journal article·2020-12-22

Comparison of Redox Responsiveness and Antitumor Capability of Paclitaxel Dimeric Nanoparticles with Different Linkers

Jian Wang, Qing Pei, Rui Xia, Shi Liu, Xiuli Hu, Zhigang Xie, Xiabin Jing

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 32· Issue 24
Publisher page

Abstract

Because of the high expression of glutathione (GSH) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cancer cells, nanoparticles formed by various redox-responsive linkers have been widely developed. However, the differences in the sensitivity of different linkers to a redox-heterogeneous intracellular environment have not been systematically studied. Herein, four kinds of paclitaxel dimeric nano-prodrug with different linkers, including mono-thioether, disulfide with one methylene, and disulfide with two methylene and ester, were designed and synthesized to explore the differences in redox responsiveness and antitumor capability. We find that the mono-thioether bond with one methylene on both sides is the most sensitive to reduction, while the disulfide bond with one methylene is the most sensitive to oxidation. The sensitivity to redox response is not only related to the redox bond but also to the length of the carbon chain, which has an important impact on drug release, cytotoxicity, and antitumor capability. Our research provides a reference for the rational design of subsequent redox-responsive prodrugs or carriers, which is significant for cancer treatment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 5625 Renmin Street, Changchun 130022, Jilin, P. R. China

University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41572-019-0064-510.1038/s41572-019-0064-5 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20160211110.1002/adma.201602111 ↗
3. 10.1021/nn502146r10.1021/nn502146r ↗
4. 10.1021/ja107333g10.1021/ja107333g ↗
5. 10.1002/smll.20180241710.1002/smll.201802417 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0416610.1021/acsnano.9b04166 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0045210.1021/acsnano.9b00452 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0556310.1021/acsnano.5b05563 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.9b0922010.1021/jacs.9b09220 ↗
10. 10.1039/C6CS00616G10.1039/C6CS00616G ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0022810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00228 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20190415610.1002/adma.201904156 ↗
13. 10.1038/nnano.2017.11310.1038/nnano.2017.113 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0234010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02340 ↗
15. 10.1039/C6CS00898D10.1039/C6CS00898D ↗
16. 10.1038/nrc359910.1038/nrc3599 ↗
17. 10.1038/nm.185810.1038/nm.1858 ↗
18. 10.1021/cr100147u10.1021/cr100147u ↗
19. 10.1038/ncomms480210.1038/ncomms4802 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.09.00610.1016/j.jconrel.2012.09.006 ↗
21. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-065510.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0655 ↗
22. Ibrahim N. K. · Clin. Cancer Res. · 2002 · 8 · 1038
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.04810.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.048 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.08.03410.1016/j.jconrel.2017.08.034 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tips.2014.09.00810.1016/j.tips.2014.09.008 ↗
26. 10.1039/c3bm60112a10.1039/c3bm60112a ↗
27. 10.2174/156720181166614060915494910.2174/1567201811666140609154949 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.39110.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.391 ↗
29. 10.1021/jacs.9b0717110.1021/jacs.9b07171 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20130092910.1002/adma.201300929 ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20170262010.1002/anie.201702620 ↗
32. 10.1021/nl502044x10.1021/nl502044x ↗
33. 10.1039/C5CC04164C10.1039/C5CC04164C ↗
34. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.01010.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.010 ↗
35. 10.1002/anie.20120963310.1002/anie.201209633 ↗
36. 10.1021/jacs.8b0772710.1021/jacs.8b07727 ↗
37. 10.1002/anie.20191443410.1002/anie.201914434 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.002 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.13610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.136 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.04910.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.049 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0640010.1021/acsnano.8b06400 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41467-019-11193-x10.1038/s41467-019-11193-x ↗
43. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0821910.1021/acsnano.7b08219 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0391010.1021/acsnano.9b03910 ↗
45. 10.1002/adfm.20160420610.1002/adfm.201604206 ↗
46. 10.1021/ja065660410.1021/ja0656604 ↗
47. 10.1021/bi00037a02910.1021/bi00037a029 ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20180574010.1002/adma.201805740 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0800810.1021/acsnano.7b08008 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.03010.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.030 ↗
51. 10.1039/D0NH00034E10.1039/D0NH00034E ↗