Strong, Ductile MOF–Poly(urethane urea) Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal–organic framework (MOF)–polymer hybrid materials have been investigated for use in personal protective equipment (PPE) for combating chemical threats. However, few of these composite materials have demonstrated the desired processability or balance of strength and ductility suitable for modern textiles. In this work, a poly(urethane urea) (PUU) polymer was synthesized to mimic solution-processable spandex for MOF composites that have combined advantages for both the force the composite can withstand (strength) and the ability of the material to deform under strain (ductility). UiO-66/PUU mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) with up to 50 wt % UiO-66 MOF showed both high strength and ductility. UiO-66 and UiO-66-NH2 MMMs with PUU mechanically outperformed previously studied 50 wt % MOF/poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVDF) MMMs. Testing of MMMs against the chemical warfare agent simulant dimethyl-4-nitrophenylphosphate (DMNP) revealed that the polymer plays an important role, with UiO-66-NH2/PUU MMM showing the fastest hydrolysis rate. Ductile fibers of 50 wt % UiO-66 and UiO-66-NH2 PUU composites were successfully prepared and showed remarkable handling properties and activity toward DMNP hydrolysis with 50 wt % UiO-66-NH2/PUU fibers performing better than any of the MMMs tested. These MOF–polymer composites could also be electrospun into nanofiber mats, which further illustrates the diverse range of processing techniques available for these materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Flame retardant materials and properties · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
Department of Nanoengineering, University of California, San Diego, Jacobs School of Engineering, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
DEVCOM Chemical and Biological Center, U.S. Army, 8198 Blackhawk Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21020, United States
Funding
U.S. Department of Defense · Defense Threat Reduction Agency · Office of International Science and Engineering
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0057510.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00575 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.9b2015410.1021/acsami.9b20154 ↗
3. 10.1039/C7CS00108H10.1039/C7CS00108H ↗
4. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20170430310.1002/adma.201704303 ↗
6. 10.1021/cr400647310.1021/cr4006473 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0082810.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00828 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp302887910.1021/jp3028879 ↗
9. 10.1021/ja003518b10.1021/ja003518b ↗
10. 10.1021/la990716b10.1021/la990716b ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0316010.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03160 ↗
12. 10.1039/C4NJ02093F10.1039/C4NJ02093F ↗
13. 10.1002/ange.20130752010.1002/ange.201307520 ↗
14. 10.1021/jacs.6b1137310.1021/jacs.6b11373 ↗
15. 10.1039/C8CC03255F10.1039/C8CC03255F ↗
16. 10.1021/ie403366d10.1021/ie403366d ↗
17. 10.1039/C5CC03780H10.1039/C5CC03780H ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.00810.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.008 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20181265510.1002/anie.201812655 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20160665610.1002/anie.201606656 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.7b1936510.1021/acsami.7b19365 ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.9b0730110.1021/jacs.9b07301 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.8b0288610.1021/acsami.8b02886 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.9b2091010.1021/acsami.9b20910 ↗
25. 10.1039/C8SC02356E10.1039/C8SC02356E ↗
26. 10.1039/C5SC04368A10.1039/C5SC04368A ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.10008510.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100085 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.7b0920910.1021/acsami.7b09209 ↗
29. 10.1002/pi.585610.1002/pi.5856 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.01210.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.012 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0290810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02908 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0275610.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02756 ↗
33. 10.5923/j.cmaterials.20120202.0310.5923/j.cmaterials.20120202.03 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20150407710.1002/anie.201504077 ↗
35. 10.1021/jacs.9b0278910.1021/jacs.9b02789 ↗
36. 10.1002/1099-0488(20000701)38:13<1716::AID-POLB50>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/1099-0488(20000701)38:13<1716::AID-POLB50>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
37. Korinko, P.; Chapman, G. Characterization Of Tensile Strength Of Glovebox Gloves; 2012; p 28.10.2172/1036011 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0196-6553(99)70006-410.1016/S0196-6553(99)70006-4 ↗
39. 10.1016/0032-3861(85)90015-110.1016/0032-3861(85)90015-1 ↗
40. 10.1039/C9CC02252J10.1039/C9CC02252J ↗
41. 10.1039/C6CC07329H10.1039/C6CC07329H ↗
42. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0023010.1021/acsapm.0c00230 ↗
43. 10.1002/pi.615110.1002/pi.6151 ↗
44. 10.1002/asia.20190084310.1002/asia.201900843 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.0c1793710.1021/acsami.0c17937 ↗
46. 10.1039/C7SC04152G10.1039/C7SC04152G ↗
47. 10.1021/jacs.9b0278910.1021/jacs.9b02789 ↗
48. 10.1038/nmat411310.1038/nmat4113 ↗
49. 10.1002/anie.20200420510.1002/anie.202004205 ↗
50. 10.1021/jacs.6b0255310.1021/jacs.6b02553 ↗