journal article·2017-11-14

Effects of Anion Mobility on Electrochemical Behaviors of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Kee Sung Han, Junzheng Chen, Ruiguo Cao, Nav Nidhi Rajput, Vijayakumar Murugesan, Lili Shi, Huilin Pan, Ji-Guang Zhang, Jun Liu, Kristin A. Persson, Karl T. Mueller

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 29· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

The electrolyte is a crucial component of lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries, as it controls polysulfide dissolution, charge shuttling processes, and solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer formation. Experimentally, the overall performance of Li–S batteries varies with choice of solvent system and Li-salt used in the electrolyte, and a lack of predictive understanding about the effects of individual electrolyte components inhibits the rational design of electrolytes for Li–S batteries. Here we analyze the role of the counteranions of common Li salts (such as TfO –, FSI –, TFSI –, and TDI – ) when dissolved in DOL/DME (1:1 by vol.) for use in Li–S batteries. The evolution of ion–ion and ion–solvent interactions due to various anions was analyzed using 17 O NMR and pulsed-field gradient (PFG) NMR and then correlated with electrochemical performance in Li–S cells. These data reveal that the formation of the passivation layer on the anode and the loss of active materials from the cathode (evidenced by polysulfide dissolution) are related to anion mobility and affinity with lithium polysulfide, respectively. For future electrolyte design, anions with lower mobility and weaker interactions with lithium polysulfides may be superior candidates for increasing the long-term stability of Li–S batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States

Joint Center for Energy Storage Research (JCESR), Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States

Energy and Environmental Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, Unites States

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States

Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1760, United States

Physical and Computational Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20130476210.1002/anie.201304762 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr500062v10.1021/cr500062v ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20150011710.1002/aenm.201500117 ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20160016010.1002/aenm.201600160 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20150507410.1002/adfm.201505074 ↗
6. 10.1021/je300308910.1021/je3003089 ↗
7. 10.1021/cr040671610.1021/cr0406716 ↗
8. National Center for Biotechnology Information.http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov(accessed August 2015).
9. 10.1021/jz400661k10.1021/jz400661k ↗
10. Scheers, J.Private communication, July 2015.
11. 10.1039/B612297C10.1039/B612297C ↗
12. 10.1149/2.035209jes10.1149/2.035209jes ↗
13. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2009.09.00210.1016/j.pnmrs.2009.09.002 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp411841910.1021/jp4118419 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.22780110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.227801 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0116010.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01160 ↗
17. 10.1021/jp512857810.1021/jp5128578 ↗
18. 10.1039/C4CC06666A10.1039/C4CC06666A ↗
19. 10.1039/C3TA14914E10.1039/C3TA14914E ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.05210.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.052 ↗
21. 10.1021/jp412601x10.1021/jp412601x ↗
22. 10.1021/jp408037e10.1021/jp408037e ↗
23. 10.1021/jp407158y10.1021/jp407158y ↗
24. 10.1039/C4CP00889H10.1039/C4CP00889H ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20140179210.1002/aenm.201401792 ↗