General Observation of Fe3+/Fe2+ Redox Couple Close to 4 V in Partially Substituted Li2FeP2O7 Pyrophosphate Solid-Solution Cathodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Exploring the newly unveiled Li 2 M P 2 O 7 pyrophosphate cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries, the current study reports the general observation of an unusually high Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ redox potential close to 4.0 V vs Li/Li + in mixed-metal Li 2 M x Fe 1– x P 2 O 7 ( M = Mn, Co, Mg) phases with a monoclinic structure (space group P 2 1 / c ). Such a high voltage Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ operation over 3.5 V has long been believed to be possible only by the existence of much more electronegative but hygroscopic anions such as SO 4 2– or F – . Thereby, this is the first universal confirmation of >3.5 V operation by stable, simple phosphate material. High voltage (close to 4 V) operation of the Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ couple was stabilized by all dopants, either by larger Mn 2+ or smaller Co 2+ and Mg 2+ ions, where Mg 2+ is redox inactive, revealing that the high voltage is induced neither by reduced Fe–O bond covalency nor by contamination by the redox couple of other transition metals. The cause of higher Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ redox potential is argued and rooted in the stabilized edge-sharing local structural arrangement and the associated larger Gibbs free energy in the charged state.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical System Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. d’Yvoire F. · Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. · 1962 · 1 · 1224
2. Gamondes J. P. · Acad. Sci., Paris, C. R. · 1969 · 269 · 1532
3. Belkouch J. · Mater. Res. Bull. · 1995 · 30 · 14910.1016/0025-5408(94)00128-6 ↗
4. Barpanda P. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2012 · 2 · 84110.1002/aenm.201100772 ↗
5. Padhi A. K. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1997 · 144 · 160910.1149/1.1837649 ↗
6. Adam L. · J. Solid State Chem. · 2008 · 181 · 311010.1016/j.jssc.2008.07.039 ↗
7. Nishimura S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1359610.1021/ja106297a ↗
8. Kim H. · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 393010.1021/cm201305z ↗
9. Shimizu D. · Chem. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 259810.1021/cm301337z ↗
10. Tamaru M. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 2452610.1039/c2jm35260e ↗
11. Furuta N. · Chem. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 105510.1021/cm2032465 ↗
12. Zhou H. · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 29310.1021/cm102922q ↗
13. Barpanda P. · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 77210.1038/nmat3093 ↗
14. Shannon R. D. · Acta Crystallogr. · 1976 · 32 · 75110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
15. Recham N. · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 6810.1038/nmat2590 ↗
16. Huang Y. · Solid State Ionics · 2011 · 201 · 5410.1016/j.ssi.2011.07.018 ↗
17. Nytén A. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2006 · 16 · 226610.1039/B601184E ↗
18. Lee Y. T. · J. Power Sources · 2004 · 134 · 8810.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.001 ↗
19. Nishimura, S.; Kurita, T. Yamada, A.Unpublished.
20. Chung S. C. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 867810.1039/c2cp40489c ↗
21. Malik R. · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 21420110.1103/PhysRevB.79.214201 ↗
22. Momma K. · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2011 · 13 · 127210.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗