journal article·2024-04-09Open access

Polymer-Derived Silicon Oxycarbide/Graphene Oxide Porous Ceramic Monoliths Obtained from Pickering Emulsions: Application as Active Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Bonito A. Karamoko, Sonjoy Dey, Shakir B. Mujib, Jiefeng Liu, Wensen Wang, Ji Li, Gurpreet Singh, Damien Voiry, Chrystelle Salameh, Benjamin K. Yao, Philippe Miele

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 36· Issue 7

Abstract

The fabrication of porous ceramic materials is of great importance for various applications in energy, catalysis, filtration, and refractory applications. Achieving rational design of polymer-derived ceramics (PDC) with hierarchical porosity has been made possible with the use of porous agents, direct foaming, or replicates. However, these synthetic approaches often suffer from complexity and limited control over their desired porous architectures. In this study, we report an innovative method for preparing porous polymer-derived ceramic (PDC) monoliths by combining the preceramic polymer route and the Pickering emulsion method. The emulsions were prepared by using a SiOC precursor and stabilized with graphene oxide nanosheets modified with hexadecylamine. The effects of formulation on the final properties of Pickering emulsions were thoroughly studied, taking into account the emulsification process, emulsification rate, concentration of modified graphene oxide (GO), and DMSO/cyclohexane ratio. As a proof of concept, we have used the monoliths obtained as electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage in Li-ion batteries (LIBs), exhibiting higher specific capacities that are approximately 2 times higher than that of the graphite anode. Among the tested electrodes, the SiOC-GO-R16 (23%, 900 °C) electrode showed the best overall performance, displaying impressive insertion and extraction capacities of approximately 2399 and 1176 mAh g –1 at 50 mA g –1, respectively, in the first cycle. At 800 mA g –1, the charge capacity was 350 mAh g –1 after 175 consecutive cycles, accompanied by a Coulombic efficiency of 88%. Our approach offers a novel and efficient route to fabricate porous PDC monoliths with tailored properties and superior electrochemical performance compared to traditional PDC-based electrodes in LIBs and highlights their potential for advanced energy storage applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut Européen des Membranes (IEM), UMR 5635, Univ Montpellier, ENSCM, CNRS, Montpellier 34095, France

Laboratory of Synthesis, Industrial Processes, Environment, and Renewable Energies, Félix Houphouët-Boigny National Polytechnic Institute of Yamoussoukro, P.O. Box 1093, Yamoussoukro, Ivory Coast

Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, United States

College of Bioresources and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710021, Shaanxi, China

Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), MESR, Paris 75231, France

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Institut Europ?en des Membranes, Universit? de Montpellier · Institut Universitaire de France · Office of International Science and Engineering · Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Republic of C?te d'Ivoire

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mser.2016.05.00110.1016/j.mser.2016.05.001 ↗
2. 10.1088/1468-6996/11/4/04430310.1088/1468-6996/11/4/044303 ↗
3. 10.1039/CT907910200110.1039/CT9079102001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.crhy.2014.09.01010.1016/j.crhy.2014.09.010 ↗
5. 10.1021/am402054910.1021/am4020549 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.8b0449710.1021/acsami.8b04497 ↗
7. 10.1039/C5RA05901A10.1039/C5RA05901A ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.18610.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.186 ↗
9. 10.1021/cm401605a10.1021/cm401605a ↗
10. 10.1039/C3NJ01612A10.1039/C3NJ01612A ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.10048210.1016/j.apmt.2019.100482 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.19410.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.194 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.04.00410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.04.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.12.02010.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.12.020 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.08710.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.087 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.02.03310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.02.033 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.02.01210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.02.012 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20140057810.1002/adma.201400578 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.08810.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.088 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.03.01010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.03.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13789910.1016/j.electacta.2021.137899 ↗
22. 10.1038/ncomms1099810.1038/ncomms10998 ↗
23. 10.1039/C8TA01570H10.1039/C8TA01570H ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.10.02610.1016/j.carbon.2021.10.026 ↗
25. 10.1021/la401150t10.1021/la401150t ↗
26. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b0064810.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00648 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.12395210.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123952 ↗
28. 10.3390/nano809071610.3390/nano8090716 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0324410.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03244 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b0064810.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00648 ↗
31. 10.1021/la402436w10.1021/la402436w ↗
32. 10.1021/nn100636810.1021/nn1006368 ↗
33. 10.3390/nano1203055310.3390/nano12030553 ↗
34. 10.1149/1.222072910.1149/1.2220729 ↗
35. 10.3390/s2119657810.3390/s21196578 ↗
36. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-26510.1186/1556-276X-9-265 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.02.05410.1016/j.jcis.2013.02.054 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20090206910.1002/adma.200902069 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41563-019-0464-710.1038/s41563-019-0464-7 ↗
40. 10.1039/C7PY01819C10.1039/C7PY01819C ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.12090210.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120902 ↗
42. 10.1021/am400582n10.1021/am400582n ↗
43. 10.1002/adfm.20110256410.1002/adfm.201102564 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.19810.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.198 ↗
45. 10.1002/adem.20190103610.1002/adem.201901036 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.10.03710.1016/j.micromeso.2011.10.037 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsami.0c1237610.1021/acsami.0c12376 ↗
48. 10.1515/pac-2014-111710.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
49. 10.1002/aenm.20120032010.1002/aenm.201200320 ↗
50. 10.1039/C7RA08442K10.1039/C7RA08442K ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.07210.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.072 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.01010.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.010 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.12.03010.1016/j.ssi.2013.12.030 ↗
54. Messing, M.; Shoa, T.; Habibi, S. In EIS from Accelerated and Realistic Battery Aging, IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC), Chicago, IL, 2021.10.1109/ITEC51675.2021.9490091 ↗
55. Pastor-Fernandez, C.; Widanage, W. D.; Marco, J.; Gama-Valdez, M. A.; Chouchelamane, G. H. In Identification and Quantification of Ageing Mechanisms in Lithium-Ion Batteries Using the EIS Technique, IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), Dearborn, MI, 2016.10.1109/ITEC.2016.7520198 ↗
56. 10.3390/batteries911053410.3390/batteries9110534 ↗