journal article·2021-11-23

Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Estimate Enzyme Loading, Immobilization Yield, Activity Retention, and Reusability of Enzyme–Metal–Organic Framework Biocatalysts

Milton Chai, Sina Moradi, Eila Erfani, Mohsen Asadnia, Vicki Chen, Amir Razmjou

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 33· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

The ability to predict enzyme–metal–organic framework (MOF) properties such as enzyme loading, immobilization yield, activity retention, and reusability can maximize product yield and extend the operational life of enzyme–MOF biocatalysts. However, this is challenging due to the vast combinations of available metal and ligand building blocks for MOF and enzymes. Therefore, several machine learning (ML) algorithms are applied in this study using data collected from 127 journal articles to estimate these biocatalyst parameters. Twelve input variables, including the metal and ligand properties of MOF, as well as the enzyme properties, were integrated and fed into two ML algorithms─random forest and Gaussian process regression (GPR)─to predict model outputs. A 10-fold cross-validation approach with grid search was applied to obtain the optimal hyperparameter values. The random forest model (RFM) provided more accurate estimates of the enzyme loading, immobilization yield, and reusability of the biocatalyst than the GPR model, with relatively high R2 values of 0.85, 0.77, and 0.91, respectively. Both models are less effective in predicting the enzyme activity retention, however, with R2 values of 0.63 or lower. Sensitivity analysis of the input variables revealed the most significant variables for each corresponding output parameter, allowing further optimization of the RFM. The final RFM was then tested with a second unseen dataset collected from experiments. Findings confirmed the validity of the predictive model, including a relative error of less than 25%. Our model can aid in the synthesis of enzyme–MOF biocatalysts by providing valuable estimates of these output parameters for different MOF precursors and enzymes, saving experimental time and cost.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical Engineering, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia

UNESCO Centre for Membrane Science and Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia

School of Information, Systems, and Modelling, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2007, Australia

School of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia

Centre for Technology in Water and Wastewater, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales 2007, Australia

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.24010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.240 ↗
2. 10.1039/c3cs60021a10.1039/c3cs60021a ↗
3. 10.1007/s11814-013-0140-610.1007/s11814-013-0140-6 ↗
4. 10.1039/C4CS00003J10.1039/C4CS00003J ↗
5. 10.1039/C7CS00058H10.1039/C7CS00058H ↗
6. 10.1039/c3cs35506c10.1039/c3cs35506c ↗
7. 10.1155/2011/95072510.1155/2011/950725 ↗
8. Anderson, C. W.; Hittle, D. C.; Katz, A. D.; Kretchman, R. InReinforcement Learning, Neural Networks and PI Control Applied to a Heating Coil, Proceedings of the International Conference EANN; Citeseer, 1996; pp 135–142.
9. 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.03.02310.1016/j.eswa.2015.03.023 ↗
10. 10.2174/13862070477312080110.2174/138620704773120801 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12407210.1016/j.cej.2020.124072 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.06.04610.1016/j.bmcl.2018.06.046 ↗
13. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.01110.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 ↗
15. 10.1002/widm.107210.1002/widm.1072 ↗
16. 10.1002/widm.130110.1002/widm.1301 ↗
17. 10.1142/S012906570400189910.1142/S0129065704001899 ↗
18. 10.2166/h2oj.2020.03510.2166/h2oj.2020.035 ↗
19. 10.1080/09715010.2009.1051497510.1080/09715010.2009.10514975 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0167-8655(00)00078-710.1016/S0167-8655(00)00078-7 ↗
21. 10.1109/78.29827710.1109/78.298277 ↗
22. 10.1117/1.159065110.1117/1.1590651 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.10.02910.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.10.029 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8NJ01067F10.1039/C8NJ01067F ↗
25. 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11380110.1016/j.molliq.2020.113801 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0761810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07618 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp400642210.1021/jp4006422 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41524-017-0045-810.1038/s41524-017-0045-8 ↗
29. 10.1371/journal.pone.006768710.1371/journal.pone.0067687 ↗
30. Ho, T. K. InRandom decision forests; Proceedings of 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition; IEEE, 1995; pp 278–282.
31. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x ↗
32. Liaw A. · R news · 2002 · 2 · 18
33. Quinonero-Candela J. · 2007 · 20310.7551/mitpress/7496.003.0011 ↗
34. Souza, C. R. Kernel functions for machine learning applications. 2010 http://crsouza.com/2010/03/kernel-functions-for-machine-learning-applications/ (accessed 2021-11-01).
35. 10.14569/IJACSA.2016.07016010.14569/IJACSA.2016.070160 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.17410.1016/j.procs.2015.03.174 ↗
37. 10.3923/itj.2013.2673.268210.3923/itj.2013.2673.2682 ↗
38. 10.1515/comp-2019-001110.1515/comp-2019-0011 ↗
39. Bergstra J. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2012 · 13 · 281
40. Liu R. · 2006 · 344 · 71210.1007/978-3-540-37256-1_87 ↗
41. Bergstra, J.; Bardenet, R.; Bengio, Y.; Kégl, B. InAlgorithms for Hyper-Parameter Optimization, 25th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2011); Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, 2011.
42. 10.1038/ncomms824010.1038/ncomms8240 ↗
43. Riordan J. F. · Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. · 1977 · 7 · 119
44. 10.1039/C9RA04603H10.1039/C9RA04603H ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.17310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.173 ↗
46. 10.1002/anie.20200782710.1002/anie.202007827 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsami.8b1683710.1021/acsami.8b16837 ↗
48. 10.1093/glycob/5.2.20110.1093/glycob/5.2.201 ↗
49. 10.1021/ac201108710.1021/ac2011087 ↗
50. 10.3390/s1913293910.3390/s19132939 ↗
51. 10.1021/ic501062r10.1021/ic501062r ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.12.00110.1016/j.jmrt.2018.12.001 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsami.7b1446510.1021/acsami.7b14465 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11898610.1016/j.memsci.2020.118986 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.01910.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.019 ↗
56. 10.1039/C6RA19976C10.1039/C6RA19976C ↗
57. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.03.02510.1016/j.chempr.2019.03.025 ↗
58. 10.1039/C9SC02021G10.1039/C9SC02021G ↗