journal article·2021-11-23

Strengthening and Weakening by Dislocations in Monolayer MoS2

Li Yang, Jinjie Liu, Yanwen Lin, Ke Xu, Xuezheng Cao, Zhisen Zhang, Jianyang Wu

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 33· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Dislocations govern the properties of crystals. Yet, how pentagon–heptagon (5|7) pairs in grain boundaries (GBs) affect the mechanical properties of MoS2 remains poorly known. Using atomistic simulations and the continuum disclination dipole model, we show that depending on the tilt angle and 5|7 dislocation arrangement, MoS2 GB strength can be enhanced or reduced with the tilt angle. For zigzag-tilt GBs primarily composed of Mo5|7 + S5|7 dislocations, GB strength monotonically increases as the square of the tilt angle. For armchair-tilt GBs with Mo5|7 or S5|7 dislocations, however, the trend of GB strength breaks down, as dislocations are unevenly spaced. Moreover, mechanical failure initiates at the bond shared by 5|7 rings, in contrast to graphene in which failure occurs at the bond shared by 6|7 rings. This work provides new insights into the mechanical design of synthetic transition metal dichalcogenide crystals via dislocation engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Research Institute for Biomimetics and Soft Matter, Jiujiang Research Institute and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Soft Functional Materials Research, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, P. R. China

NTNU Nanomechanical Lab, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim 7491, Norway

Funding

Central University Basic Research Fund of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Government of Jiangxi Province

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C8NR02134A10.1039/C8NR02134A ↗
2. 10.1063/1.488618310.1063/1.4886183 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl303321g10.1021/nl303321g ↗
4. 10.1021/jp509345910.1021/jp5093459 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10704-020-00427-510.1007/s10704-020-00427-5 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
7. 10.1021/nn203879f10.1021/nn203879f ↗
8. 10.1016/0301-679X(82)90089-510.1016/0301-679X(82)90089-5 ↗
9. 10.1021/nl403661s10.1021/nl403661s ↗
10. 10.1021/nl201817810.1021/nl2018178 ↗
11. 10.1038/nnano.2010.27910.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2013.10010.1038/nnano.2013.100 ↗
13. 10.1021/nn202455710.1021/nn2024557 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn203715c10.1021/nn203715c ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.8b1985910.1021/acsami.8b19859 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.10912310.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109123 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.10910310.1016/j.jpcs.2019.109103 ↗
18. 10.1038/nmat367310.1038/nmat3673 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl400747910.1021/nl4007479 ↗
20. 10.1038/nmat363310.1038/nmat3633 ↗
21. 10.1021/nl304004210.1021/nl3040042 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0167310.1021/acsnano.6b01673 ↗
23. 10.1021/jp403976d10.1021/jp403976d ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0115610.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01156 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.12.01910.1016/j.apmt.2018.12.019 ↗
26. 10.1039/C7NR02941A10.1039/C7NR02941A ↗
27. 10.3390/cryst609011510.3390/cryst6090115 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.9b0619610.1021/acsami.9b06196 ↗
29. 10.1021/nn405288710.1021/nn4052887 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0530510.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05305 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.7b0881110.1021/acsami.7b08811 ↗
32. 10.1038/nmat337010.1038/nmat3370 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.01.00810.1016/j.jmps.2013.01.008 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.19542010.1103/PhysRevB.81.195420 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.12.02110.1016/j.carbon.2012.12.021 ↗
36. 10.1126/science.119689310.1126/science.1196893 ↗
37. 10.1038/nature0971810.1038/nature09718 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.03.01210.1016/j.carbon.2012.03.012 ↗
39. 10.1002/adfm.20140302410.1002/adfm.201403024 ↗
40. 10.3390/nano802007410.3390/nano8020074 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.10966910.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109669 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.23540810.1103/PhysRevB.92.235408 ↗
43. Li, M.; Wan, Y.; Wang, W. Prediction of Mechanical Properties for Defective Monolayer Mos2 with Single Molybdenum Vacancy Defects Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations, IEEE 17th International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), 2017; pp 9–12.10.1109/NANO.2017.8117324 ↗
44. 10.1186/s11671-016-1377-x10.1186/s11671-016-1377-x ↗
45. 10.1016/j.physleta.2014.08.00810.1016/j.physleta.2014.08.008 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0543310.1021/acs.nanolett.7b05433 ↗
47. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/18/18570510.1088/0957-4484/26/18/185705 ↗
48. 10.3390/ma1306130710.3390/ma13061307 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1009410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10094 ↗
50. 10.1039/C5CP03460D10.1039/C5CP03460D ↗
51. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa52e410.1088/1361-6528/aa52e4 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.physb.2020.41221910.1016/j.physb.2020.412219 ↗
53. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0543510.1021/acsnano.6b05435 ↗
55. 10.1039/C5CP05435D10.1039/C5CP05435D ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.25550110.1103/PhysRevLett.118.255501 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.05310.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.053 ↗
58. 10.1039/C4CP02521K10.1039/C4CP02521K ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRev.78.27510.1103/PhysRev.78.275 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.physleta.2012.02.02910.1016/j.physleta.2012.02.029 ↗
61. 10.1007/s00466-013-0952-610.1007/s00466-013-0952-6 ↗
62. 10.1007/s00466-013-0948-210.1007/s00466-013-0948-2 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.01610.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.016 ↗