Effects of Mesoporous Silica Coating and Postsynthetic Treatment on the Transverse Relaxivity of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles have the capacity to load and deliver therapeutic cargo and incorporate imaging modalities, making them prominent candidates for theranostic devices. One of the most widespread imaging agents utilized in this and other theranostic platforms is nanoscale superparamagnetic iron oxide. Although several core–shell magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles presented in the literature have provided high T 2 contrast in vitro and in vivo, there is ambiguity surrounding which parameters lead to enhanced contrast. Additionally, there is a need to understand the behavior of these imaging agents over time in biologically relevant environments. Herein, we present a systematic analysis of how the transverse relaxivity ( r 2 ) of magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles is influenced by nanoparticle diameter, iron oxide nanoparticle core synthesis, and use of a hydrothermal treatment. This work demonstrates that samples which did not undergo a hydrothermal treatment experienced a drop in r 2 (75% of original r 2 within 8 days of water storage), while samples with hydrothermal treatment maintained roughly the same r 2 for over 30 days in water. Our results suggest that iron oxide oxidation is the cause of r 2 loss, and this oxidation can be prevented during both synthesis and storage by use of deoxygenated conditions during nanoparticle synthesis. Hydrothermal treatment also provides colloidal stability, even in acidic and highly salted solutions, and a resistance against acid degradation of the iron oxide nanoparticle core. Results of this study show the promise of multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles but will also likely inspire further investigation into multiple types of theranostic devices, taking into consideration their behavior over time and in relevant biological environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant Street Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 Sixth Street Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
Department of Physics, University of Minnesota, 116 Church Street Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Wolf L. K. · Chem. Eng. News · 2011 · 89 · 2910.1021/cen-v089n039.p029 ↗
2. Lee J. E. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2011 · 44 · 89310.1021/ar2000259 ↗
3. Lin Y.-S. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 3 · 36410.1021/jz2013837 ↗
4. Lee C.-H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 21510.1002/adfm.200800753 ↗
5. Luo T. · Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 1703010.1364/OE.19.017030 ↗
6. Huang X. · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 437010.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.060 ↗
7. Lin Y.-S. · Chem. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 517010.1021/cm061976z ↗
8. Kim J. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 843810.1002/anie.200802469 ↗
9. Tsai C.-P. · Small · 2008 · 4 · 18610.1002/smll.200700457 ↗
10. Stephen Z. R. · Mater. Today · 2011 · 14 · 33010.1016/S1369-7021(11)70163-8 ↗
11. Yoo D. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2011 · 44 · 86310.1021/ar200085c ↗
12. Neoh K. G. · Soft Matter · 2012 · 8 · 205710.1039/C1SM06846F ↗
13. Pinho S. L. C. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 533910.1021/nn101129r ↗
14. Pinho S. L. C. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 228510.1021/jp2086413 ↗
15. Hu F. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 2085510.1021/jp907216g ↗
16. Tong S. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 460710.1021/nl102623x ↗
17. Perez J. M. · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2002 · 20 · 81610.1038/nbt720 ↗
18. Larsen B. A. · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 26510210.1088/0957-4484/19/26/265102 ↗
19. Carroll M. R. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 32570210.1088/0957-4484/22/32/325702 ↗
20. Tanaka K. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1175910.1021/la1015077 ↗
21. Wu S.-H. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 99 · 81
22. Roca A. G. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 703310.1021/jp807820s ↗
23. Giri S. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2005 · 44 · 503810.1002/anie.200501819 ↗
24. Lee J. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 55210.1021/ja905793q ↗
25. Lee K. R. · Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 673810.1021/cm802335r ↗
26. Lin Y.-S. · Chem. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 397910.1021/cm901259n ↗
27. Liong M. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 88910.1021/nn800072t ↗
28. Yoon T.-J. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 466310.1002/anie.201100101 ↗
29. Lee Y.-C. · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 356010.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.062 ↗
30. Schultz-Sikma E. A. · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 265710.1021/cm200509g ↗
31. Lin Y.-S. · Chem. Commun. · 2011 · 47 · 53210.1039/C0CC02923H ↗
32. Lin Y.-S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 2044410.1021/ja208567v ↗
33. Molday, R. S.U.S. Patent 4,452,773, 1984.
34. Sun S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 27310.1021/ja0380852 ↗
35. Ma M. · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2011 · 13 · 324910.1007/s11051-011-0239-9 ↗
36. Gillis P. · Magn. Reson. Med. · 1987 · 5 · 32310.1002/mrm.1910050404 ↗
37. Rebodos R. L. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1674510.1021/la102461z ↗
38. Kang Y. S. · Chem. Mater. · 1996 · 8 · 220910.1021/cm960157j ↗
39. Colliex C. · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 44 · 1140210.1103/PhysRevB.44.11402 ↗
40. van Aken P. A. · Phys. Chem. Miner. · 1998 · 25 · 32310.1007/s002690050122 ↗
41. Slowing I. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 1479210.1021/ja0645943 ↗
42. Chung T.-H. · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 295910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.006 ↗
43. Davila-Ibanez A. B. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 74710.1021/nn204231g ↗
44. Brillet P.-Y. · Eur. Radiol. · 2005 · 15 · 136910.1007/s00330-004-2586-8 ↗
45. Arbab A. S. · NMR Biomed. · 2005 · 18 · 38310.1002/nbm.970 ↗
46. Frenier W. W. · Corrosion · 1984 · 40 · 66310.5006/1.3593905 ↗
47. Sidhu P. S. · Clay Clay Miner. · 1981 · 29 · 26910.1346/CCMN.1981.0290404 ↗