.14987210.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149872 ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20180169010.1002/aenm.201801690 ↗
20. 10.3389/fchem.2019.0044410.3389/fchem.2019.00444 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20190697210.1002/adma.201906972 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0143710.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01437 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.0c0820210.1021/acsami.0c08202 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cplett.2011.07.05510.1016/j.cplett.2011.07.055 ↗
25. 10.1002/chem.20170532210.1002/chem.201705322 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0044110.1021/acsanm.9b00441 ↗
27. 10.1002/admi.20220073910.1002/admi.202200739 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.catcom.2020.10595710.1016/j.catcom.2020.105957 ↗
29. 10.3390/catal1209105510.3390/catal12091055 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b0112510.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01125 ↗
31. 10.1002/adpr.20220002610.1002/adpr.202200026 ↗
32. 10.1103/physrevb.54.1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
33. 10.1039/c8ta00437d10.1039/c8ta00437d ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14374110.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143741 ↗
35. 10.1149/1.185698810.1149/1.1856988 ↗
36. 10.1039/c5cp01065a10.1039/c5cp01065a ↗
37. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0121110.1021/acscatal.6b01211 ↗
38. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0226410.1021/acscatal.9b02264 ↗
39. 10.1021/ja054001910.1021/ja0540019 ↗
40. 10.1038/nmat175210.1038/nmat1752 ↗
41. 10.1038/ncomms478310.1038/ncomms4783 ↗
42. 10.1039/c8cp00927a10.1039/c8cp00927a ↗
43. 10.1039/c8cp06143b10.1039/c8cp06143b ↗
44. 10.1039/d1cp00684c10.1039/d1cp00684c ↗
45. 10.1103/physrevlett.77.386510.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
47. 10.1002/jcc.2175910.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
48. 10.1021/jacs.8b0094710.1021/jacs.8b00947 ↗
49. 10.1021/cm901073k10.1021/cm901073k ↗
50. 10.1021/acsami.9b1771410.1021/acsami.9b17714 ↗
51. Hosnay Mobarok M. · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 1952
52. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0174710.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01747 ↗
53. 10.1002/cctc.20160152610.1002/cctc.201601526 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0162410.1021/acsanm.0c01624 ↗
55. 10.1002/adfm.20220077110.1002/adfm.202200771 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0024810.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00248 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0038210.1021/acsenergylett.9b00382 ↗
58. 10.1021/cs300691m10.1021/cs300691m ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0095810.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00958 ↗