Revealing Hidden Patterns through Chemical Intuition and Interpretable Machine Learning: A Case Study of Binary Rare-Earth Intermetallics RX
Source abstract
Abstract
Machine learning algorithms have been applied successfully in many areas of materials chemistry but often suffer from an inability to extract chemical insight. To demonstrate that an approach combining machine learning and chemical intuition can be effective in generating interpretable models, the structures of binary equiatomic rare-earth intermetallics RX, whose relationships have long defied understanding, were investigated as a case study. A structure map was developed based on only two parameters, which are derived from simple elemental descriptors (atomic number, period and group numbers, radii, and electronegativity) of the R and X components. This map reveals the previously hidden patterns of structural regularities of RX intermetallics. It explains the preference for CsCl-, TlI-, or FeB-type structures among these compounds, predicts the structures of missing members, rationalizes the occurrence of metastable phases and polymorphic transformations, and offers strategies for structure stabilization through the addition of a third component.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AlbertaT6G 2G2, Canada
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Manhattan College, Riverdale, New York10471, United States
Funding
Canada First Research Excellence Fund · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b0049010.1021/acs.accounts.7b00490 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41586-018-0337-210.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-6463/aad92610.1088/1361-6463/aad926 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20190324210.1002/aenm.201903242 ↗
5. 10.1002/chem.20200074210.1002/chem.202000742 ↗
6. Ribeiro, M. T.; Singh, S.; Guestrin, C.Why should I trust you? Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. arXiv preprint 2016, arXiv:1602.04938v3 [cs.LG].10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗
7. 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20191028310.1002/anie.201910283 ↗
9. Oviedo, F.; Ferres, J. L.; Buonassisi, T.; Butler, K. T.Interpretable and Explainable Machine Learning for Materials Science and Chemistry. arXiv preprint 2021, arXiv:2111.01037v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci].
10. 10.1214/21-ss13310.1214/21-ss133 ↗
11. Pauling, L. The Nature of the Chemical Bond, 3rd ed. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, 1960; pp 505–562.
12. 10.1002/anie.20200082910.1002/anie.202000829 ↗
13. 10.1007/bf0150752710.1007/bf01507527 ↗
14. 10.1126/sciadv.aav069310.1126/sciadv.aav0693 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2011.02.00110.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2011.02.001 ↗
16. Villars P. · 2021
17. Bergerhoff G. · 1987
18. 10.1107/s205252061600395410.1107/s2052520616003954 ↗
19. 10.1017/s088571561900081210.1017/s0885715619000812 ↗
20. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.443-444.35710.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.443-444.357 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11837-013-0755-410.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.00210.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.002 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.07.01610.1016/j.commatsci.2008.07.016 ↗
25. 10.1109/mcse.2012.1610.1109/mcse.2012.16 ↗
26. Pőhls J.-H. · J. Solid State Chem. · 2020 · 290 · 12155710.1016/j.jssc.2020.121557 ↗
27. 10.1063/5.004945310.1063/5.0049453 ↗
28. 10.1016/0038-1098(84)90765-810.1016/0038-1098(84)90765-8 ↗
29. 10.1103/physrevlett.53.108010.1103/physrevlett.53.1080 ↗
30. 10.1088/0022-3719/19/3/00210.1088/0022-3719/19/3/002 ↗
31. 10.1088/0022-3719/19/3/00310.1088/0022-3719/19/3/003 ↗
32. 10.1103/physrevb.22.583910.1103/physrevb.22.5839 ↗
33. Sproud G. D. · ACS Omega · 2020 · 5 · 1158510.1021/acsomega.0c00831 ↗
34. Dschemuchadse J. · Inorg. Chem. · 2015 · 54 · 112010.1021/ic5024482 ↗
35. Dschemuchadse J. · Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A · 2015 · 71 · 33510.1107/S2053273315004064 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0246210.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02462 ↗
37. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-090319-01095410.1146/annurev-matsci-090319-010954 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10949810.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109498 ↗
39. 10.1016/0022-5088(83)90489-710.1016/0022-5088(83)90489-7 ↗
40. 10.1103/physrevb.85.10410410.1103/physrevb.85.104104 ↗
41. 10.1103/physrevb.91.21430210.1103/physrevb.91.214302 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0290510.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02905 ↗
43. 10.1002/adma.20100218010.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11775910.1016/j.actamat.2022.117759 ↗
45. 10.1021/ic00247a00710.1021/ic00247a007 ↗
46. 10.1088/0953-8984/28/22/22300110.1088/0953-8984/28/22/223001 ↗
47. Buschow K. H. J. · Philips Res. Rep. · 1967 · 22 · 233
48. “We should totally buy a bar.” “Our bar would be awesome.” “And dude, dude, dude, DUDE . the name of our bar . Puzzles. People will be, like, ‘Why is it called Puzzles?’ That’s the puzzle!” in How I Met Your Mother, Season 4, Episode13, 2009.
49. Gladyshevskii E. I. · Zh. Strukt. Khim. · 1964 · 5 · 853
50. 10.1107/s0365110x6500313410.1107/s0365110x65003134 ↗
51. 10.1107/s0365110x6600128210.1107/s0365110x66001282 ↗
52. 10.1021/ic50063a02610.1021/ic50063a026 ↗
53. 10.1016/0040-6031(75)85039-810.1016/0040-6031(75)85039-8 ↗
54. 10.1016/0022-5088(70)90044-510.1016/0022-5088(70)90044-5 ↗
55. 10.1103/physrevmaterials.2.08380210.1103/physrevmaterials.2.083802 ↗
56. 10.1016/0022-5088(82)90069-810.1016/0022-5088(82)90069-8 ↗
57. 10.1016/0022-4596(80)90021-310.1016/0022-4596(80)90021-3 ↗
58. Pospíšil J. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2008 · 450 · 11810.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.005 ↗
59. 10.1103/physrevb.78.18443610.1103/physrevb.78.184436 ↗
60. 10.1107/s0365110x6500205010.1107/s0365110x65002050 ↗
61. 10.1107/s0365110x6100275810.1107/s0365110x61002758 ↗
62. Zhuang Y. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2002 · 346 · 18110.1016/S0925-8388(02)00505-4 ↗
63. 10.1143/jpsj.36.170910.1143/jpsj.36.1709 ↗
64. 10.1016/0022-5088(73)90058-110.1016/0022-5088(73)90058-1 ↗
65. 10.1016/0304-8853(88)90078-910.1016/0304-8853(88)90078-9 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.18310.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.183 ↗
67. Dürr I. · Z. Naturforsch. B · 2011 · 66 · 1107
68. 10.1016/s0966-9795(03)00164-x10.1016/s0966-9795(03)00164-x ↗
69. 10.1016/j.calphad.2008.07.01710.1016/j.calphad.2008.07.017 ↗
70. Nevitt M. V. · 1963 · 101
71. Iandelli A. · Rev. Chim. Miner. · 1976 · 13 · 55
72. 10.1002/(sici)1521-3749(199907)625:7<1151::aid-zaac1151>3.0.co;2-410.1002/(sici)1521-3749(199907)625:7<1151::aid-zaac1151>3.0.co;2-4 ↗
73. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.1010.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
74. Tolba S. A. · 2018
75. 10.1002/qua.2452110.1002/qua.24521 ↗
76. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
77. 10.1023/a:101093340432410.1023/a:1010933404324 ↗
78. Box, G. E. P.; Draper, N. R. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces; Wiley: New York, 1987, p 424.
79. 10.1154/1.213531510.1154/1.2135315 ↗
80. Rodríguez-Carvajal J. · Commission on Powder Diffraction (IUCr) Newsletter · 2001 · 26 · 12
81. 10.1107/s002188981103897010.1107/s0021889811038970 ↗