journal article·2022-11-08

Achieving Desired Lithium Concentration in Garnet Solid Electrolytes; Processing Impacts on Physical and Electrochemical Properties

Matthew A. Limpert, Terrill B. Atwater, Tanner Hamann, Griffin Luh Godbey, Gregory T. Hitz, Dennis Wayne McOwen, Eric D. Wachsman

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 34· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

Lithium-ion-conducting garnets are one of the most promising solid-state electrolytes to replace liquid organic electrolytes in lithium batteries, resulting in a tremendous and rapidly increasing number of garnet publications and commercial activity. However, these publications are typically based on a nominal lithium content with the addition of excess lithium to qualitatively supplement lithium losses during calcining and sintering, resulting in an inexact lithium composition that directly influences the sintered garnet’s physical and electrochemical properties. In this study, we systematically varied the lithium content during the processing of Li6.75±XLa2.75Ca0.25Zr1.75Nb0.5O12 (LLCZN), then measured the actual lithium content, and determined density, secondary phase formation, and the impact on electrochemical properties. The molar lithium content after sintering ranged from 5.5 to 7.3 lithium per mol for a desired 6.75 stoichiometric LLCZN Li-composition, depending on the starting lithium content and sintering conditions utilized. Secondary phases were detected when lithium content was outside of the designed stoichiometry, hindering sintering. Samples sintered in MgO crucibles obtained high bulk conductivities (>10–4 S cm–1). However, they exhibited low grain boundary conductance due to secondary phases, resulting in total conductivities on the order of 10–5 S cm–1. In comparison, when sintered in Al2O3 crucibles, bulk conductivity (2.0 × 10–4 S cm–1) and grain boundary conductance (1.07 × 10–3 S cm–1) reached their maximum at 6.37 lithium per mol of LLCZN for a total conductivity of 1.68 × 10–4 S cm–1. While similar bulk conductivities were attained when sintered in MgO crucibles, the highest total conductivities were achieved in samples contaminated with parts per million levels of aluminum from the Al2O3 crucible.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Tactical Power Branch, Power Division, C5ISR Center, Research & Technology Integration Directorate, DEVCOM, APG, Maryland21005, United States

Maryland Energy Innovation Institute, and Department of Material Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland20742, United States

Funding

Army Research Laboratory

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Shionuma K. · 1991 · 1 · 33
2. 10.1016/0038-1098(93)90841-A10.1016/0038-1098(93)90841-A ↗
3. 10.1007/s11581-016-1744-810.1007/s11581-016-1744-8 ↗
4. 10.1006/jssc.1993.131710.1006/jssc.1993.1317 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.208659710.1149/1.2086597 ↗
6. 10.1021/cm010528i10.1021/cm010528i ↗
7. 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00277-010.1016/S0167-2738(00)00277-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.04.08410.1016/j.jallcom.2010.04.084 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20040004410.1002/adfm.200400044 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.08910.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.089 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20070114410.1002/anie.200701144 ↗
12. 10.1021/cm201671k10.1021/cm201671k ↗
13. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.02.03510.1016/j.elecom.2011.02.035 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.5b1218610.1021/acsami.5b12186 ↗
15. 10.1149/2.0321509jes10.1149/2.0321509jes ↗
16. 10.1149/1.222072310.1149/1.2220723 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.065 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.05.065 ↗
19. 10.1016/B978-0-444-88508-1.50139-010.1016/B978-0-444-88508-1.50139-0 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11664-016-4924-410.1007/s11664-016-4924-4 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02753.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02753.x ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-3115(78)90460-910.1016/0022-3115(78)90460-9 ↗
23. 10.1039/A908609110.1039/A9086091 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.14010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.140 ↗
25. 10.1111/jace.1717710.1111/jace.17177 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1303056010.3390/ma13030560 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mseb.2009.12.00710.1016/j.mseb.2009.12.007 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10854-018-8559-510.1007/s10854-018-8559-5 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.04610.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.046 ↗
30. 10.1039/c3ta11996c10.1039/c3ta11996c ↗
31. 10.1039/C3TA11338H10.1039/C3TA11338H ↗
32. 10.1107/S056773947600155110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.06710.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.067 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.01.01310.1016/j.jechem.2019.01.013 ↗
35. 10.1007/s00339-008-4494-210.1007/s00339-008-4494-2 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.0c1867410.1021/acsami.0c18674 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ssi.2016.06.01310.1016/j.ssi.2016.06.013 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00274-610.1016/S0167-2738(02)00274-6 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.1990002030410.1002/adma.19900020304 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.0c0860510.1021/acsami.0c08605 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.09710.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.097 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.29510.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.295 ↗
43. 10.1039/B907331K10.1039/B907331K ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.04.02710.1016/j.ensm.2022.04.027 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13606010.1016/j.electacta.2020.136060 ↗
46. 10.1039/C7DT01573A10.1039/C7DT01573A ↗
47. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13928510.1016/j.electacta.2021.139285 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0097610.1021/acsaem.8b00976 ↗