Layer-by-Layer Growth of Incommensurate, Polycrystalline, Lying-Down Pentacene Thin Films on Au(111)
Source abstract
Abstract
Pentacene, as well as other polyacenes, is known to adsorb on metal surfaces in a lying-down geometry, that is, with the molecular plane parallel to the surface. Here we show using scanning tunneling microscopy that the lying-down pentacene monolayer seeds the growth of a multilayer polycrystalline film in a layer-by-layer fashion, with the molecular planes parallel to the substrate surface. Growth in the submonolayer region is characterized by a large number of ordered molecular structures as coverage increases. The saturated monolayer structure remains approximately the same throughout multilayer coverages studied. Statistical analysis of molecular domain orientation reveals that the ordered pentacene structures are incommensurate with the Au(111) substrate and growth beyond the monolayer region is a mixture of epitaxy and nonepitaxy. We conclude that the relatively large footprint of a lying-down pentacene molecule smoothes out lateral corrugation in the adsorption energy landscape on the Au(111) surface, leading to the growth of an incommensurate, polycrystalline, and partially nonepitaxial thin film.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Graphene research and applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Dimitrakopoulos C. D. · Adv. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 9910.1002/1521-4095(20020116)14:2<99::AID-ADMA99>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
2. Gundlach D. J. · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 1997 · 18 · 8710.1109/55.556089 ↗
3. Tang C. W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1987 · 51 · 91310.1063/1.98799 ↗
4. Burrows P. E. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1993 · 62 · 310210.1063/1.109151 ↗
5. Sirringhaus H. · Science · 1998 · 280 · 174110.1126/science.280.5370.1741 ↗
6. Fedoruk G. G. · Sens. Actuators, B · 1998 · 48 · 35110.1016/S0925-4005(98)00070-7 ↗
7. Brabec C. J. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2001 · 11 · 1510.1002/1616-3028(200102)11:1<15::AID-ADFM15>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
8. Fenter P. · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 56 · 304610.1103/PhysRevB.56.3046 ↗
9. Peisert H. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 46910.1063/1.1375017 ↗
10. Ellis T. S. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 98210.1063/1.1637137 ↗
11. Schmitz-Hubsch T. · Surf. Sci. · 1999 · 437 · 16310.1016/S0039-6028(99)00711-6 ↗
12. Schuerlein T. J. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 34 · 384510.1143/JJAP.34.3837 ↗
13. France C. B. · Langmuir · 2003 · 19 · 128110.1021/la026221v ↗
14. Kang J. H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 324810.1063/1.1572554 ↗
15. Chen Q. · Langmuir · 2003 · 19 · 10171
16. Casalis L. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 20610110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.206101 ↗
17. Guaino P. · Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 540 · 11610.1016/S0039-6028(03)00751-9 ↗
18. Lukas S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 2830110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.028301 ↗
19. Suzuki T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 434210.1063/1.1630161 ↗
20. Beernink G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 39810.1063/1.1775040 ↗
21. Kang J. H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 15211510.1063/1.1900944 ↗
22. Silinsh E. A. · 1994
23. France C. B. · Nano Lett. · 2002 · 2 · 69310.1021/nl025567n ↗
24. Chambliss D. D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1991 · 66 · 172110.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1721 ↗
25. Stroscio J. A. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 1992 · 10 · 198110.1116/1.578013 ↗
26. Schroeder P. G. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 301010.1063/1.1445286 ↗
27. Zhu X.-Y. · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 2004 · 56 · 110.1016/j.surfrep.2004.09.002 ↗