Importance of Structural Features and the Influence of Individual Structures of Graphene Oxide Using Shapley Value Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
The application of machine learning (ML) to materials chemistry can accelerate the design process, and when coupled with a detailed explanation, can guide future research. Shapley value analysis is a complementary approach capable of providing a comprehensive analysis of the underlying reasons behind a structure/property relationship. In this study, we have used data sets of graphene oxide nanomaterials generated using electronic structure simulations to train ML models with outstanding accuracy, generalizability, and stability to predict the formation energy and the Fermi energy and applied Shapley value analysis to understand the results. Feature important profiles that rank the value of structural characteristics to each property confirmed that the underlying structure/property relationships are relatively simple and scientifically intuitive, even though the ML models need complex information to achieve high performance. We have also reported instance influence profiles that rank the value of each individual graphene oxide structure to the training process. Feature/instance interactions are also investigated to explain which structural characteristics make particular structures influential, revealing that the most influential structures typically have very high or very low concentrations of H or O. Since the range of concentrations is typically chosen by researchers based on domain knowledge at the outset, this highlights that extreme care should be taken when gathering training data as these decisions will have a very big impact on the final model once trained. In general, the reproducible workflow demonstrated here can be applied to any similar materials data set to make reliable model-agnostic predictions of how the structural characteristics and individual structures contribute to the prediction of functional properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Advanced Graph Neural Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computing, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c0cs00163e10.1039/c0cs00163e ↗
2. 10.1073/pnas.151624711210.1073/pnas.1516247112 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41578-018-0005-z10.1038/s41578-018-0005-z ↗
4. 10.1038/s41578-019-0101-810.1038/s41578-019-0101-8 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41524-021-00495-810.1038/s41524-021-00495-8 ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-02113210.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-021132 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41524-017-0056-510.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41524-019-0221-010.1038/s41524-019-0221-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10919410.1016/j.matdes.2020.109194 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0135710.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01357 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41598-022-14394-510.1038/s41598-022-14394-5 ↗
12. 10.1557/mrs.2018.20610.1557/mrs.2018.206 ↗
13. 10.1039/c9nr05912a10.1039/c9nr05912a ↗
14. Tanaka I. · 2020
15. 10.3390/cancers1310248110.3390/cancers13102481 ↗
16. 10.1088/1755-1315/655/1/01201810.1088/1755-1315/655/1/012018 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.277.5330.123710.1126/science.277.5330.1237 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.288.5468.99310.1126/science.288.5468.993 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-021-83193-110.1038/s41598-021-83193-1 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-022-19426-810.1038/s41598-022-19426-8 ↗
21. 10.1109/access.2020.297619910.1109/access.2020.2976199 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.00710.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 ↗
23. 10.1109/mic.2020.303176910.1109/mic.2020.3031769 ↗
24. Shapley L. S. · 1952
25. 10.1088/2632-2153/ac016710.1088/2632-2153/ac0167 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10069610.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100696 ↗
27. Liu T. · ArXiv · 2023
28. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.03410.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20100106810.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
30. 10.1021/cr300115g10.1021/cr300115g ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.11.01010.1016/j.apmt.2017.11.010 ↗
32. 10.1002/anie.20100389710.1002/anie.201003897 ↗
33. 10.1021/am301372d10.1021/am301372d ↗
34. 10.1021/ar300118v10.1021/ar300118v ↗
35. 10.3390/nano1105108310.3390/nano11051083 ↗
36. 10.3390/ijms23181071210.3390/ijms231810712 ↗
37. 10.1088/2053-1583/ac635d10.1088/2053-1583/ac635d ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0278010.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02780 ↗
39. 10.1039/d1ta10588d10.1039/d1ta10588d ↗
40. Barnard A. · 2019
41. Barnard A. · 2019
42. Barnard A. · 2019
43. Barnard A. · 2019
44. 10.1088/2399-1984/ab58ac10.1088/2399-1984/ab58ac ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b1061510.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10615 ↗
46. 10.1002/adts.20220001310.1002/adts.202200013 ↗
47. Sundararajan M. · arXiv · 2019
48. Ribeiro, M. T.; Singh, S.; Guestrin, C. ”Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, August 13-17, 2016; pp 1135–1144.10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗
49. Ho, T. K. Random decision forests. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. 1995; pp 278–282.
50. 10.1214/aos/101320345110.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
51. Covert, I.; Lee, S.I. Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation Using Linear Regression. Proceedings of The 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 2021; pp 3457–3465.
52. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
53. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11152610.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111526 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0578810.1021/acsnano.5b05788 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.coche.2022.10081810.1016/j.coche.2022.100818 ↗
56. 10.1002/adts.20210041410.1002/adts.202100414 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c0020010.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00200 ↗