Impact of the MoS2 Starting Material on the Dispersion Quality and Quantity after Liquid Phase Exfoliation
Source abstract
Abstract
Liquid phase exfoliation has evolved to an important and widely used production technique for 2D materials, giving access to large quantities of nanosheets in the liquid phase. Post-exfoliation size selection, for example by liquid cascade centrifugation, can be applied to tune nanosheet lateral sizes and thicknesses. Various starting materials from powders to high-quality crystals can be used for the process. However, the impact of the starting material on the dispersion quality and quantity is widely unexplored. Here, we performed liquid phase exfoliation combined with liquid cascade centrifugation on six different MoS2 starting materials and assessed nanosheet yield, lateral size, and layer number using established quantitative spectroscopic metrics. We show that both yield and nanosheet dimensions are widely unaffected by the choice of the starting material. In contrast, some impact is observed with respect to optical properties, such as photoluminescence of the monolayers. We find that the photoluminescence intensity is lower for small crystallite bulk materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Physical Chemistry, Heidelberg University, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Centre for Advanced Materials, Heidelberg University, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Volkswagen Foundation
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1145810.1038/nature11458 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-02103410.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-021034 ↗
3. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.9810.1038/natrevmats.2016.98 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mattod.2016.10.00210.1016/j.mattod.2016.10.002 ↗
5. 10.1038/nnano.2012.19310.1038/nnano.2012.193 ↗
6. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.3310.1038/natrevmats.2017.33 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl903868w10.1021/nl903868w ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
9. 10.1038/nnano.2008.21510.1038/nnano.2008.215 ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20090206610.1002/smll.200902066 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.119497510.1126/science.1194975 ↗
12. 10.1021/cm301515z10.1021/cm301515z ↗
13. 10.1039/C8CS00084K10.1039/C8CS00084K ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0064310.1021/acs.accounts.6b00643 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0722810.1021/acsnano.5b07228 ↗
16. 10.1186/s11671-018-2648-510.1186/s11671-018-2648-5 ↗
17. 10.1088/2053-1583/ab0dc310.1088/2053-1583/ab0dc3 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0268310.1021/acsnano.5b02683 ↗
19. 10.1080/1536383X.2012.70216210.1080/1536383X.2012.702162 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.flatc.2016.12.00210.1016/j.flatc.2016.12.002 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.09610.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.096 ↗
22. 10.1039/C4RA03982C10.1039/C4RA03982C ↗
23. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0223410.1021/acsnano.9b02234 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8NR07287F10.1039/C8NR07287F ↗
25. 10.1016/0022-3093(86)90226-710.1016/0022-3093(86)90226-7 ↗
26. 10.1126/science.203.4385.110510.1126/science.203.4385.1105 ↗
27. 10.1080/0001873690010130710.1080/00018736900101307 ↗
28. 10.1038/ncomms557610.1038/ncomms5576 ↗
29. 10.1002/pssb.20170044310.1002/pssb.201700443 ↗
30. 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.02100110.1103/RevModPhys.90.021001 ↗
31. 10.1002/pssa.20170021810.1002/pssa.201700218 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0333510.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03335 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.12140410.1103/PhysRevB.96.121404 ↗
34. 10.1002/pssb.20160064510.1002/pssb.201600645 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.physb.2017.07.02610.1016/j.physb.2017.07.026 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.12400310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.124003 ↗