journal article·2021-11-09Open access

Peculiarities of Phase Formation in Mn-Based Na SuperIonic Conductor (NaSICon) Systems: The Case of Na1+2xMnxTi2–x(PO4)3 (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.5)

Gustautas Snarskis, Jurgis Pilipavičius, Denis Gryaznov, Lina Mikoliu̅naitė, Linas Vilčiauskas

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 33· Issue 21

Abstract

NAtrium SuperIonic CONductor (NASICON) structured phosphate framework compounds are attracting a great deal of interest as suitable electrode materials for "rocking chair" type batteries. Manganese-based electrode materials are among the most favored due to their superior stability, resource non-criticality, and high electrode potentials. Although a large share of research was devoted to Mn-based oxides for Li- and Na-ion batteries, the understanding of thermodynamics and phase formation in Mn-rich polyanions is still generally lacking. In this study, we investigate a bifunctional Na-ion battery electrode system based on NASICON-structured Na1+2x Mn x Ti2-x (PO4)3 (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.5). In order to analyze the thermodynamic and phase formation properties, we construct a composition-temperature phase diagram using a computational sampling by density functional theory, cluster expansion, and semi-grand canonical Monte Carlo methods. The results indicate finite thermodynamic limits of possible Mn concentrations in this system, which are primarily determined by the phase separation into stoichiometric Na3MnTi(PO4)3 (x = 1.0) and NaTi2(PO4)3 for x < 1.0 or NaMnPO4 for x > 1.0. The theoretical predictions are corroborated by experiments obtained using X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy on solid-state and sol-gel prepared samples. The results confirm that this system does not show a solid solution type behavior but phase-separates into thermodynamically more stable sodium ordered monoclinic α-Na3MnTi(PO4)3 (space group C2) and other phases. In addition to sodium ordering, the anti-bonding character of the Mn-O bond as compared to Ti-O is suggested as another important factor governing the stability of Mn-based NASICONs. We believe that these results will not only clarify some important questions regarding the thermodynamic properties of NASICON frameworks but will also be helpful for a more general understanding of polyanionic systems.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Physical Sciences and Technology (FTMC), Saulėtekio al. 3, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania

Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia, Kengaraga 8, LV-1063 Riga, Latvia

Institute of Chemistry, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 3, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania

Funding

Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba · European Regional Development Fund

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Nelson, P. A.; Ahmed, S.; Gallagher, K. G.; Dees, D. W. Modeling the Performance and Cost of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric-Drive Vehicles, 3rd ed. Argonne National Lab. (ANL) Technical Report No. ANL/CSE-19/2150624, 2019.10.2172/1503280 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20120069110.1002/adfm.201200691 ↗
3. 10.1039/c2ee02781j10.1039/c2ee02781j ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20120002610.1002/aenm.201200026 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20170377210.1002/anie.201703772 ↗
6. 10.1126/sciadv.aba409810.1126/sciadv.aba4098 ↗
7. 10.1016/0025-5408(76)90077-510.1016/0025-5408(76)90077-5 ↗
8. 10.1021/cr300186210.1021/cr3001862 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20170043110.1002/adma.201700431 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.183786810.1149/1.1837868 ↗
11. 10.1039/d0ta10688g10.1039/d0ta10688g ↗
12. 10.1002/ange.20160650810.1002/ange.201606508 ↗
13. 10.1002/cssc.20180019410.1002/cssc.201800194 ↗
14. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0775510.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07755 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20130552210.1002/adma.201305522 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.7b1690110.1021/acsami.7b16901 ↗
17. 10.1039/b417616m10.1039/b417616m ↗
18. 10.1039/c8se00157j10.1039/c8se00157j ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0209610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02096 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.8b1138810.1021/jacs.8b11388 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20190634810.1002/adma.201906348 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20190396810.1002/aenm.201903968 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20190291810.1002/aenm.201902918 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0126910.1021/acsaem.8b01269 ↗
25. Köntje, M. Synthese und Charakterisierung von Übergangsmetallbasierten Polyanionischen Kathodenmaterialien auf Phosphatbasis. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Ulm. Fakultät für Naturwissenschaften, 2015.
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0269510.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02695 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0269510.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02695 ↗
28. Wang, Z.; Park, S.; Deng, Z.; Carlier, D.; Chotard, J.N.; Croguennec, L.; Gautam, G. S.; Cheetham, A. K.; Masquelier, C.; Canepa, P. Phase Stability and Sodium-Vacancy Orderings in a NaSICON Electrode. Submitted Tue, 14 Sep 2021, arXiv.org [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] arXiv:2109.06997 (accessed Sep 16, 2021).
29. Ouyang, B.; Wang, J.; He, T.; Bartel, C. J.; Huo, H.; Wang, Y.; Lacivita, V.; Kim, H.; Ceder, G. Synthetic accessibility and stability rules of NASICONs. Submitted Sat, 6 Feb 2021, arXiv.org [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] arXiv:2102.03627 (accessed Sep 15, 2021).10.1038/s41467-021-26006-3 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0404410.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04044 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13676110.1016/j.electacta.2020.136761 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22823110.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228231 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.9b1018410.1021/acsami.9b10184 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.02110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.07.021 ↗
35. 10.1039/c3cc49856e10.1039/c3cc49856e ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.9b0898710.1021/acsami.9b08987 ↗
37. 10.1149/2.0011508eel10.1149/2.0011508eel ↗
38. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
39. 10.1186/s13321-016-0129-310.1186/s13321-016-0129-3 ↗
40. 10.1021/jp061101810.1021/jp0611018 ↗
41. 10.1080/089270203100010488710.1080/0892702031000104887 ↗
42. 10.1103/physrevb.54.1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
43. Dovesi, R.; Saunders, V.; Roetti, C.; Orlando, R.; Zicovich-Wilson, C.; Pascale, F.; Civalleri, B.; Doll, K.; Harrison, N.; Bush, I. CRYSTAL17 User’s Manual; University of Torino: Torino, 2017.
44. 10.1002/wcms.136010.1002/wcms.1360 ↗
45. 10.1016/0378-4371(84)90096-710.1016/0378-4371(84)90096-7 ↗
46. CASM, v0.3-dev. 2018; available from https://github.com/prisms-center/CASMcode.
47. 10.1016/j.matcom.2009.08.00810.1016/j.matcom.2009.08.008 ↗
48. 10.1103/physrevb.88.21411110.1103/physrevb.88.214111 ↗
49. 10.1103/physrevb.88.09410810.1103/physrevb.88.094108 ↗
50. 10.1107/s002188981300353110.1107/s0021889813003531 ↗
51. 10.1039/d0cp00772b10.1039/d0cp00772b ↗
52. 10.1039/c8cc07668e10.1039/c8cc07668e ↗
53. 10.1039/d1ta01148k10.1039/d1ta01148k ↗
54. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0042610.1021/acsenergylett.1c00426 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0209210.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02092 ↗
56. 10.1021/ja204321y10.1021/ja204321y ↗
57. 10.1016/s0167-2738(03)00005-510.1016/s0167-2738(03)00005-5 ↗
58. 10.1134/s106378341801014610.1134/s1063783418010146 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0145710.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01457 ↗
60. 10.1016/0022-4596(88)90115-610.1016/0022-4596(88)90115-6 ↗
61. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0196210.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01962 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2008.02.00810.1016/j.jpcs.2008.02.008 ↗
63. 10.1002/anie.19870846110.1002/anie.198708461 ↗