Optimization of the efficacy and angle dependence of emission of top-emissive organic light-emitting diodes on metal foils
Source abstract
Abstract
We have investigated how to optimize the efficacy and angle dependence of emission of top-emissive organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) based on metal foil substrates with the aim of creating efficient flexible devices for lighting and signage applications. By systematically varying the device architecture we were able to tune the optical microcavity which exists within the device structure and observe the change in performance. We paid particular attention to the effects of the metal foil roughness. We have seen that by changing the layer thickness of the poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(styrenesulfonate) [PEDOT:PSS] in the device, and the substrate reflectivity and roughness we can obtain efficacies not too far from those achieved for standard bottom-emissive devices on glass substrates made with the same emitter. The angle dependence of luminance can be tuned from pointing in the forward direction via Lambertian to having a maximum at around 65°, and we have used optical modeling to help us find the optimum device structure. We conclude that (rough) metal foils are a realistic possibility for making flexible OLEDs and have demonstrated large area (up to 12 cm × 12 cm), thin film encapsulated, flexible devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.256.5053.6610.1126/science.256.5053.66 ↗
2. 10.1889/1.243340510.1889/1.2433405 ↗
3. 10.1889/1.243340610.1889/1.2433406 ↗
4. 10.1889/1.306968910.1889/1.3069689 ↗
5. Walzer · 2007
6. 10.1364/AO.48.00228210.1364/AO.48.002282 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.322599810.1063/1.3225998 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.308885410.1063/1.3088854 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cap.2007.11.00210.1016/j.cap.2007.11.002 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.315314010.1063/1.3153140 ↗
11. 10.1080/1542140100360846910.1080/15421401003608469 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.11.06310.1016/j.tsf.2009.11.063 ↗
13. 10.1143/JJAP.47.735910.1143/JJAP.47.7359 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.08.07810.1016/j.tsf.2007.08.078 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.282718210.1063/1.2827182 ↗
16. 10.1364/OL.35.00046210.1364/OL.35.000462 ↗
17. 10.1143/JJAP.46.405410.1143/JJAP.46.4054 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.153705210.1063/1.1537052 ↗
19. 10.1364/JOSAA.15.00096210.1364/JOSAA.15.000962 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.273922010.1063/1.2739220 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.174510710.1063/1.1745107 ↗
22. S. A. Ahkmanov and S. Yu. Nikitin ,Physical Optics, Oxford University Press, New York (1997).
23. 10.1063/1.217273410.1063/1.2172734 ↗
24. C. Tanase, P. van de Weijer, H. Lifka, and G. Rietjens , “Thin film encapsulated transparent organic light emitting diodes,”Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.Vol. 1091E, Warrendale, PA, 2008), 1091-AA13−08.
25. F. van Assche, H. Rooms, E. Young, J. Michels, T. van Mol, G. Rietjens, P. van de Weijer, and P. Bouten , “Thin-film barrier on film for organic LED lamps,” AIMCAL Fall Technical Conference, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina (2008).
26. J. C. Stover , Optical Scattering Measurement and Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York (1995).10.1117/3.203079 ↗
27. W. A. P. Smith and E. R. Hancock , “A unified model of specular and diffuse reflectance for rough, glossy surfaces,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Miami, Florida, pp. 643–650 (2009). 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206498
28. For more information, see: www.holstcentre.com