Managing Redox Chemistry To Deter Marine Biological Adhesion
Source abstract
Abstract
With global shipping accounting for 3.5% of annual fossil fuel use, we have incentive to keep hulls clean from encrusting foulers including barnacles, oysters, and mussels. Current antifouling coatings function by releasing biocidal copper into the surrounding waters. Rather than poisoning the oceans, environmentally benign approaches to defeating biological adhesion are in great demand. Recent chemical characterization insights have found that oxidative cross-linking of proteins plays a potentially key role in the formation of several bioadhesives. Here, antioxidant compounds were placed into coatings in order to quench oxidative chemistry and inhibit glue formation. Antioxidant-containing surfaces decreased mussel adhesion relative to controls. Attacking the mechanisms of biological adhesion may provide us with a new strategy for foul release coatings and minimize the environmental impacts of shipping.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry · Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology · Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2084, United States
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, Neil Armstrong Hall of Engineering, 701 West Stadium Avenue, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2045, United States
Funding
U.S. Department of Defense
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Conti J. J. · 2012
2. Cames M. · 2015
3. 10.1080/0892701070146197410.1080/08927010701461974 ↗
4. 10.1080/08927014.2010.54280910.1080/08927014.2010.542809 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0300-9440(99)00005-310.1016/S0300-9440(99)00005-3 ↗
6. Callow M. E. · Biologist · 2002 · 49 · 1
7. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.01.01710.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.01.017 ↗
8. 10.1021/ma052477710.1021/ma0524777 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.04110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.041 ↗
10. 10.1002/jbm.a.3162610.1002/jbm.a.31626 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.120197310910.1073/pnas.1201973109 ↗
12. 10.1080/0892701010937847410.1080/08927010109378474 ↗
13. 10.1021/la048015o10.1021/la048015o ↗
14. 10.1098/rsta.2011.050210.1098/rsta.2011.0502 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00267-005-0030-810.1007/s00267-005-0030-8 ↗
16. 10.1080/08927014.2013.84114510.1080/08927014.2013.841145 ↗
17. 10.1002/polb.2225610.1002/polb.22256 ↗
18. 10.1080/0021846090299635810.1080/00218460902996358 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.11.00910.1016/j.cbpa.2009.11.009 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.00710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.007 ↗
21. Sagert, J.; Sun, C.; Waite, J. H.InBiological Adhesives;Smith, A. M.; Callow, J. A., Eds.Springer-Verlag:Berlin, 2006; pp125–143.10.1007/978-3-540-31049-5_7 ↗
22. 10.1242/jeb.02988410.1242/jeb.029884 ↗
23. 10.1074/jbc.M91036319910.1074/jbc.M910363199 ↗
24. 10.1074/jbc.M50845720010.1074/jbc.M508457200 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.09.00810.1016/j.jsb.2009.09.008 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja104996y10.1021/ja104996y ↗
27. 10.1080/0021846050018895210.1080/00218460500188952 ↗
28. 10.1021/bm400251k10.1021/bm400251k ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20035275910.1002/anie.200352759 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.09.03610.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.09.036 ↗
31. 10.1021/jo00891a00610.1021/jo00891a006 ↗
32. 10.1021/es00110a00910.1021/es00110a009 ↗
33. Verschueren K. · 1983
34. 10.1016/0045-6535(81)90048-510.1016/0045-6535(81)90048-5 ↗
35. Keith L. H. · 1992
36. 10.1080/0021846090299690310.1080/00218460902996903 ↗
37. 10.1093/mollus/53.3.29310.1093/mollus/53.3.293 ↗
38. 10.1093/icesjms/23.2.24910.1093/icesjms/23.2.249 ↗
39. 10.1021/cr200350v10.1021/cr200350v ↗