Enhancing Gas Separation Selectivity Prediction through Geometrical and Chemical Descriptors
Source abstract
Abstract
Adsorption-based techniques for gas separation using nanoporous materials are widely used and hold a promising future, but systematic identification of the best-performing materials for a given application is still an open problem. For that task, we need to estimate selectivity at different operating conditions (temperature and pressure) on a large set of nanoporous structures. To this aim, we have developed a machine-learning-assisted screening process based on a fast grid calculation of interaction energies, in addition to newly designed geometrical descriptors to predict ambient-pressure selectivity. As a proof of concept, we tested our methodology for the separation of a 20:80 xenon/krypton mixture at 298 K and 1 atm in the nanoporous materials of the CoRE MOF 2019 database. Based on a train/test split of the data set, our model is promising with an RMSE of 2.5 on the ambient-pressure selectivity values of the test set and 0.06 on the log 10 of the selectivity. This method can thence be used to preselect the best performing materials for a more thorough investigation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CEA, DES, ISEC, DMRC, Univ. Montpellier, Marcoule, 30207 Bagnols-sur-Cèze, 34090 Montpellier, France
Chimie ParisTech PSL University, CNRS Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris, 75005 Paris, France
Funding
Orano
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Kerry, F. G. Industrial Gas Handbook: Gas Separation and Purification ; CRC Press: 2007; pp 129–168.10.1201/9781420008265 ↗
2. National Academies of Sciences. Engineering, and Medicine A Research Agenda for Transforming Separation Science ; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2019; pp 7–14.
3. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.02510.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.025 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat403510.1038/nmat4035 ↗
5. 10.1021/jacs.9b0342210.1021/jacs.9b03422 ↗
6. 10.1021/jacs.1c1287310.1021/jacs.1c12873 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.08.00810.1016/j.chempr.2020.08.008 ↗
8. 10.1021/acscentsci.2c0117710.1021/acscentsci.2c01177 ↗
9. 10.1107/S205252061600395410.1107/S2052520616003954 ↗
10. 10.1038/nchem.119210.1038/nchem.1192 ↗
11. 10.1039/C6CE00407E10.1039/C6CE00407E ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0084810.1021/acs.cgd.7b00848 ↗
13. 10.1039/D2DD00018K10.1039/D2DD00018K ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0147510.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01475 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.321572210.1063/1.3215722 ↗
16. 10.1039/D2SC05810C10.1039/D2SC05810C ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c0079810.1021/acs.jctc.2c00798 ↗
18. 10.1039/D1FD00024A10.1039/D1FD00024A ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jced.9b0083510.1021/acs.jced.9b00835 ↗
20. Chen T. · 2016 · 78510.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
21. 10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
23. 10.1002/aic.1239710.1002/aic.12397 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 ↗
25. 10.1021/ic100184q10.1021/ic100184q ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b0296210.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02962 ↗
27. 10.1021/ic200345j10.1021/ic200345j ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jssc.2016.07.02610.1016/j.jssc.2016.07.026 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp400642210.1021/jp4006422 ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.9b1108410.1021/jacs.9b11084 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0074410.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00744 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0931910.1021/acs.jpcc.9b09319 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0595910.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05959 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0168210.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01682 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmgm.2013.05.00710.1016/j.jmgm.2013.05.007 ↗
36. 10.3390/math1007104210.3390/math10071042 ↗
37. 10.1177/00104140790120010110.1177/001041407901200101 ↗
38. 10.1038/163688a010.1038/163688a0 ↗
39. 10.1088/0034-4885/56/12/00110.1088/0034-4885/56/12/001 ↗
40. 10.21105/joss.0420010.21105/joss.04200 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.173411010.1063/1.1734110 ↗
42. Shapley, L. S. In Contributions to the Theory of Games (AM-28) ; Kuhn, H. W., Tucker, A. W., Eds. Princeton University Press: Princeton, 1953; Vol. II, pp 307–318.10.1515/9781400881970-018 ↗
43. Molnar, C. Interpretable machine learning; Self-published online at https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/, 2023; Chapter 9.5–9.6.
44. Lundberg, S.; Lee, S.I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. 2017; https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07874, Ver. v2 submitted on 2017-11-25 (accessed on 2023-07-05).
45. 10.1063/1.473877610.1063/1.4738776 ↗
46. 10.1021/jacs.7b0168810.1021/jacs.7b01688 ↗