Selective Uptake of Ethane/Ethylene Mixtures by UTSA-280 is Driven by Reversibly Coordinated Water Defects
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The metal–organic framework (MOF) UTSA-280 has been shown previously to separate ethane/ethylene mixtures. We show that this separation is kinetic; if full equilibrium is reached, the MOF is not selective. The time scales associated with this kinetic separation are sufficient to make the material potentially interesting for practical separations. The observation of kinetic separation is surprising because the MOF’s one-dimensional (1D) channels are small enough that molecular motion along the channels would be expected to take place by single-file diffusion, which is not observed. We show using a combination of experimental and modeling techniques that diffusion of molecules between adjacent 1D channels through local defects associated with coordinated water molecules allows net mixing of molecules and, moreover, that this process is potentially responsible for the selective nature of the observed kinetic separation. We show how activation and regeneration conditions play an essential role in controlling the density of these local defects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100, United States
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 38730, United States
Funding
Dow Chemical Company
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/532435a10.1038/532435a ↗
2. 10.1038/s41563-018-0206-210.1038/s41563-018-0206-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/0025-5408(87)90055-910.1016/0025-5408(87)90055-9 ↗
4. 10.1021/ja406730t10.1021/ja406730t ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.03410.1016/j.cej.2018.10.034 ↗
6. 10.1002/aic.1768810.1002/aic.17688 ↗
7. 10.6023/A2004013010.6023/A20040130 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.287.5453.62510.1126/science.287.5453.625 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.276210.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2762 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0009-2614(95)01246-X10.1016/S0009-2614(95)01246-X ↗
11. 10.1016/0021-9517(92)90062-M10.1016/0021-9517(92)90062-M ↗
12. 10.1080/0026897960010024110.1080/00268979600100241 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.06590110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.065901 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.07450110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.074501 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0417510.1021/acs.jpcc.2c04175 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0113510.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01135 ↗
17. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.132322410.1063/1.1323224 ↗
20. 10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
21. 10.1021/j100389a01010.1021/j100389a010 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp972543+10.1021/jp972543+ ↗
23. 10.1021/jp001044x10.1021/jp001044x ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0428710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04287 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jced.0c0059810.1021/acs.jced.0c00598 ↗