Study of Imidazole-Based Proton-Conducting Composite Materials Using Solid-State NMR
Source abstract
Abstract
The application of solid-state NMR methods to characterize the structure and dynamics of imidazole-based proton-conducting polymeric materials provides insight into the mechanism (Grotthus vs vehicle) of proton-mobility. The presented materials are built on a siloxane backbone, and are of interest as potential new proton-conducting membranes for fuel cells able to function at temperatures above 130 °C. This is expected to improve the CO tolerance of the catalyst in the fuel cell, as compared to water-based systems. High-resolution solid-state 1 H NMR is achieved under fast magic-angle spinning (MAS) conditions (30 kHz), and provides resolution of resonances in the hydrogen-bonding region. Homonuclear double quantum filtered (DQF) NMR spectra, acquired using the back-to-back sequence, provided identification of mobile protons. It was found that proton conductivity, observed macroscopically using impedance spectroscopy, is correlated with local proton mobility, observed via 1 H NMR line width trends observed for the hydrogen-bonded protons. 1 H MAS and DQF NMR experiments show no crystal packing of these materials in contrast to model oligo-ethyleneoxide-tethered imidazole materials (Imi- n EO) studied previously. Comparisons of macroscopic and microscopic measures of proton mobility are also presented in the activation energies of pure and acid-doped siloxane oligomers and polymers functionalized with imidazole. The acid-doped materials show enhanced proton mobility, and hence higher conductivity, relative to the pure material.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Mainz, Germany
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Roziere J. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2003 · 33 · 55510.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022702.154657 ↗
2. Schuster M. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2003 · 33 · 26110.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022702.155349 ↗
3. De Zea Bermudez V. · J. Mater. Chem. · 1997 · 7 · 169210.1039/a701836c ↗
4. Mauritz K. A. · Chem. Rev. · 2004 · 104 · 458610.1021/cr0207123 ↗
5. Herz H. G. · Electrochem. Acta · 2003 · 48 · 2171
6. Kreuer K. D. · Electrochem. Acta · 1998 · 43 · 128810.1016/S0013-4686(97)10031-7 ↗
7. Schuster M. · Solid State Ionics · 2001 · 145 · 9210.1016/S0167-2738(01)00917-1 ↗
8. Goward G. R. · J. Phys. Chem. B. · 2002 · 106 · 933410.1021/jp0259521 ↗
9. Scharfenberger, G. et al. Ph.D. Thesis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany, 2003.http://ArchiMeD.uni-mainz.de/pub/2003/0113.
10. Goward G. R. · J. Phys. Chem. B. · 2004 · 108 · 18508
11. Brown S. P. · Chem. Rev. · 2001 · 101 · 415510.1021/cr990132e ↗
12. Bain A. D. · Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. · 2003 · 43 · 103
13. (a) Becker, E. D.High-Resolution NMR Theory and ChemicalApplications, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 2000; pp 30−32.
14. (b) Harris, R. K.Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A PhysiochemicalView;Pitman Books Ltd. London, 1983; p 122.
15. Schnell I. · J. Magn. Reson. · 2001 · 151 · 22710.1006/jmre.2001.2336 ↗
16. Grimmer A.-R. · Magn. Reson. Chem. · 1997 · 35 · 8610.1002/(SICI)1097-458X(199702)35:2<86::AID-OMR34>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
17. van Moorsel G.-J. · J. Magn. Reson. · 1995 · 113 · 15910.1006/jmra.1995.1075 ↗
18. Langer B. · J. Magn. Reson. · 1999 · 138 · 18210.1006/jmre.1999.1717 ↗
19. Munch W. · Solid State Ionics · 2001 · 145 · 44310.1016/S0167-2738(01)00941-9 ↗
20. Colomban Ph. · 199210.1017/CBO9780511524806 ↗
21. Goward G. R. · Solid State NMR · 2003 · 24 · 16210.1016/S0926-2040(03)00043-2 ↗
22. Costamagna P. · Electrochim. Acta · 2002 · 47 · 102310.1016/S0013-4686(01)00829-5 ↗