journal article·2013-08-13

In Situ Observation of the Effect of Nitrogen on Carbon Nanotube Synthesis

Sebastian W. Pattinson, Rosa E. Diaz, Nadia A. Stelmashenko, Alan H. Windle, Caterina Ducati, Eric A. Stach, Krzysztof K. K. Koziol

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 25· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

The article examines the in situ observation of the effect of nitrogen on carbon nanotube synthesis. Environmental TEM (ETEM) is a relatively new technique ideal for in situ measurements. Researchers apply ETEM to study the effect of nitrogen on CNT growth, elucidating the mechanisms by which nitrogen acts, to guide efforts to optimize synthesis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in situ TEM study of the effect of nitrogen on CNT growth. Therefore, in the absence of ammonia, carbon should precipitate first, resulting in an interface with pure iron. Pure iron has a higher surface tension with the nanotube, which explains the separation of the CNT and catalyst immediately following carbon precipitation. A carbide particle will have a lower surface tension with the nanotube due to its higher carbon chemical potential and thus maintain its contact. The pure iron catalyst may become carbide following cap separation, but this will not affect CNT nucleation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, United Kingdom

Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973-5000, United States

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Li Y.-L. · Science · 2004 · 304 · 27610.1126/science.1094982 ↗
2. Hinds B. J. · Science · 2004 · 303 · 6210.1126/science.1092048 ↗
3. Tang C. · Chem. Commun. · 2003 · 305010.1039/b311807j ↗
4. Kim J. H. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2011 · 115 · 1429510.1021/jp205387y ↗
5. Gong K. · Science · 2009 · 323 · 76010.1126/science.1168049 ↗
6. Koziol K. K. K. · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 490410.1021/cm100916m ↗
7. Pattinson S. W. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 772310.1021/nn301517g ↗
8. Jourdain V. · Adv. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 44710.1002/adma.200305763 ↗
9. Redlich P. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 260 · 46510.1016/0009-2614(96)00817-2 ↗
10. Koós A. A. · Carbon · 2009 · 47 · 3010.1016/j.carbon.2008.08.014 ↗
11. Wirth C. T. · Chem. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 463310.1021/cm301402g ↗
12. Pattinson S. W. · RSC Adv. · 2012 · 2 · 290910.1039/c2ra00660j ↗
13. Gressmann T. · Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 55 · 72310.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.022 ↗
14. Szakalos P. · Mater. Corros. · 2003 · 54 · 75210.1002/maco.200303737 ↗
15. Zhang X. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 333 · 50910.1016/S0009-2614(00)01431-7 ↗
16. Wirth C. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 356010.1021/nn900613e ↗
17. Thibaux P. · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2007 · 38 · 116910.1007/s11661-007-9150-5 ↗
18. Schneider A. · Calphad · 2007 · 31 · 14110.1016/j.calphad.2006.07.008 ↗
19. Sumpter B. G. · ACS Nano · 2007 · 1 · 36910.1021/nn700143q ↗
20. Nikolussi M. · Philos. Mag. · 2010 · 90 · 110510.1080/14786430903292365 ↗
21. Pattinson S. W. · Mater. Lett. · 2013 · 93 · 40410.1016/j.matlet.2012.10.119 ↗