journal article·2022-02-08

Contrasting Catalytic Functions of Metal Vanadates and Their Oxide Composite Analogues for NH3-Assisted, Selective NOX Transformation

Seokhyun Lee, Jung-Hyun Lee, Heon Phil Ha, Jongsik Kim

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 34· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

V2O5 fuses with transition metals to create dozens of different metal vanadates, whose acidic/redox traits can be diverse yet optimized for selective catalytic NOX reduction (SCR) by changing the metals used or their metal:vanadium stoichiometry. However, no metal vanadate has been compared with its metal oxide composite analogue as an active phase for SCR, albeit a vanadate occasionally outperforms an oxide composite simulating a commercial catalyst (V2O5–WO3). Herein, Cu3V2O8 and CuO–VO2/V2O5 were rationally selected as model phases of metal vanadates and oxide composites and isolated using pH regulation of their synthetic mixture to ≤∼5 (pH1/pH5) and ∼11 (pH11), respectively. The pH1/pH5/pH11 samples were comparable with regard to morphological, textural, and compositional traits but not for crystallographic features. This thus provided the impetus to simulate the pH1/pH5/pH11 surfaces under a SO2-containing feed-gas stream, by which SOA2–/HSOA– functionalities (A = 3–4) were anchored on their (defective) Lewis acidic metals and/or labile oxygens (Oα). This could result in the formation of pH1-S/pH5-S/pH11-S, whose major surface species were Brönsted acidic bonds (SOA2–/HSOA–) and redox sites (Oα; mobile oxygen (OM); oxygen vacancy (OV)). pH1-S/pH5-S/pH11-S were similar in terms of NH3 binding energies and energy barriers in SCR yet escalated collision frequencies among the surface species involved in the sequence of pH11-S < pH5-S < pH1-S (via kinetic assessments), as was the case with the numbers of SOA2–/HSOA– functionalities of the catalysts (via temperature-resolved Raman spectroscopy). These were coupled to elevate the efficiency of acidic cycling on the order of pH11-S < pH5-S < pH1-S. Meanwhile, the amounts of Oα and OV (or OM) innate to pH1-S/pH5-S were smaller than and comparable to those of pH11-S, respectively. Nonetheless, pH1-S/pH5-S provided greater OM mobility than pH11-S, thereby proceeding better with redox cycling than pH11-S (via 18O-labeling O2-on/off runs). Furthermore, pH1-S/pH5-S outperformed pH11-S in SCR under diffusion-limited domains, while enhancing the resistance to H2O, ammonium (bi)sulfate poisons, or hydro-thermal aging over pH11-S by diversifying the selective N2 production pathway other than SCR.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Extreme Materials Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 02792, South Korea

Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 02841, South Korea

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea · National Research Foundation of Korea · Korea Institute of Science and Technology

References (82)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jacs.8b1024610.1021/jacs.8b10246 ↗
2. 10.1021/ed800128610.1021/ed8001286 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0290810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02908 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0607910.1021/acs.est.6b06079 ↗
5. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0370410.1021/acscatal.0c03704 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.06910.1016/j.cej.2017.08.069 ↗
7. 10.1006/jcat.1999.252410.1006/jcat.1999.2524 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00214-017-2130-y10.1007/s00214-017-2130-y ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12578010.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125780 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-021-22429-010.1038/s41467-021-22429-0 ↗
11. 10.1039/D0TA12399D10.1039/D0TA12399D ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20120061510.1002/adfm.201200615 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.02310.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.023 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0121710.1021/acs.est.9b01217 ↗
15. 10.1039/C4CY01599A10.1039/C4CY01599A ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.02010.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.020 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.02.01510.1016/j.apcata.2004.02.015 ↗
18. 10.1070/RC1976v045n12ABEH00276510.1070/RC1976v045n12ABEH002765 ↗
19. 10.1006/jcat.2002.354510.1006/jcat.2002.3545 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.10.05710.1016/j.apcata.2013.10.057 ↗
21. 10.1021/ie970934510.1021/ie9709345 ↗
22. 10.1039/C8CY01304G10.1039/C8CY01304G ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.05.03010.1016/j.cattod.2019.05.030 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14623810.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146238 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.02410.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.024 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apcata.2018.11.02410.1016/j.apcata.2018.11.024 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp907783g10.1021/jp907783g ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.12038810.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120388 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0527110.1021/acs.iecr.9b05271 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12267110.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122671 ↗
31. 10.1021/cs300480c10.1021/cs300480c ↗
32. 10.1002/chem.20140651610.1002/chem.201406516 ↗
33. 10.1021/jacs.8b0099510.1021/jacs.8b00995 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12796510.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127965 ↗
35. 10.1021/jacsau.1c0012410.1021/jacsau.1c00124 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-019-11848-910.1038/s41467-019-11848-9 ↗
37. 10.1021/ie990695g10.1021/ie990695g ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apcata.2020.11783010.1016/j.apcata.2020.117830 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12445810.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124458 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20190592310.1002/adma.201905923 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.01510.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.015 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0235610.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02356 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0134910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01349 ↗
44. 10.1139/v72-62510.1139/v72-625 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.02110.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.021 ↗
46. 10.1021/jacs.8b0899810.1021/jacs.8b08998 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0080710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00807 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0415510.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04155 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.12511610.1103/PhysRevB.91.125116 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0100610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01006 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.1006010.1103/PhysRevB.42.10060 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0000410.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00004 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0280610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02806 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.01.04410.1016/j.apcatb.2011.01.044 ↗
55. 10.1039/c2ce06347f10.1039/c2ce06347f ↗
56. 10.1002/jrs.561610.1002/jrs.5616 ↗
57. 10.1002/jrs.208910.1002/jrs.2089 ↗
58. 10.1039/C5CC10476A10.1039/C5CC10476A ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.16610.1016/j.cej.2019.01.166 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.04310.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.043 ↗
61. 10.1021/acscatal.8b0019610.1021/acscatal.8b00196 ↗
62. 10.1364/AO.44.00691310.1364/AO.44.006913 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.12.01910.1016/j.apcatb.2011.12.019 ↗
64. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0322310.1021/acscatal.6b03223 ↗
65. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0315410.1021/acscatal.0c03154 ↗
66. 10.1021/acs.est.9b0066510.1021/acs.est.9b00665 ↗
67. 10.4172/2153-2435.100048110.4172/2153-2435.1000481 ↗
68. 10.1002/adfm.20130211710.1002/adfm.201302117 ↗
69. 10.1021/cm401052w10.1021/cm401052w ↗
70. 10.1021/acsami.9b0245510.1021/acsami.9b02455 ↗
71. 10.1039/C7CY01029J10.1039/C7CY01029J ↗
72. 10.1002/smll.20210240810.1002/smll.202102408 ↗
73. 10.1021/es102692b10.1021/es102692b ↗
74. 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.02.00210.1016/j.cattod.2010.02.002 ↗
75. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0029610.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00296 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.02410.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.024 ↗
77. 10.1021/ef502034610.1021/ef5020346 ↗
78. 10.1002/cphc.20170133310.1002/cphc.201701333 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.01110.1016/j.cej.2017.10.011 ↗
80. 10.1021/ie000551y10.1021/ie000551y ↗
81. 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.06.05210.1016/j.cattod.2019.06.052 ↗
82. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0515110.1021/acscatal.9b05151 ↗